Which company will Nintendo acquire first?

>that focuses on games, fun and interesting gameplay

What about the cardboard, shit hardware, fitness games? Excessive toy obsession?

I wouldnt say there is any focus on Nintendo's end other than pushing shit hardware to regress games.

>fun and interesting gameplay
The Switch has been nothing but casual games with simplified gameplay. I guess a child can find stuff like Pokemon and Animal Crossing interesting, but I wouldnt say anyone over 15 would. What "gameplay" we talking here?

>Konami
>285 million dollars
Fuck pachinko
So many IPs will never see the light of day again

They did? I only remember Wild to have disappeared.

SEGA and Square Enix would be good buys.

Square haven't made a good game in a while, but normie fantasy sells.

SEGA have a huge library of IP, the problem is they sacrifice quality for quantity too often. Nintendo could reign it in.

They should have bought Atlus and Grasshopper while they had the opportunity. Realistically, I'm not sure how many companies they can buy and that graph doesn't really tell us anything. They could probably get Koei Tecmo or Marvelous though.

they keep making shit games no one wants

>ubisoft -65
HAHAHAHA
GET FUCKED YOU SHITTY ASS COMPANY LOOOOOOL

The graph is just shortsighted quarterly profits. I don't see why Nintendo would suddenly buy shit when they always play it safe and cheap.

super smash bros X EA
fucking finally

but how the fuck is EA doing still well
and why is konami above capcummies

I could see them buying Ubisoft or Bandi Namco but nothing else on that list.

EA would be hilarious. FIFA doesn't require a good machine, so if sports fags were forced to buy Nintendo machines that would be fucking hilarious.
Capcom would be another good choice. WEEB action games I can imagine being solely on Switch

>no new rayman
>no new mario rabbids
More xcom games are always good despite the minions tier meme rabbids

Hopefully none of them. I don't want lgbt propaganda in my nintendo games too.

>sell games with wide market appeal and to children
>why do these games that are for wide audiences and the biggest group of video game players(children) do well?
You're not very clever are you?

Nintendo needs to buy Sony and save them from their Californian fate

>sony g &ns
Gays & niggers?

Prease understand, smarr famiry business.

That's my point, Nintendo games are for the lowest common denominator and non-gamers, making it worthless for a hobbyist.

Attached: ac.png (635x223, 57.42K)

Profit isn't the same thing as value. Nintendo does make a lot of money but in terms of total value of all resources, just about every other company on that list would be more expensive to purchase than Nintendo.

Not to mention this is a single quarter.

>Konami
>$285 mil
Glad to see them recovering from the disease that is Hideo Kojima and his disastrous tenure as company VP. Hopefully Sony doesn’t learn that lesson.

Nintendo operates differently, they put all their revenue in a warchest and sit on it until the lean times.

> true hobby gamers are above playing nintendo games
lol

Capcom makes the most sense.

>sega
Fucking how?

Nintendo dont like to buy big studios.Realistically they would buy a studio like Treasure who is almost bankrupt or Vanillaware who is a small studio or maybe Valhalla Game Studios

They can easily play them but quickly realize they are shallow/mediocre ventures that indie games outdo on the regular.

There isnt a single stand out Switch exclusive outside of a casual 3D mario that isnt even regarded as nearly the best one.

I thought Capcom was having a renaissance? Hopefully this means Iceborne underperformed and will make them rethink some design choices like the crutch claw

Realistically, none of them. If Nintendo was really interested in that sort of thing they would already have bought Fatlus when they had the chance.