ITT cautiously optimistic character designs

>Casually is best companion partner in any Mario spin off
>Wasn't even made by Nintendo

Attached: MRKB_Beep-0_Icon_2.png (215x215, 49.49K)

Isn't he just Stuffwell 2.0?

Accurate but in the other Marios' defense he's one of, what, three? Characters in the whole game with meaningful dialogue, not to mention commentator of everything you look at, he's basically carrying the whole game

No

So he's made in the same vain as Goombario and Goombella? Didn't touch that Rabbid shit since it didn't have Rayman.

Atleast Origami guide has some form of being

>atleast
There's the fan favorite word of the Nintendo fanbase

This is a truer statement than it should be.

It was actually pretty soild X-com clone.
Also I think Ubisoft has since made it a point to detach Rayman from anything relating to the Rabbids nowadays.

I never thought I'd say this but the game makes the Rabbids actually funny, even endearing. It dials down the obnoxious element and just makes them a fun contrast to the Mario characters.

Your blind, can't you see her fucking hair? Her hat? her arms?

Neither of which are in the other two, just Huey opening his handle as arms, but it's still a fucking bucket

yeah.. now that you mention it

He's saying atleast because OP is clumping her with the other 2 for no reason.

Olivia is easily the best designed out of Tippi, a fucking butterfly, Kersti, a fucking crown with eyes, Huey, a fucking bucket with eyes, Stuffwell, a fucking suitcase with a face, Starlow, a ball with a face.

Olivia is objectively the best designed 1-off companion out of these roles.

Attached: mario-olivia-bobomb.png (804x759, 501.19K)

>for no reason
>the theme of the game is sticker so the partner is a sticker
>the theme of the game is paint so the partner is paint
>the theme of the game is origami so the partner is origami

What are you smoking mate? Olivia is designed like an origami person, a species. Not an object with eyes or just a plain object the rest of Paper Mario and Mario and Luigi used as Navi characters

Attached: oc.png (870x727, 766.5K)

Yes and?

Yeah that’s how the games are designed now, that doesn’t change the fact that Olivia is designed to look like an actual character and not an object with eyes.

And it's clear why this rehashed formula and its OCs are grouped together.

It's also a pretty great game in general. Now I partially in some small way, understand the rage XCom players feel as they watch all their planned set ups go to shit, all because the enemy landed a crit.

You guys are really seething at that fucking word aren’t you?

She's a folded sheet of paper, literally an object with eyes and I doubt more than the two original origami people will even be in the game.

Having a companion has been a rehashed formula since Partners in Time, I don’t see the problem.

You guys seem to have issue with themes as if past games didn’t have themes. The writing is what matters, otherwise people would’ve shat on other designs if this wasn’t the case.

Your running out of shitposting material so you decided to shit on the companions? Don’t be a retard, they were never an issue. Only Kersti for being a bitch and the fact that it was 1 partner the whole game.

Now your changing the subject user. This isn’t anything to actually argue about. This entire thread is a nitpick

nah, I miss based Stuffwell.

>I don’t see the problem.
It was better in SMRPG and SSS when the Mario spoke for him and his interpreters were context sensitive. The Starlows feel like they're leading Mario around more by the hand and speaking on his behalf more than simply accompanying them on their journey. The only ones in that formula that were really executed well were Tippi and Starlow, until appearing after BIS ruined Starlow.