Is it really that bad?

> It takes 7 hours on easy, which everyone plays on
> 9% of the 20 milllion buyers actually finished it

Attached: 90CCBF40-FA31-4A5C-AE9B-770A60554ECC.jpg (256x340, 45.26K)

Other urls found in this thread:

howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=9997
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

For comparison, Horizon Zero Dawn is around 25 hours long & at least 35-40% of people finished it

Its not bad in my opinion having played it like 3 or maybe 4 times. I like Ellie and Joel a lot and the game play is fun for me.

most people dont finish games before "reviewing" them, go check achievements/trophies whatever, morons just buy shit nonstop then call it a "backlog"

So is this why Dark Souls only got 3 goty awards in 2011? Because journalists barely even played it?

chads play on Survivor

Interesting movie, there was a little gameplay here and there but that wasn't too distracting.

It isn't bad, it's mediocre. It does nothing special or creative at all and it's the same puzzles and cover shooting segments repeated over and over again. The problem is that people can't stop sucking this game's dick because "it had a story" and "muh realism"

the main thing is that they give it for free in two generations ps4 and ps3 bundle.
I had one copy because of that and couldn't even finish the first chapter because the game pretty boring,

Horizon was really cool and looked fantastic imo

Attached: 04.jpg (1920x1080, 489.57K)

To be fair, they tried getting creative with the sequel and look how that turned out for them.

The sequel will likely be the most hated game since ME3

>everyone plays on easy
No just faggots with no balls

OP why do you feel the need to lie?

howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=9997

Attached: howlongtobeatlastofus.jpg (878x658, 82.68K)

>"Beasts of air, water, earth..."
>horde of robots comes into view
>"...and steel."
Post yfw you saw that scene for the first time

Attached: whuuuut.png (456x249, 144.75K)

> Literal who website that nobody uses
> Official website that keeps track of every person who ever turned on the game
Cope

Attached: Screenshot_2020-06-08 The Last of Us Remastered Trophies.png (640x435, 715.18K)

Attached: Screenshot_2020-06-09 The Last of Us Trophies.png (1380x413, 1.46M)

> Official website that keeps track of every person who ever turned on the game
my ps3 is offline though i don't think it knows my trophies unless i put it online

Yeah, I had to drop it a few hours in. One of the worst games I've ever played.

I hope so. I hate this new "story driven game" formula because they aren't unique or exciting. They have practically alienated PS1 and PS2 fans from the new shit and I hope this game is a wake up call that games are good because they are fun, not because they're pretending to be movies.

That's just a sign that your taste is trash

Let's just add a 1% margin of error for the people that don't have internet then

Well, his taste is pretty much similar to the 85-90% of people who were just like him and never beat the game, so...

Multiplayer was dope, I'd give it a 10/10. The rest of the game was so-so. Would play again.

For me, it was the kind of game where I had to "make my own fun" to stay interested. The story was good, or good enough. No big complaints. But it wasn't SO GOOD it had me waiting to see what happens next. And that's where the game play kind of let's you down. The levels weren't well designed enough to provide a good variety of challenge and it can be take cover and fire, run to other cover then continue to fire.

I started doing shit like knife only or how many people can I group up and take out with a nail bomb. And that was engaging enough to ride it out until I finished. But I didn't replay and never even thought about the DLC. I'm sure it also had something to do with I'm autistic like that. So no matter what it is if I paid for it I'll suffer through it all on principal.

It wasn't the kind of game you played because it was fun, you just played it because other people talked about it

No man it's not that bad, its a good game, but not the gem people think it's, in other words is overvalued.

This, Witcher 3 is the same way

Journalists pretend playing games.
They just play the demos, get paid then post their reviews based on how much they got paid

Honestly this, you don't actually see their real opinions on those "Best game ever" lists that get published. And even then they will blantantly contradict their own arguments simply to prioritize popular mainstream games over what they actually like.

the game is really good for the first 10 minutes then Sarah dies

>It's 15 hours long
>40% of people who bought it has finished it on at least easy difficulty
Don't make up statistics that are easily Googleable.

Pandering to sjws is not the same thing as being creative bruh

If you skip the cutscenes and ignore walking sections where all you do is talk, the game is closer to ~3 hours for a casual player.

The game is a masterpiece. Cope.

TLOU aproximately sold 6 million copies
TLOU: Remastered sold another 1.5 million copies
Your stats show 700.000 people as game owners

Average completion doesn't mean "game completed", it depends on trophies. Most trophies on this game need you to replay it in other difficulties and search for collectibles or resources or events, and 1/4 of the trophies require you to play the online mode, which I never tried, even though I have all the singleplayer trophies. That explains why the average completion is so low, considering most of the players don't try to get most of the trophies.

>same cover shooting over and over again
play on survivor and be creative shitter