Which is better, W3EE or DDDA?

Which is better, W3EE or DDDA?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 160.79K)

Dark Arisen is such a piece of shit game, and I'm not just saying that because of the threads that are constantly put up. That game is fucking unbearable, there's a reason only 3/4ths of the playerbase make it to the FIRST town, I pushed myself for 12 goddamn hours of that piece of shit, and I can honestly say i'd rather fuck a blender than to ever pick that shitfire of a game back up ever again.

Attached: 1588492951720.png (633x562, 330.26K)

W3 no doubt. Get enhanced edition mod

DDDA is fun to play, W3EE is not

TW3 is the definition of mediocrity.

only one game filters the fuck out of brainlets so

Which is remedied in EE.

Having not played DD yet, what's the reason 1/4th gets filtered before the first town?

You can actually play and get fun with DDDA, IN WITCHER allyou can do is talking

Respawning enemies
Dogshit "kill 15 rabbits" quests
Exploration rewards fuck all besides the ocassional chest with some herbs in them
main quest has you slowly escort caravan across the map to the first town

boredom

ddda purely for combat, just about everything else, story, characters, world, quests, graphics, music yada yada is leagues better in witcher

Dragon's Dogma. It's not even funny.

>not being "engaging"
>Not enough handholding
>One escort mission that takes too long
>Slow paced start
Literally filters ADHD casuals.

Attached: 1584883410041.jpg (614x435, 13.16K)

What is it like getting filtered by a tutorial?

Inventory progression is worse in Witcher.s

Hmm fight system is fun, but after first walkthrough it's ends.

For me it ended at the 4th run.

>Escort mission filters zoomers off of adderall
that's all it is.
I forgot about that mission until you mentioned it.

what's the point of comparing the two?

kek, spot on.

Witcher 3 is better in theory but I got a feeling it won't be remembered and considered a classic like Dragon's dogma. DD is one of those games you can replay every year and never get tired of it. Witcher 3 is a game that works best played around the time of its release that will age poorly.

well if you're debating buying them on switch since they're on sale, why not buy both? DD is 15 bucks, W3 is 41, I wouldn't buy witcher digitally, you should buy it physical so if you end up not liking it or finishing it you could sell it.

Anyone actually played both games all the way through? I only played DDDA and had a blast with it. Considering snatching TW3 now that it's on sale.

TW3 GOTY edition is 5$ rn on gog. DDDA is 4$.

DDDA is far better
Only things Witcher 3 has that DDDA is missing are good sidequests and monster hunts

I have. I had more fun with Dragon's Dogma because the gameplay is actually engaging, but the Witcher's plot kept me going for a long time. Eventually, though, the Witcher's subpar gameplay made me start to feel like the game was a chore and I started trying to finish asap just to see the end of it.

I played through Witcher 3 and did most of the side content but did not quite go for 100%
I did 100% DDDA though and then played some more
Both games are fun but the gameplay in Dragon's Dogma completely BTFOs the gameplay in Witcher 3

dragon’s dogma has better gameplay, witcher 3 has better story and quests. both are pretty great honestly, but I find myself going back to dragon’s dogma for the gameplay and bbi.

I played Dragon's Dogma a year ago, and I'm just now reaching the last mission of W3's DLC. It's true what they say about W3's DLC being great... if the whole game were like that, it might be a closer contest. But as it is, DD is easily the more fun game.

It's all about the gameplay; W3's gameplay is clunky, unresponsive, buggy, and tedious. You only play the game to check things off a list and get some story drip-fed to you, which may or may not be valuable. I've had ~20 crashes and probably 50 deaths/resets from bugs over the course of the game. In DD, the gameplay is far more varied, and there are multiple systems you can experiment with and get very different gameplay results. There are still some bugs, and the game lacks polish in places, but the fundamentals are sound, and it has charm.

Dragon's Dogma would be the better game if it had the same budget.

Attached: 1526820695722.jpg (960x2797, 1.24M)

Dragon's Dogma has excellent combat, encounters, dungeons, loot and enemies. But it has mediocre quests, story and overworld.

The Witcher 3 has really good story, quests, encounters and overworld but shitty combat, enemies, loot and progression.

I think DD has some great characters and an interesting setting but you have to get pretty far into the game before you really see those. I'm sure Witcher's story has a better pace given it's an adaptation.

DD