OH NO NO NO

Alright so it's a remake then.

Dumbass retards.

This is better, atleast its not a a mix of improvements and garbage which makes it or the orgional a hard choice. Now it will just be kusoge

Attached: bluepoint games tries itself at re-envisioning.jpg (445x267, 19.2K)

Americans "fixing" that japanese art again.

Attached: 1591928768331.jpg (1916x1078, 1.61M)

>making a new game distinct from the original
Then why male it RE2 and not just make a new game that is actually distinct from the original?

>Re-envisioning
>Yet still no story, unbalanced bosses, and glitches galore
As expected.

>hey what if we reinvisioned Demon's Souls with the most soulless, generic, and genuinely repugnant art direction ever conceived?

>western team responsible for making Demons Souls
It's fucking over

Bluepoint does it once again.

Attached: lo l3.gif (320x240, 3.54M)

>SONY EXCLUSIVE
OH NONONONO ANOTHER BLOODBORNE CRYING AND WHINING FROM PC FATS INCOMING!

>get rid of archstone, make all worlds connected
>get rid of world tendency
>get rid of soul form, gayest mechanic ever
>fix magic, so Royal class is not easy mode anymore
>add Blooborne mechanic of healing items
that's all I want

you'll get a 1:1 remake in terms of level design and game mechanics and you will like it

All fucking buzzwords.

What's the difference? Does it mean "we'll just use the name and a few concepts" like, it's is a extreme remake (remake already being many "changes" but prioritizing what it was)?

You seem obsessed and seething.

Because RE2's framework is great. Suprise, suprise, it's better than every other game in the series post 3, minus remake.

So this is what they'll call re-released games now huh?

>Zig Forums suddenly loves remakes
How could this happen?

some of the best games ever were reenvisioning of older games. Nothing wrong with that. Of course, sometimes reenvisioned games are complete garbage if made by somebody that sucks.

"It's a re-interpretation"

Attached: shitty old boy.jpg (1148x720, 133.93K)

That's pretty obvious from the trailer.

It was shit on PS3. Its just fromsoftware has some of the most cancerous fans around. You could literally one hit most bosses with that fire skill. It was a clunky mess. There's a reason dark souls was a massive hit and demons souls wasn't

>tfw the game's re-envisioning isn't what you envisioned

Password matchmaking and weapon level based online ranges are going to cause a hilarious amount of asshurt from online secondaries.

>not re-envisioning
>not a remake
>not a remaster

so which one is it then? this only leaves one option, a game that looks the same but is somehow completely unrelated

ports and remasters are the only things nintendo releases
so of course Zig Forums loves them

>Reinvisoned
So... basically it's just a remaster, but instead of just being a HD pack, they completely fuck over the original art direction? That's pretty disappointing. I was hoping this would be a full on remake with new cut content and rebalancing old content to be up to par.
No point in caring anymore when you can just emulate real DeS with 60fps on PC.

>get rid of archstone, make all worlds connected
Sure, let's ruin level design and make it linear like DaS3
>get rid of world tendency
Sure, let's get rid of all punishment and replayability from the Souls series.
>get rid of soul form, gayest mechanic ever
Half health or losing a ring slot isn't convenient enough for me either. Give me eight ring slots and 5% less health instead.

>don't use magic
>problem solved

>There's a reason dark souls was a massive hit and demons souls wasn't
Several actually, the primary ones being the
>2hard4u
reputation that Demon's Souls garnered among casuals and the fact that Dark Souls was multiplat with aggressive
>2hard4u
marketing.

Attached: 1530716312963.png (633x360, 307.33K)

meaning miyazaki won't be involved meaning I don't care about this shit anymore.
fucking monkey paw.

you can bet it will have difficulty settings for all the casuals and """journalists"""

Attached: R4sgbtGDk8.jpg (866x448, 60.04K)