Explain this double standards

Furries are sexually attractive.
Lizardmen are not.

>Ugly Scaley Dykeshit
>Cute furry girl
How hard is it to understand?

Professional studio recolour vs indie dev design
What did you expect.

One is better than the other. This is not a double standard or a logic trick.

One dev designed a character that was attractive and the other dev designed characters that are not attractive. Simple.

one is made by a person who posted child porn, the other was appealing to furries

based

>ugly art style
>shit story
>muh lgbtqabclmaobbq+ representation

>cute fluffy girl
>classic series
>no bullshit, just a cute girl (might be an amputee if the arm is prosthetic)

>Mental illness anime highschool character with a snout glued on in the worst possible way
>New female character for a known and beloved franchise that happens to be a female of a species previously thought extinct
I know you can do better than this, user

Attached: 1556563795732.png (289x307, 157.66K)

Top is low effort CalArts trash and bottom is actually cute. Not even the furfags want top, there's already like 110 images of the new Ratchet girl on e6 and fucking two pictures about Goodbye Volcano High

The top one is cute too. But then you hear what the character says, and listen to the music she produced, and realize she uses "they/them" pronouns, and she becomes repulsive. The top is bad, because their personalities are unlikeable. Poorly written.

I was hyped as fuck for ratchet, but the time portal grpapling thing looks stupid. The female protagonist looks unnecessary

>dinogays living on millions of years of borrowed time just before God punishes them for their gayfag sins with a giant meteor
>qt made for breeding

>last surviving female of a species from one universe meets last surviving male of the same species from another universe
The porn literally writes itself.

Furry is ok when it's actually cute

gay
_______

straight

Zig Forums likes girls and does not like dinosaurs pretending to be girls.

top > ugly tumblur shit
bottom > warm anthro pussy

Attached: 1577617795980.jpg (315x330, 30.13K)

What about dinosaurs that dinosaur?

I thought AWSW was liked by part of Zig Forums

they both suck

Attached: 1523154090365.jpg (640x503, 50.9K)

>top is a 2deep4u faggy tumblr drama made by people who were bullied in high school so that they can create a fictional furry world where they were cool in high school
>bottom is a fun platformer

Like the scene where Ratchet finds her bouncing on human dick

>Comparing a marriable female (left) to a kill on sight monstruosity (right).
Nice comparison. OP is a faggot.

Attached: c1.png (657x658, 608.83K)

nose too big
nose just right

>*marriageable female

>giant pointy mouth
>human head
what a lazy fuckers

Top is the result of designing characters based entirely on ego and not once asking anyone "does this look good?

Bottom is the result of designing a character with the explicit purpose of generating as much porn as possible.

butthurt furfag, kill both

female lombaxes don't have tails

The right actually looks really cute. Just visually speaking. It has this Japanese feel too it. Like cartoon meets kemono. I dig it.
The problem is that her as a character is unlikeable trash.

The thing on the left is just generic western pixar animation.

your pic > very cute

>This projection

Anons find both designs terrible, your image alone proves that because you're using a fan stylized image of fem ratchet that people like vs androgynous zone fem ratchet Insomniac made

Might as well add to it

Attached: Female ratch.jpg (1091x1200, 1003.1K)

hard to earrape a dino

Easy....very easy for a lombax

>VN about gay furries in highschool
>game from a 15 year old IP that defined the platformer genre for a whole generation

>15 year old
R&C is 18 now