>last of us 2 is 10/10, played on very easy mode and ran off of all the encounters to see the meaty cutscenes i didn't liked either
Last of us 2 is 10/10...
Brody Cooper
Other urls found in this thread:
Colton Thomas
>Zig Forums still thinks reviews have to be objective critiques suitable for all audiences
Alexander Martinez
Pls be bait. This can't be real...
Aiden Wood
>I ran from most encounters
>This isn't Splinter Cell
Good bait. Sage.
Anthony Scott
combat in all western games is such shit, playing on easy is the objectively superior choice.
Anthony King
you can play however you want? this is good news. oh, is sony game. you complain. stop to be friendly, idiot?
Hudson Foster
>I ran from most encounters
>This isn't Splinter Cell
Matthew Scott
Yes, that's the point of a review.
It's meant to tell other people about the games qualities and flaws.
Movie reviewers don't say "The movie was good because I liked it."
If you want to give your personal opinion on the game, make a blog.
Ian Russell
>I didn't feel engaged by the combat or steakth
That's a fancy way of saying you're so shit that you can't get immersed due to feeling obstructed by the fact that it's a game.
Owen Parker
A game review isn't a benchmark, it's a record of personal experience. The idea that they all need to be "objective" is why every shit AAA game gets a 9+ score, since that much money and time inevitably produces a product that's technically competent and compelling on at least a rudimentary level.
It's baffling to me that so much of Zig Forums is "SOUL" and "KINO", but then people flip their shit when a critic has an opinion isn't just a technical assessment.
Cameron Morris
WRONG. Reviews are meant to share someones own personal feelings towards a game, someone who is reviewing a game will always bring their own perspectives and experiences to what they're reviewing and it's impossible to be objective. If i'm reviewing a fighting game but I don't like fighting games then my review is from the perspective of someone who doesn't enjoy fighting games, is that for everyone? No, but there are other people like me who don't like fighting games that benefit from someone having that perspective.
Alexander Morales
Review should be is it a good fighting game, not that you like it
Owen Rodriguez
This is the kind of mind numbingly retarded shit you believe in when you grow up part of a generation that would rather watch people play games and react to movies than play games or watch movies yourself. This is genuinely disgusting.
Easton Lee
This.
Ryder Powell
An objective videogame review would just be reading off of a wikipedia article, you can't say you want someone to review a game without actually giving their opinion of it.
Oliver Green
fuck off, hack
Aaron Lee
>NOOO STOP SAYING HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THE GAME STOP DOING YOUR JOB AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Ethan Jenkins
Who even is this fag and how did he get a review copy?
Levi Kelly
fine. your 'everything is subjective' argument is complete bullshit. someone can objectively look at game mechanics, level design, narrative design, character design, and assess whether these are in sync with each other and with the player. you can enjoy a poorly made game or not enjoy a well made game, but someone whose head isn't up their ass can tell the difference between the technical craft and their own personal enjoyment. so in short, fuck off, you fucking hack.
Landon Long
>it's not really about [the gameplay]
holy shit i am dying
Cameron Fisher
objectively speaking the shirt that boy is wearing does not fit
Jack Scott
>someone can objectively look at game mechanics, level design, narrative design, character design
No they can't, someone could very easily enjoy a game mechanic or level or character design someone did not. There are objective things you can mention in a review like if a game mechanic doesn't work properly but that's not the same as assessing the quality of those things assuming they function.
Evan Morgan
>objectively speaking the shirt that boy is wearing does not fit
Objective
>the shirt that boy is wearing does not fit and that's bad because the shirt should fit
Subjective
Jeremiah Gomez
>>hurr durr i enjoy 10fps
>> hurr durr i enjoy bugs
>> hurr durr i enjoy clunky mechanics
eat shit
>someone could very easily enjoy a game mechanic or level or character design someone did not
reading comprehension
Ayden Powell
reviewers are banned form mentioning the main character from the second half of the game.
joel is killed in the first two hours and you never play as him. make sure to preorder to experience abby's story.
Dominic Harris
He's basically confirming it's not a game.
Jaxon Butler
>umm the game is great because it is not the game which is great because I hate games
This guy has to be ironic...right?
Nolan Garcia
>>>hurr durr i enjoy 10fps
>>> hurr durr i enjoy bugs
>>> hurr durr i enjoy clunky mechanics
You can be reductive if you want but there are reviewers that don't care that a game doesn't run at 60 fps and wouldn't lower the score because of it. There's a big difference between just stating "the game runs at 30fps" and saying "The game runs at 30fps and that's bad because it should be at 60" if you want the latter then you aren't looking for a review, you want a report.
Nathan Ramirez
How much onions did you ingest before typing that pile of shit?
James Davis
Give me an example of a non onions objective review
Andrew Garcia
No, that's a ridiculous standard that doesn't exist in other critical circles. No book critic will call a bad book good even if they enjoyed it for some weird subjective reason. No car critic will have a shitbox that they'll call 10/10 because they could throw the shitbox around a corner and not care.
Liam Foster
This guy played on survivor and killed everything
youtube.com
Xavier Stewart
At best you want reviewers to lie about how they feel at worst you want them to not do their jobs. Opinions will always be pervasive in reviews because that is what a review is
Isaac King
>I ran from the gameplay
Jaxon Gomez
>It's not really about that. I ran from most encounters. This isn't Splinter Cell.
How can anyone trust what this guy says after making that statement?
Jaxon Jackson
>Nu-sony
James Hernandez
>No book critic will call a bad book good even if they enjoyed it for some weird subjective reason
A book critic would never consider a reason they like something any more or less subjective than other reasons
Kevin Lewis
>At best you want reviewers to lie about how they feel at worst you want them to not do their jobs.
They are supposed to review the thing as a crafted object, it's not about 'how they feel'. If they want to write about that then they're in the wrong field.
>A book critic would never consider a reason they like something any more or less subjective than other reasons
That is the literal exact definition of subjective. What the hell is wrong with you?