Which game is better?

Which game is better?

Attached: witcher games.jpg (1280x720, 167.36K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=aior8jfINtI&t=
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

3

3

1 = 3 > 2

I like 3 a little more than 1 although it's extremely close, 2 is my least favorite by far.

bring the amazing atmosphere and alchemy system of the first game to the 3rd one and you have the perfect game.

I like 2's characters more but even though the gameplay was an upgrade to 1 it still felt clunky af

1 has most soul

disturbingly based

Play W1 for the best atmosphere and item management system (I love that you don't have to item swap all the item)
Play W2 for the skill system. best skilltree system. Really makes it interesting.
Play W3 for the story, writing and graphics. And GWENT of course.

2

TW1:EE is the only GOOD game in the trilogy.

>even though the gameplay was an upgrade to 1
No, it fucking was not.
TW2 is THE biggest downgrade and casualization in recent history.

The downgrade from 2 do 3 is even bigger, are you crazy?

exactly what I came here to post

W2 by far.

Ι really like how TW3 handles leveling and enemy scaling. It reminds me of Morrowind.

1

Witcher 3 with all the DLC. I really like how colorful Toussaint is. Also the Lady of the Lake quest was kino.

1 with 3 graphics would unironically be the best game in history. Shame CDPR is so fucking lazy to do it.

Wicher-ver you like.

Each is great in their own way and flawed in their own ways.
1 had the best writing but is also quite dated.
2 handled politics the best but had an insane difficulty curve and is super-short compared to the other games.
3 had a beautiful big world to explore but also lots of filler and the writing dropped off late-game though its DLC is fucking godly.

Personally 3's DLC was the most fun I had the series. Followed closely by 1. Still no AAA game has surpassed the Witcher 3 youtube.com/watch?v=aior8jfINtI&t=

Attached: quest chart.png (1364x3157, 549.47K)

3 is the best no question. I've only played 3 but 1 looks boring and very grey. Plus the graphics are like those cheap pc games you got in the 90s. I don't care about 2

Wish Witcher Ciri would have come to visit me even though I romanced Triss. Waifu and Daughterfu together with Geralt would have been the most perfect ending.

Was I right to keep Black Rayla in my army after she murdered 40 dwarf prisoners who had joined the Scioa'tael and I was suppose to deliver back to their families but she argued that letting them go meant they'd only recruit more young dwarves into the Scioa'tael and continue to wage war against humans she's literally the best card in my army and saved my ass so many times.
And she has cute pinchable cheeks.

Attached: black rayla.png (2200x3206, 2.01M)

>3 is the best even though i don’t know anything about 1, 2.

name one other moment as kino as this and the entire Alvin/Jacques character

Attached: kino.jpg (1920x1080, 170.49K)

3, specifically the Hearts of Stone DLC > 1, but very close >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shid, fard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

two has the worst of both games, except roche. Terrible combat, mediocre story outside of the assassin and the 10 seconds you meet best lad Siegfried from the last game (if you carried it over)
3 base game is shit but Hearts of Stone is unironically one of the best stories in videogames at the moment

Attached: Henry's come to see us.jpg (540x413, 20.5K)

Ioverth was fucking sweet and I wish they didnt have to cut him from game 3.

Attached: ioverth.jpg (1191x670, 96.1K)

>squirrel scum
Ok terrorist, scoiatael deserve to have their ear tips cut off

>mediocre story
You just didn’t understand it.

around elves, watch yerselves

1 is a good RPG and a good game overall, definitely deserves to be one of the best games ever made. If you like middle age fantasy atmosphere, with good writing it's a 10/10 game. Not to mention I loved fucking around with alchemy.
2 is a horrible "we want the console audience" game. It's a step back in every single aspect possible, including even the damned UI. Its an abomination for Xbox3niggys.
Never bothered with 3, because every time I gave a chance to open world games I got meme'd on. Not to mention I learned the alchemy is still fucked, instead of improving on the first game's system.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 109.32K)

1>2>3
I'm autist and only rate the overall atmosphere

Yes, 3rd is pretty and has nice music, but main plot sucks arse and all gameplay boils down to following the line on minimap and using witcher senses. Also I don't like it because it has done the same thing to the series as Skyrim did to TES and F4 did to Fallout, and DoW did to 40k

Attached: 1590922015224.jpg (750x738, 27.41K)

3 > 1 > 2

3 has a good story but it's still a console game

What is this witcher sense bullshit anyway? In 1 you have a medallion which start to shake when magic or monsters are nearby. It's perfectly fine for this type of game, especially when there is detective work to do.

Bloede Dh'oine

Attached: 20200409105616_1.jpg (1920x1080, 352.39K)

2 > 3 > 1
I love 1 don't get me wrong, and each game does something better than the other two. 1 is the most traditionally comfy, but 2 has a better story and is paradoxically comfier once you get past some of the uncomfy hurdles like Triss being kidnapped, being in an army camp for one path of chapter 2 and 3, takes two or three playthroughs.
3 does most of what 1 did but slightly better (except 1 feels more dangerous, even inside the city).
For the record I use to hate 2, and in my opinion if you hate 2 currently you just haven't cracked it yet.

3+DLC>1>3>2

1 also had witcher senses that was even cheaper. If you held the alt key every object you could interact with would be labeled on the screen.

3's main story would've been better if these were the main villains. The Wild Hunt was boring.
>but muh books
I dont care about the books

Attached: 20200410045250_1.jpg (1920x1080, 472.35K)

It would've been kino if they had cut that retarded line.
At that point in the game anyone knows the significance of drawing his silver sword, completely unnecessary to call it out.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 169.1K)

I like how unashamedly slav he looks in the first game.

That's not witcher senses. Every Bioware game has it.

Gervant has magical autism that lets him to concentrate really really hard

He did it passively in previous games (like counting elfs by the sound of their breathing in 2nd), but for 3rd game CDPR decided to make this an active ability. It would be cool, if they hadn't overused it.

A lot of 3rd person RPGs have it, user. Divinity OS 1 and 2, Dragon Age, PoE - to name a few. It is done so that player wouldn't pixelhunt like it's an adventure game from early 90s