That looks awful

>yellow filter
>dead and empty towns
>horrible combat
>trash AI

why is this game praised so much here exactly?

Attached: 2423452346.jpg (400x250, 26.45K)

Enjoyable quest chains and go anywhere and do whatever you want style I guess. I liked it but never thought it was that good anyway.

OP is a faggot.

you need high double digits amount of mods, then you can play

immersive quests and good dialogue from memorable characters, of course the AI and combat's gonna be shit, it's using the fallout 3 engine

Your skills and choices matter. Solid worldbuilding and writing.

>why is this game praised so much here exactly?
Because this place is full of pseudo-intellectuals and NV panders extensively to those sorts with braindead political posturing.

>games are about politics
>insulting others as pseudo-intellectual

lol says the fucking contemporary politics propaganda victim, fuck off.
This game isn't about politics, because you make your own choices. Your own choices aren't about politics, unless you make them about politics.

Sub-80 IQ specimen thinking he's something special because he found this very hidden elite hacker site 2 years ago and is acting contrarian.

Mods turn vegas from an 7/10 to a 10/10 game, everything which you just complained about can be fixed with mods

> go anywhere

NV wasn’t even an open world game

>game is all about arguing what is the best political system to take over the role of government for the region
>HURR DURR THE GAME ISN'T ABOUT POLITICS AT ALL UNLESS YOU MAKE IT SO
You're a fucking idiot. Exactly what is to be expected of the NV fanbase.

The combat and AI was 100% worse than FO3

>Just mod it

Everytime

Wrong

The awful combat, the pretentious dialogue, the empty grey donut map

>why is this game praised so much here exactly?

Attached: NostalgiaGoggles.png (459x453, 141.07K)

Invisible wall barriers

Attached: Easy_Pete.jpg (800x571, 148.41K)

Roleplaying elements are really well made and the dialogue is generally well written, with exceptions of course

You can fix the combat and add new enemies and locations to the world, if you're that peeved off by dialogue above a 3rd grade bethesda level than this game isn't for you

Attached: fallout 3.jpg (1280x720, 64.84K)

>[Speech 100] Plz no attack
>K
Outstanding, game of the decade

So it’s not really NV anymore then if the core mechanics have been changed to the game, new locations and enemies have been inputted. You’re basically playing out someone’s fan fiction.

You guys are idiots. It's obvious that OP is troll

BULL

so at what point did you guys realize this guy was really the only logical choice?

Attached: 1566997355953.jpg (284x177, 5.69K)

BASTARD

>theres 2 (TWO) New Vegas threads on the front page

This game is over ten years old. Just shows how much of a masterpiece it is

only priased by Shitsidian fanboys

It's a shit game. Far worse than Fallout 3. But it has a few funny "epic memes" like "muh theoretical physics"

One of the main things that were praised was the fact they handled slavery so well and it was so evil. That should give you the idea of the types that praise the game

Oh goody all the Fallout 4 praisers are here

Attached: 1570058679689.jpg (771x807, 96.19K)

The game has a slow start. I felt exactly the same way a couple weeks ago when I picked it up again after quitting early on. It really does get better. The story starts to really take hold when you get to Vegas. Just keep playing would be my advice. Yes, the game is far from perfect but it's still amazing.

playing through it for first time right now and i like it alot, and i hated fallout 3/dropped it in first couple hours. it is drab but what would you expect from a place destroyed by nukes? i don't think a vivid color palette would fit that well.

The narrative and design are so good that they hold all of the shit Gamebryo jank together.

Zig Forums spends a lot of time discussing a fuck load of old games. Especially ones that are around 10 years old. I think that says more about the changing demographics of this site and how bad video games are these days than it says about how good those games are.

>glance at this blurry as fuck image
>reverse search it
Why use an image this low quality for a low quality thread?

Attached: 3CCC75B3-1921-40E7-B44B-8469FF7FFFBD.jpg (640x674, 231.29K)

does the fact that you reverse searched it play into your story in some way, or did you just want to boast how big of an image searcher you are?

Would you prefer to be surrounded by the ocean like any other openworld game out there?

It was slightly better than Fallout 3, this gives people with no life a feeling of superiority for some reason.

Only memorable thing about characters and dialogs was how shit they were.

Why the fuck pick an obscure ass walkthrough with a low quality screenshot to complain about video games?
>is on Zig Forums
>has a life
Normalfag

romans in football gear
soldiers
lesbians with giant fists
sex robots
plasma guns
revolvers
gambling
drugs
monsters
zombies
cowboys and indians
giant scorpions
sasparilla

the game has everything and then some

Objectively false.

The point when I realised colonizing the moon would be way doper than sitting around on this shitty rock with the rest of the plebs for the rest of my life.

the repconn museum confirms he always had an interest in space travel, nice touch

The menu is a bit if a headache with all the ammo types and components for craftingcluttering it up but that's my only issue really that I cant overlook