Unpopular opinion: single player games are not games. They are puzzles or maybe adventures...

Unpopular opinion: single player games are not games. They are puzzles or maybe adventures. A video game can only be a true game if it has at least two people playing against each other.

Attached: steve.jpg (861x720, 141.02K)

don't you have some shark cards or tf2 hats to buy, lil zoom?

>true game if it has at least two people playing against each other
>what is solitaire

Attached: idiot.png (387x54, 14K)

>what is solitaire
A puzzle.

I want Steve Harvey to join the smash roster

a memorable adventure maks a video game. Are you tarded

This is the opinion of a casual retard who uses video games to fill the void created by lack of social interaction and competitive sport.

>Tetris:The Grand Master
>Rhythm games like IIDX or GITADORA
>Literally every RPG
>Roguelikes like FTL

Even shit like The Stanley Parable is a video game

Are you stupid, son?

NAME SOMETHING A GAMER WOULD NOT WANT TO SEE WHEN HE PLAYS A SEQUEL TO A GAME HE LIKES

Exact opposite opinion, multiplayer games are a complete waste of time.

spoilers

Of all the dumbest shit I've seen on this site this is the most retarded thing I've ever read.

This

Puzzles are games.

So what you're saying is single player games are games

new developer

Puzzles are games retard

women

That's clever. You're clever

Attached: 1549475487867.jpg (960x912, 172.59K)

Play Persona 4 Golden and stop being a cuck

>Shit opinion

FTFY

Also OP is a mega cock gobbling faggot.

But you’re playing against a team of humans who designed the game and the challenges therein.

You're right, that is an unpopular opinion OP. It's a wrong one too.

Partially agree, all single player games do boil down to solving a puzzle. Even in something like a roguelike, there's a limit to just how much the AI can do, leading to a discrete set of actions that can be further narrowed down to an optimal set for the best chance of success.

Multiplayer games have a similar issue with a vastly expanded action set. Eventually, the evolution of the game causes a meta to develop, limiting the effective action set down to a point where there's only a few optimal ways to play. Assuming that you chose one of these optimal strategies, the match outcome is simply a dice roll based on what your opponent has chosen; if a strategy could be countered without fail every time, it would never be picked. If it would succeed each time, there would never be a reason not to pick it. Thus, eventually all games boil down to randomness after a certain skill level.

Shut the fuck up you mouthbreathing retard.

They are puzzle GAMES or adventure GAMES.
They are not puzzles, like you build on your table.
They are not adventures, like you have while hiking.
They are objectively video games.

A Nintendo board like Zig Forums will not agree with this post, but you’re right.

the original gameplay completely changed

>unpop opinion thread actually started with something unpopular and infuriating
Yeah, I'm thinking based.

>competitive sport
Name a single player game where the AI learns from its mistakes, adapts, and tries to beat you like a human opponent would.

What is "Alien: Isolation"?

Attached: 1587955886947.png (592x900, 252.05K)

chess

Ignorance isn't a point of view

seething tlou tranny

>steve falls to the floor and sets himself on fire while screaming LAWD JESUS

I guess fuck calling all the old Mario and Zelda games a game I guess...

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASED
Even single player games with friends is way more fun, and possibly even the way they should be played.