Are normies finally realizing that almost all AAA games suck massive cock and that reviewers can't be trusted?

Are normies finally realizing that almost all AAA games suck massive cock and that reviewers can't be trusted?

Attached: 1.png (2050x1384, 779.62K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=UBKP2Q2UkBw
youtube.com/watch?v=P9LV2uq9aOQ&t=38s
youtube.com/watch?v=VqKYxhRQIfo
youtube.com/watch?v=iULk1GLo9hY
youtube.com/watch?v=odE-A-LVZoQ
youtube.com/watch?v=5-zK5_UhPXM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

hopefully

youtube.com/watch?v=UBKP2Q2UkBw
youtube.com/watch?v=P9LV2uq9aOQ&t=38s
youtube.com/watch?v=VqKYxhRQIfo
youtube.com/watch?v=iULk1GLo9hY
youtube.com/watch?v=odE-A-LVZoQ
youtube.com/watch?v=5-zK5_UhPXM

Attached: 1592651316879.png (1115x709, 1.23M)

>almost all AAA games
You showed a small list of games, user.
Screw that, I wanted to bring up Pokemon
Sword base game as an example for a lazy minimum effort job that can be somewhat entertaining that normies are satisfied with, but the Metacritic is at 4.6, so that's nice.

Attached: Capture.png (910x429, 140.2K)

even if they have doesn't really matter because they're gonna keep buying them anyway. I don't really care either to be honest because I have so much stuff in my backlog. I would probably be fine with never playing a video game released after current year

Oh but "user" reviews spam bombed by bots also can't be trusted.

>Are normies finally realizing that almost all AAA games suck massive cock and that reviewers can't be trusted?
These games keep selling millions of copies so obviously not

They're only copying what their favourite youtubers and streamers say. NPCs don't have a mind of their own.

I wonder if the japs hate the game too. I know they liked the first game which is rare for a AAA western game to do well over there and the first LoU did well over there.

This
>Pokemon Sword and Shield are shit, Game Freak should be ashamed
>oh, but I bought the game anyway because it's Pokemon

Where's the proof on that besides ten random people saying so on twitter or a minuscule fraction of the reviews being memes?

god damn i miss the days when aa games could exist

Reception for Survive would've been better if it didn't have "Metal Gear" tacked on to it.

most nips turned it off during the weed scene

It's pretty obvious when there are campaigns (like on this website) to review bomb the game.
The game sucks, but you don't have to feign stupid about the possibility of people shitting on the reviews to make a point.

>saw a playthrough to see how garbage it is
>saw the guy went through the options and saw a "skip puzzle option"
Holy shit what the hell was that an option. In fact I wouldn't even say the game has puzzles when most of the time it just feels like you're wasting your time trying to find the exit than solving anything difficult. Man how can these fags just keep using this medium to keep making these pretentious hand holding movie games? Also that revenge plot in the end made the entire game pointless, ellie goes through killing a bunch of people just for her to go "nah I won't kill you and get my revenge because I'm better than you lmao". What's even fucking point of killing off joel then?

Attached: 1562454295487.jpg (431x431, 13.79K)

It was a janky survival multiplayer game, we already have tonnes of them. Without Metal Gear in the title it would've immediately been lost in its sea of numerous contemporaries

Spider-Man had the "skip puzzle" option too. These are the games that normalfags but on a pedestal. These are meant to be the shining beacons of AAA single-player games

Attached: 1592621562936.jpg (640x360, 27.51K)

>0.6

It's almost impressive how much people DESPISED reforged.

Attached: kek buttowski.png (600x528, 343.9K)

Modern warfare is a good game

It's totally deserved. Reforged stopped people from playing the version of the game that actually worked.

>combat accessibility
this "accessibility" stuff is getting out of hand.

Only if you're a zoomer.

>how to make your game even less fun 101
This game bearly has any challenge to it, why the hell would you just make it worse?

I haven't got a problem with games doing it. Devs can make their games how they want. I just hope other devs don't get ridiculed for not including all of these options as well

They completely failed to do what they promised in terms of cinematics.
The game is terribly buggy and crashes.
They broke the original game that worked just fine.
And they retroactively claimed ownership of every custom map and mod made for original WC3 as well as anything new made in the editor.

No, they just assume the games are review bombed and play anyway. If the user scores were actually kind of middling they might reconsider, you stupid faggots make it too obvious.

im still so fucking mad about w3

I like how they added a jump mechanic that doesn't offer many use of it and the game could have still worked without one

and the jumping is janky as fuck

Correction it was a janky survival multiplayer game in the fox engine that was fun. The best part of MGSV was the gameplay and that was what Survive was.

Normies are too busy playing GTA online to care about this little drama

I only pay for games with a user score > critic score

Attached: Capture.png (683x319, 75.91K)

Attached: Ea6UlvvXQAA1Jhp.jpg (922x457, 31.49K)

You can click the accounts making reviews, theyre not white nationalists out to ruin your fun retards

he's right about the game being cringe from the get-go and how boring it is in general

It's like RPG maker porn games that have a "I JUST WANNA SEE SEX" option that disables combat/puzzles. Fucking pathetic

A lot of people say that sequels or remakes ruin the original work, and this is almost always hyperbolic and frankly absurd.
Reforged is one of the few times where you really can say that the original was ruined.

>Modern Warfare
top kek. if you look through reviews, it's a bunch of russians angry that the game makes russians look bad