IS A MAN NOT ENTITLED TO THE SWEAT OF HIS BROW?

IS A MAN NOT ENTITLED TO THE SWEAT OF HIS BROW?

Attached: IntroSlide2.png (634x459, 448.01K)

get married and have some kids
see if you're entitled to anything.

Why are Libertarians so cringe?

Your children are then entitled to the sweat of your brow, not the government

That's not the point

who said so?

When are leftists going to get this game banned?

you want me to drink my sweat?

cuck

I did, fuck you

Me

how old are you lmao

In real life.
Would Andrew Ryans type of government work?
IIRC it only failed because of plasmids.


What type of goverment was it anyways?

I don't think that Bioshock is supposed to teach you that libertarianism is good

wot

Yeah

Your kids are your own fault. The gubment is not.

alright well ill let you know how it goes

Yes but you are not entitled to the sweat of other people's brow, porky.

Attached: trust-me-goyim.gif (256x300, 13.92K)

Me. I am Andrew Ryan, and I'm here to ask you a question. Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?

man I remember the intro to Bioshock being so special at the time, every other nerd was jerking off to the game.
I was one of them and watching the intro again fills me with nostalgia

Attached: rapture.jpg (1200x600, 52.91K)

in a community where the labor is intended to help one another get ahead in life, and not for financial gain - yes it is

We can't even make jokes about video games without people autisticly reeeeing about poltics

ahahahahah what an absolute fucking idiot

libertarianism
no, it doesn't work, because just telling everyone to act in self-interest with no societal pressures to actually force them to work for a collective interest rapidly results in the degeneration and destruction of your society.
See: Kowloon Walled City.

It would collapse due to infighting, plasmids or not.

Attached: hqdefault (3).jpg (480x360, 42.99K)

So your principles go out the window the moment they stop serving your desired outcome? How hypocritical.

Society doesn't have to exist for the individual to

who said that? I sure didn't. I said a community that acts for its own self interest is heavily reliant upon one another - thus the labor you all commit to is meant to help each other get ahead. A tribe.

>tfw will never experience comfy life in rapture and have plasmid enhanced sex with my short haired wife

Attached: rpt.png (1280x507, 681.64K)

No says the (((democrat)))
It belongs to the niggers

Based.
If you can't live by your own sweat and think yourself entitled to that of others, then you'll end up drowning with them.

No says the (((Republican)))
it belongs to the government

You aren't obligated to a tribe any more than you are a government or a corporation. It's the same thing in all cases, trying to leech off of what is rightly owned by somebosy else.

tomorow

A tribe is a collective in a spirital sense, beyond the material. you work together for the mutual benefaction of one another, not for a one-up or for material gain. very simple stuff

Wrong.
Humanity is a social animal. It thrives upon existing in a society.
In fact, it is uniquely predisposed to doing so among social animals (not hive animals or other extremely simple creatures), choosing to live in cultures thousands or even millions strong with only minimal strife.
No other animal is capable of this.
And one human cannot excel at everything. The progress of one can be used to the advantage of all, and that same one benefits from the progress of others.
That's why we aren't still living in caves, afraid of mammoths and big cats.

The last time OP had a sweat it was trying to get his fatass off his couch.

It has to be agreed on by all parties involved. Nobody is "entitled" to it and anyone involed is free to walk away at any time.

Society exists purely to put you in a box and funnel you through a series mechanisms, the individual is not born into these, these are constructed by man prior to your birth and as a result you are robbed of the very nature intended for you.

And all parties involve agree because the general collation of the unit benefits everyone involved.

because none of them actually work hard, if they did they'd be capitalists because even a capitalist admits they can't do everything without a consumer or worker to obtain or create it.

Except when it doesn't and they break away. Which will happen because life is not ideal and people scapegoat each other all the time just to survive.

You need to look at tribes that still exist to understand. they are not corrupted by greed like we are in the west.

No nature was ever intended for me except the genetic programming to ACCEPT society as participating in it gives me a better chance of surviving and reproducing.

This here

That retard outta look at the Calhoun rat experiments or uncle teds manifesto and then tell us how great it is for humans to be part of society

No, nature was intended to heighten you spiritually and make you ascend, society and its greed corrupts your soul and distracts you from your ultimate purpose

I'm not talking about greed, I'm talking about real life being unfair. Say there's a particularly hard winter and nobody has enough food. They then agree that one person must be sacrificed, as food for the rest, so they can survive. Do you think that person is going to agree with being eaten? Do you think they have the right to exploit and murder that individual for the "greater good"?

Don’t bother man leave him be to become a husk for society it gives him a dopamine rush

Heres another hypothetical, say you planned for winter with your tribe and successfully managed to store enough food as to not starve. because as you know, a tribe can work together and grow their own crops / manage their own livestock. Why should they sacrifice anyone when they're smart enough to prepare on their own? i don't need big brother to help me survive a winter, all i need is my kinsman. thats a tribes purpose.