So, why is it okay to like a fanmade character if she's a slim female femdobait, but a fat male inflationbait character deserves nothing but despise? Isn't this extremely hypocritical? What's even worse, the guy on the left paid $1000 and the girl paid only $500 for Muffet. Yet one gets an obligatory boss fight, her own room, a bunch of spider foreshadowing throughout the story, appears in the credits. And the other one gets what? A hidden boss fight you can only see a single day at a single hour IN THE ENTIRE YEAR. Seriously, what the fuck is up with this?
So, why is it okay to like a fanmade character if she's a slim female femdobait...
Muffet is not a fetish character. Yes her fans portray her that way as it appeals to them, but she was never created with that intention nor does she get any sort of fanservice. So Sorry on the other hand is a LITERAL fetish character created for the explicit purpose of creating porn.
Go to DeviantArt or FurAffinity and notice how easy it is to find characters exactly like the left and how hard it is to find characters like the right.
>So, why is it okay to like a fanmade character if she's a slim female femdobait, but a fat male inflationbait character deserves nothing but despise?
The answer is contained within the question.
because her design is actually amazing, I'd go so far as to say she might have the best character design in that game, to the point I'm surprised she's a backer character.
/thread
>Right: Normal character
>Left: Furfag fetish bait
>complaining about Muffet
literal faggot
Because it's a more interesting design than the one on the left? It really isn't that hard to understand why people would like that over the 1000th fat lizard thing
>Isn't this extremely hypocritical?
No
>game is about tolerating others
>game hides it's biggest 'monster'
When's butter dragon getting his own game?
I find it hard to believe people complain about furry fetish characters in a furry game that lets you date furries made by a homosexual twink who ERPs as a dog.
Fatfetish faggot bait versus cute character created to be cute without fetish.
Incidently everyone fetished the fuck out of her because she was cute.
And not fat fetish bait.
If the guy on the right was thin and cute, and completely unrelated to fatshit, he would have tons of porn made of him.
Good point, lets not forget that by far the single most sexualized character in all of undertale is a fat skeleton.
being a hypocrite doesn't make you wrong
Because the thing on the right is revolting in just about every way possible. I want to destroy it. If it was easily accessible in the normal game I would never be able to get a true pacifist run because I would not be able to stop myself from killing that thing.
>right
Stupid fucking Kangaroolander
The spider looks like a loli, No idea why some fanart gives her boobs.
Even if she's not exclusively a fetish character, the bondage and vore undertones are fucking obvious. Meanwhile what's So Sorry's problem? He's chubby? The character itself doesn't do anything fetichistic
>the bondage and vore undertones are fucking obvious
No they aren't. She's a spider. They tie up and eat people, non sexually.
He molests the player with his tail. Yes, that's part of the fetish attached to the character. Depraved stuff!
Who fucking cares?
The author behind her made an entire rant against people who kept sexualizing Muffet
Fuck, my bad. Yeah, I meant the ugly fat rat on the left not the cool looking spider lady.
this is where the thread should end but people will sweep this post under the rug for free internet points that don't get saved
So Sorry's problem is that he's fucking bland and shitty. You can find literally 10s of thousands of fat generic lizards/furries on e621 or deviantart.
Muffet is a singular character whose silhouette is immediately recognizable. Tell me how many cute fancy spider girls holding multiple tea cups you can find on DeviantArt of FurAffinity or E621
oh wait they're all Muffet because she's actually a character
get back in your general
>So Sorry apologist
how embarrassing
She did? Doesn't she literally make porn of her characters too, that makes no sense
>fat male
there is absolutely nothing appealing about fat males, they are disgusting and it is unnatural to be fat and male. There's a reason that most NTR fetish porn features the girl getting fucked by a fat man, because fat men are disgusting so it's degrading.
Been on both, both are fairly prevalent desu. If anything Muffet gets degenerated a lot
She doesn't.
She's on Diives levels of being attached to their OCs,seething eternally if someone makes porn of their SFW OCs
Do you... know what a spider is?
Muffet
>Creator worked hard with Toby to make a fun, engaging boss with an interesting design
>Did not insist on fetishbait content
>Paid for an actual tier in the kickstarter
>Creator didn't intend for muffet to be a fetish character, gets mad about all the porn of her
So Sorry
>Creator tried his hardest to keep his character inserted as it was, a fetish self-insert
>Insisted on fetish shit in his boss fight and various fetish content
>Paid for a joke tier in the kickstarter, angrily refused the refund Toby offered
>character is literally his fetish fursona all about macrophilia, foot fetishism, vore, and weight gain - a GREAT character to put into a kid's game!
The design choices are fucking night and day.
The problem with SoSorry is that he was literally the creator's fat fetish OC. Even if his battle has nothing to do with the fetish, it's fucking jarring knowing that fact
If it wasn't the guy's kink self insert, and was just some regular one off monster, no one would really bat an eye
Yeah, that's MUFFET. Find me the tens of thousands of OCs exactly like Muffet.
>paying a developer so you can work on their game
Diives makes OCs and not just bad gifs of licensed stuff?
Proof? Last time I checked she was angry because some trannies told her she was making porn of underage characters or something
If you look at a spider and immediately think about vore and bondage you need therapy for your porn addiction.
Lolita fashion was actually created by women in order to displease men and ward off being sexualised
I mean, paying to have a representation of >you in a kickstarter is pretty standard.
There's another great example of good OC vs shit OC in another kickstarter game.
Says the guy who looks at a chubby dragon and immediately thinks about furry porn
vs
That's literally what his character was made for though
kek
If So Sorry was simply a fat dragon I would think nothing about it, hell Alphys is in the game and she's a fat dinosaur and I don't associate her with fetishes. The difference here between Muffet and So Sorry is So Sorry is literally a character MADE around fetishes. So Sorry could look like a stickman and have the same fetish history and I'd still hold the same level of disgust.
I mean in terms of pure looks from their sprites they both look fine. Just that one was created for the game and the other was their fetish kink fursona.
The guy should have atleast made another fursona or something
>he hasn't taken the bazpill
>he doesn't know about Zubaz
>generic fat furry #217741701471
>gothic lolita spider obsessed with tea wearing victorian style pantaloons and shoulder pads
yeah I wonder why people would like the character on the right more, what a mystery, both of these characters definitely have equal merit and had equal thought put into their design. not like one is way more unique and has a completely distinct silhouette.
you're talking out of your ass. you can easily find the porn she's done of her own OCs. the only reason she doesn't draw the porn now, publicly anyway, is because she even got harassed and stalked by tumblr faggots for it who were calling her a pedo