It's getting bad scores bc THQ posted on Baitchan

Where is the lack of critical thinking of this person to not immediately fix the problem? I can understand getting caught up the first and maybe even second time, but wouldn't it just makes sense after that to back up?

>The game might be bad, but 2/10 is clearly due to the ch8an thing
Is that why THQ's Desperados game got an 80 on MC?
metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/desperados-iii/critic-reviews
You niggers need to get a grip. Not everything revolves around your faggot culture war.

>americans

obsessed kike

stop making excuses and accept the possibility that journos all have shit taste

Someone didnt get the chance to Play BfBB when younger

The worst part about this is that going by the context in the review, he's literally doing this on purpose to try and point out a "flaw" with the bubble bowl having spongebob move during the windup. Boggles me as to how this is a flaw when the solution is so simple.

obsessed

I couldn't care less about this game, but trusting reviewers is retarded.

Ah, yes, review bombing is certainly a valid metric for quality.

We're half the board, lad.
How do they grade shit where you come from, then?

It's incredible how easy it is to milk nostalgiafags.

I can accept that the game isn't great, but that doesn't make the gamespot review anything but fucking pathetic.

>the game is objectively superior to the original
>but they didn't disregard the original to change the game to be like a modern platformer
>2/10
Fuck off with that. That's the worst reason ever to score a game low.

>the game is objectively superior to the original
It's not, though

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 13.49K)

>its incredible how easy it is to milk nostalgiafags

Attached: 1587514242616.jpg (918x904, 137.1K)

I didn't say that it was. But even though I was paraphrasing, the reviewer essentially did in his review.
The review is kind of schizophrenic as fuck because half of it is praising the remake but then he goes off into a tangent about how the remake didn't change the game and then he slapped a terrible score onto it.

I got locked out of 100% completion due to the game being a rushed, buggy mess.

I don't blame any reviewer who gives it such a low score.

ive never played it but its looks linear with the gameplay

>wojak posting
>Not bothering to actually reply to the user.
Wojakniggers need to be lined up and shot. I'm not even joking. You faggots ruined Zig Forums. Anytime someone says anything that goes against the grain here, some nigger has to greentext him with a wojak. And what's even worse is that soijak is the only obe that gets used anymore. I hope each and every one of you dies a slow painful death. I hope your mothers get raped violently by their relavtives and then have to abort the abomination via coathanger. I hope your dog gets his intestines sucked out of him and then eaten. I hope your sister gets raped by a pack of niggers. I hope your father loses his job and is forced into prostitution.
And most of all, I hope wojak posting gets an automatic ban. You faggots are the cancer of this site and we need the chemo.

Attached: mZkmzZm.jpg (720x444, 32.66K)

60 was actually an F when I was in school, but school grades are weighted anyway.

NOOOOO FUNKY JOSEPH GAVE IT A 2/10??!?!?

did the day one patch drop

>wojak bad

Attached: 1539019798098.png (980x1892, 299.92K)

This game IS unplayable on switch

why the fuck does this black family have white grandad in the commercial?

youtu.be/V1iyBfjgjxk

Attached: 1586051628793.png (957x530, 908.54K)

Definitely american

>wojak bad
YES

Based

>wojak bad
Yes, yes it is. You're a retard if you haven't realized this.

I doubt he is actually that retarded, he is pretending to be retarded to justify giving it a low score for the 8ch thing