Whats Zig Forums's opinion on Legends, Anniversary, and Underworld?

Whats Zig Forums's opinion on Legends, Anniversary, and Underworld?

Attached: tombraider.png (848x350, 582.3K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/u_TPohRfGcc?t=197
youtu.be/iyVHV7ct4gU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

peak tomb raider
everything before them is jank and everything after is zoomer shit

Attached: tomb-raider-underworld-13132.jpg (1024x576, 116.58K)

If you were 5-10 years older you'd be saying everything after 1-5 is zoomer shit
which it is

Lara kino

Attached: tru handstand.webm (800x450, 482.06K)

They were all good. The new ones are just not Tomb raider.

Except chronicles and AoD

I fucking love Legends

How is the PC port? Does it hold up?

it runs the same as in a console, the games are still pretty fun, much better than the new ones imo, but they're more puzzle/exploration focused instead of action

I remember liking this one, played on PS2

Attached: Tomb_Raider_-_The_Angel_of_Darkness.png (283x350, 174.02K)

far better than "survivor" shit tomb raider

i fucking LOVE watching lara's ass. why the new titles try so hard to avoid this?

That one is pretty much universally agreed to be the worst one, if you liked it you'll love any of the other games.

Underworld has an annoying bug when you dont use Vsync the physics boxes fly all over the fucking place.

why wouldn't you use vsync anyway?

I remember IGN did a video review of Underworld and ended it with a close up of Lara's tits

youtu.be/u_TPohRfGcc?t=197

the new ones are just trying to be more grounded and be taken seriously as an art rather than a comic book tier game.

Why was it bad?

The best ones. Should've continued with these instead of nu-Lara

Back in 2008 when it came out I was using a 24 inch Sony CRT with a really high refresh rate and didn't want to be locked at 60

Oh shit well I don't remember much of it at all except maybe something to do with Louvre or some shit? Like you have to dodge lasers in Paris and go to a nightclub.

It was the controls as well as the contrived "skills" & RPG elements that sucked ass. The plot wasn't completely wank it had some memorable sections that I too look back fondly on.

If this was nu-Lara, that would be a QTE sequence where the ledge would crumble and she would fall, struggling to find something to grab. Finally she would grab a branch or something and take a minute to get up while staining herself with sweat, dirt, or her own blood. If you failed the QTE, she would be impaled, burned, or some other gruesome death.

>universally agreed
soo..retards decided this?

Classic Lara:
>strong and brave hero
>feminuts call her problematic
nu-Lara:
>eternally frightened victim
>feminuts call her strong and brave

is there any coomer art of Lara as good as like this? I thought I remember seeing some really good Lara coomer art

Attached: 1592449833776.jpg (1310x1800, 269.13K)

I swear the devs are into guro and ryona
youtu.be/iyVHV7ct4gU

Didn't they at some point say that the new Lara would eventually turn into the old one?

anniversary has the best port i replay it every year its amazing they did a really good job
underworld is fun but you might have some camera issues

There's a ton of good coomer art. You just need to keep searching.

Attached: lara_croft_by_devilhs.jpg (1024x1904, 262.76K)

me too, first game I played on my new computer in 2004. hottest lara for me too

it's Lara Croft, of course there is.

It was assumed that she became strong, confident, old Lara after the first game but they kept making the sequels survival games like the first one with weak, meek, new Lara.

Because it was different to all the games that came before and had a ton of technical issues, I remember the load times being insanely long on PC, PS2 was probably even worse.
Yes, but that's how everything works, the majority decides what is good.