Do you agree?

He's a hack who should stop playing bad games.

Yes, they are when you spend the majority of your time on twittershit and Zig Forums instead of actually playing them, fucking normalcumguzzlers.

Im more likely to finish a short indie game than any AAA game so I guess hes correct.

who gives a fuck what twitter faggot journalists think

Has he ever read a book?

I've put 50-100 hours into games that never felt like it because they were fun.

If a game feels long it's probably because it's just bad.

I'm not a casual who plays single player shit.

Only if the game sucks

no and fuck this pussy faggot who gives a shit what twitter tards think

>movie games are too long
Fixed.

Attached: illust_57123505_20200423_080317.jpg (700x900, 247.25K)

I dont mind long games, It only take more time to beat them. All of my favorit books are 800+ pages long

Yes, totally. Modern games being so long makes the gameplay shit, because they have no replayability anymore, apart from exploration.

Back then when games were short, they had very good replayability instead. I prefer this a lot more.

> Video games are too long

Bad Take.

> Most of AAA games had lots of filler to inflate hours of play and overcharge for them.

True.

I have to say that the length of some RPGs really is a turnoff for somebody like me. 10 hour games work fine for me.

This.

I have had zero interest in playing those ultralong western AAA games for years now, so I guess I do.
Nope.

RPGs are too long, more specifically.

pretty shitty to say this without stating what kind of videogames

>Most of AAA games had lots of filler to inflate hours of play and overcharge for them.
That's what he means you autist

Most books take less time to read than some video games take to finish tbqh.

they aren't long enough for costing so much but retards think the opposite because publishers spend so much on marketing

thats like saying books are too long, or movies. what an empty fucking statement

imagine getting paid to review or report on video games and you still complain like a bitch.

Yeah, way many games are 50+ hours when they don't deserve to be. The word "value" in terms of videogamea was a mistake. Even games like Bloodborne has parts like the vampire castle which were clearly padding.

Only a fucking consumerist would say something like this. This is the kind of faggot who would happily pay 100 USD for a 4 hours game.

Video games need to be like Hollywood films so my uncle Ira and cousin Maury can get jobs in the industry.

This is a fundamental sort of truth. Bad games are too long, good games are too short. When a game is good you can play it for 100 hours and never say "this is too long",

I do. I really do wish there were some triple AAA experiences that were more brisk, and also costed a little less.

People freak out if you suggest this though. But I think shorter game with lower price is fair, and there really isn’t anything like that outside of indies. As an adult you don’t have time to dedicate 40 hours for every single game. I’m actually excited to play Resident Evil 3 remake because I heard it’s a brisk 6 hours. No bullshit.

Attached: 2109FAA2-1DDA-41A1-B485-13DCD7BEEB04.jpg (1280x720, 80.38K)

>Do you agree
Yes. I am sick an tired of this filler content bullshit. I'd rather play a sold 25 hour game than a boring and repetitive game bloated to 100 hours with shitty filler.

Attached: ass.creed.odyssey.jpg (1864x1050, 384.49K)

Some are. LA Noire comes to mind.

Attached: LANoireJapanesePort.jpg (3150x2100, 704.19K)

No but the videogame industry is too jewish.