Old FPS

>Old FPS
>Character moves super fast

>Modern FPS
>Character feels slow and heavy

Which is better?

Attached: maxresdefault (19).jpg (1280x720, 142.83K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=VBonvNKrul8&list=PLmYc9gG3yj8TcGenNQ_j-4ICy58ixohLn&index=10
youtube.com/watch?v=DWgHyUtAQOQ
i.imgur.com/7SMj2L8.jpg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

old fps

stupid question faggot, both have their pros and cons and are suited to different types of game

fpbp

Attached: 1.png (837x956, 325.12K)

/thread

Depends on the game.
I kind of prefer slow movement and military-esk games, but I can still enjoy faster paced shooters.

Titanfall 2 mixes both pretty well.

theres no pro in slow and clunky fps gameplay

pretty much this

This

Attached: FC088005-801F-4F24-8631-5248E48EB9D1.jpg (888x1233, 302.28K)

which ever has the most stable netcode so i dont get kill my random chinese people running mach 2

this, I can't get into most modern FPS where you move like a 300 lb slob.

Neither because FPS is shit.

no u

So you think Rainbow Six or Ghost Recon should have had you moving at Quake speed and bhopping?

Really depends on the game but if it's not meant to be realistic, then fast is usually better.

yeah

Yes. I would kill for a tacticool fps where you run and jump high

Counter Strike.

Attached: ogreface.jpg (868x732, 86.9K)

its more like
>PC FPS
>player has movement

>Console FPS
>player has turtle legs

Can't believe I had to scroll down this far for the truth.

youtube.com/watch?v=VBonvNKrul8&list=PLmYc9gG3yj8TcGenNQ_j-4ICy58ixohLn&index=10
HALT

Reminds me of the Airport level

>[alarm sound intensifies]
youtube.com/watch?v=DWgHyUtAQOQ

Attached: based BJ.png (864x570, 714.29K)

How's my collection looking?
i.imgur.com/7SMj2L8.jpg

Speed is a meme in sp shooters its only important in mp

speed is fun
return to castle wolfenstein wouldn't be fun if the protag was slow

Pretty baste.

BLAZKOWICZ, YOU FOOL!! YOU WOULD NOT DESTROY YOUR CRYSTAL TO DESTROY MINE!

WHA- WAIT, WHAT ARE YOU DOING? BLAZKOWICZ! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Attached: hans.jpg (523x576, 55.79K)

They're both fine and people should play the ones that suit their preferences obviously
Ultimately the market will decide which one lives and which one flounders: survival of the fittest is stronger than any random autist's opinion

hot take but here's mine: fps are dumb and shouldn't exist at all
put that in your pipe and smoke it, gaylord

lol no
CSGO used to have good movement but then Valve destroyed bunny-hopping and implemented a tagging system so that if you get hit by one stray bullet you're suddenly slowed by 70% in order to allow the shitters to feel even better about their horrible aim and give them extra time to kill you.

old fps no question, anyone who says the latter has brain damage
going fast is fun, going slow is boring

>every new fps game is clunky
most of the popular ones like cod have really tight movement that's not clunky at all

true. its crazy how valorant is even worse

>.t never played Doom or Quake or any Build engine game

Attached: 1585187673414.jpg (332x493, 30.93K)