I've never played a fallout game before, but I'm thinking of finally trying them out...

I've never played a fallout game before, but I'm thinking of finally trying them out. Which of these two should I begin with?

Attached: Fallout_New_Vegas_vs_Fallout_3-740x416.jpg (740x416, 95.21K)

Play 3 then new Vegas
New Vegas builds off of 3 in a lot of aspects so if you play NV first 3 will feel a little lacking

New Vegas because it's a better rpg with better writing and multiple factions.

3. NV is pseud bait for obsidrones who pretend avellone is a genius,

3 followed by New Vegas.

Who is avellone and why are obsidrones obsessed with making him out to be a genius?

3 isn't that fun after NV but I had fun playing it. Granted it was so long ago now.

neither

Attached: 8C388D55-3353-42CC-B164-68F83DF30F1E.jpg (499x388, 54.4K)

3, then New Vegas to better appreciate NV.

3 so you can then move to NV with some context on the world and be blown away by how much better it is.

Play the first two, then New Vegas
Don't play fallout 3, is for faggots

3 is a lot more lacking in comparison to NV, but it's still a relatively good game, and the transition to NV once you've finished 3 will that much better.
But really you should start here and then play 2, especially since the plot of 3 directly follows on from the results of Fallout 2's ending.

>t.

Attached: Chad8.png (1440x1697, 1.1M)

In order of release. 1, 2, 3, New Vegas. Skip 4 unless you want to play Skyrim with guns.

I played NV, then 3. Enjoyed them both, though NV is the better of the two.

Why is 3 for faggots?

3. I thought NV was boring. Like damn bro real great desert. Not a fuckin thing worth doing in it.

you must be a fucking idiot. Play NV first, it literally does not matter if you don't play 3 because it does not build off of it. NV is a better rpg and a great introduction into the franchise.

What about 76?

If you like RPGs, New Vegas. If you like looter/shooters, 3. They’re both good in their own way, even if 3 is only technically a Fallout game.

New Vegas is the better game but 3 is fun too and going from 3->NV works out a lot better because 3 after NV would be a disappointment.

The only good Fallout games are the first 2. Don't bother with Bethesda shit unless you enjoy sinking into the floor or you really want more Fallout after finishing Fallout 2.

No.

What's 3's setting?

>a great introduction into the franchise.
That it is not. It's literally the high point of the series. Anything after NV is a step down.
It's a great game, but it's not a "great introduction to the franchise" as you won't want to play any of the other ones after it.

do not

Washington, DC

grey/green ruins and buildings

Like damn bro real great rubble. Not a fuckin thing worth doing in it.

Fo3 is probably a better entry point if you know nothing about the setting. NV is a better role playing game as it gives you more player agency.

the gameplay is the exact same in both of them, hot garbage. NV has better writing though. play that if you like cowboys and deserts, otherwise force yourself through 3.

>It's literally the high point of the series.
No, that’s 1 and 2

NV is a solid RPG, 3 is a shooter in an RPGs engine. I've tried to play 3 at least 4 times, and had gotten bored before I was near finished. I've played through New Vegas at least 10 times.

I don't consider them to be the same series.

3 actually has good exploration. NV is a professional mod made 2 years later that tasteless idiots pretend to have taste in something and circlejerk each other over on the internet.

Attached: Fallout 3.png (1850x1088, 438.56K)

If you just want a good experience do New Vegas first. It's the more polished and fleshed out of the two. If you like it maybe try Fallout 3, though be prepared to be a bit underwhelmed (also be ready to run around in sewers. A lot.)

>everyone who likes stuff i don't is just pretending
Key autistic trait

if you dont care about the setting, dont like desert or just want loot shooting then go 3, else NV.

Play both but in short NV plays more like a rpg and fallout 3 plays more like a shooter

I liked both also i hope you have a copy of vista since fallout 3 on anything else can be hit or miss

While this user is right that 3 has a more interesting wasteland to explore (that was Bethesda’s speciality), NV is superior in terms of player choice in many aspects (character sheet, faction options, load outs, perks) that appeals to RPG fans.

3
It doesn't matter that much really

FPBP. Going back to 3's nonsensical ammo, lack of ADS, percentile based speech checks, limited weapons, and dozens of copy-paste subways is agonizing after experiencing New Vegas, and I really like Fallout 3. I like how Megaton works well as a hub from which to embark until you hit Rivet City, I like how the wasteland is utterly hostile yet scales the threat level, I like the occasional really strong questline, but New Vegas is such a stronger experience, even vanilla, that there's no way to try and play 3 after NV with anything but unfavorable comparisons.

That's like telling someone to listen to a band's best album first

Play fallout 1 & 2 retard

Don't listen to the morons in this thread. Get both, download tail of two wasteland mod. It combines both games into a single super game.

Play 1 first.
But if you're gonna be a faggot about it play NV, and don't touch 3. NV is 3 but better in pretty much every aspect.

Attached: fo3.jpg (939x622, 198.23K)

Bought it years ago on steam, played less than an hour since it kept crashing. Wish I could refund it since I barely played it, but nope. I do hear that it's available on GoG and it runs pretty much flawlessly since it has built in patches. Will probably buy it from there.

I like both games but claiming TTW is superior for a first run is the most retarded thing I've ever heard

>especially since the plot of 3 directly follows on from the results of Fallout 2's ending.

How?

Holy fuck, i love you

>I like how Megaton works well as a hub
I really like Megaton. Good for roleplaying. I like returning home to my comfy house, delivering scrap metal to the dude in charge of the water, donating a bit to the church, swinging down to the pub for something to drink, and getting free shit from my adoring fans. Makes Fallout 3 comfy.

Avellone is Black Isle Studios/Obsidian's main writer. I wouldn't say he's a genius but he's def above average.

It doesn't, that guy's just being retarded.

Call me when NV has a loli town
Until then go back to your Total War LARPers and your psuedo cowboys

I like NV infinitely better and don't like 3 at all, but you're a huge retard if you actually say to skip a game entirely, and you're an even bigger retard if you actually heed people who say such a thing
Formulate your opinions, christ

I respect a man who knows what he wants

Cringe pedo

I assume he's talking about how the Enclave flee from the west coast to the east.
Huh?

You should just play them in order. They're all on discount right now.

it's a reboot of what was a dead franchise by lorelets from a different company with no respect for the source material. NV is basically a full conversion mod of 3 made by the team behind the first 2 games.

Yeah but the Enclave in 3 were already there, weren't they? Washington was one of their base of operations, even Eden was built in their base.

Get raped twice and kill yourself, you retarded fucking tranny faggot sack of nigger shit with down syndrome.