Crysis: Remastered

how do you fuck up something this bad. I'm not even a graphics whore but it looks significantly worse. Did they just optimise for console and called it a day? the lighting looks flat af

Looks like they didn't replace strength and speed with power mode like the pieces of shit crysis 2 and 3
Thank fucking god
It looks significantly better
t. over 1k hours in the crysis singleplayer

Attached: hexen crysis brofist.png (982x658, 872.01K)

I replayed it recently and does not look much better, at least now it will use more than 1 Core hopefully so the flight mission should run better

worth a pirate at best

>I'm not even a graphics whore but it looks significantly worse
Congrats, you're a retard that doesn't remember how Crysis looks without mods.

>we want the fortnite audience

It's the same thing but with increased saturation?

Attached: elderly alcoholic.jpg (482x522, 45.36K)

Modtards really do forget how games actually look.

A FUCKING ENB

OH NO NO NO NO

Attached: 8H7CKT1.jpg (1920x1080, 477.39K)

Like real life you mean? Also the original has absolutely garbage CPU support and runs on a single core/two threads at most, so the fact this runs on multicore makes it immediately better by default. The lighting is also a massive improvement since original used forward rendering, this is deferred rendering.
Not that I'd expect tech illiterate RedditLetterMedia retard to understand this though.
Shit sucks that they didn't update the textures though.

Classic.

Attached: index.jpg (1024x656, 110.09K)

yikes

>Like real life you mean?
>posts a photoshopped postcard

Post some side-by-sides

user I sincerely hope you get to travel outside of your grim shithole someday

youtube.com/watch?v=ajwwLEMLaIA
Get fucked nigger.

Attached: fiji island.jpg (1200x814, 203.22K)

Literally all I wanted from this was the multiplayer back and they couldn't even do that.

Attached: 1512967969579.jpg (351x351, 21.54K)

>thinking you have a degree in comp sci because you understand the difference between forward and deffered rendering
Holy brainlet

I forgot a video can't be color-corrected, silly me

Nice filters

I bet you're flatearthers because you ignore all evidence that doesn't align with your worldview.
youtube.com/watch?v=OXX8emUmOGs

Attached: island resort.jpg (1920x851, 310.49K)

is it not on Steam?

>doubles down on retardation
yeah, i heard about that scientific method

>artifical sharpening
>color balance is all wrong
Please stop embarrassing yourself further. This is far from reference material.

You're stupid

It's not revealed officially yet, it's a leak. It doesn't get officially revealed until day after tomorrow, Microsoft just fucked up and put the page up early.
youtube.com/watch?v=byOnAZqzaqw

Don't worry, maybe if you save enough one day you'll be able to move out of your communist grey shithole.

Attached: 74468-1920x1080-[DesktopNexus.com].jpg (1920x1080, 637.43K)

Ebin games

Can't be EGS because it's already on MS Store, MS just fucked up and put the page up early, see

>Deferred rendering better than forward rendering
So I guess stalker is the ultimate power house in terms of graphical fidelity

woah some shitty shooter from 2006 is still shit

no fucking way...PC bros we got too cocky

Attached: 1586228304706.jpg (350x500, 23.15K)

>So I guess stalker is the ultimate power house in terms of graphical fidelity
STALKER looks amazing to this day considering its age and the deferred renderers in it look objectively much better than the static forward ones (you can select static DX9 renderer in options in case you didn't know faggot).

>IT LOOKS OK
console niggeers need to get their eyes checked
>that asset quality
>that pathetic draw distance and gay fog
>that empty scenery
What is this? 2013? What the fuck crytek?

I fail to see the issue? it's been a while but I can't see anything that seems inferior to the original

All the footage was captured on pc

FUCK OFF OP, THAT'S THE FUCKING SWITCH VERSION.....THE GAME WILL LOOK MUCH BETTER ON PC AND XBOX ONE X.

It's a remaster (not a remake) of a 2007 game, what did you expect? It's just the unmodded original 2007 Crysis, but running on latest CryEngine so it has better lighting and proper multicore support. That's pretty much it.

Bruh the only thing deferred lighting buys you is that a scene can have an unlimited number of light sources (even then they lose the advantage if they cast dynamic shadows). Plus there is a buttload of numerical issues with frame buffers since you are rendering to a texture

Good old Crysis 2 leak times

Multiple light sources give you the advantage of a much better lit scene with more realistic lighting, did you even take a single look at original Crysis (or STALKER running on the static option) and how fucking flat the lighting is in comparison? Are genuinely retarded or just pretending?

>put reshade color filter on crysis
>call it a remaster

Attached: 151005939793.gif (200x200, 2.65M)

did Crysis even have fog / distant lod?

>Ignores statement about dynamic shadows.
>Ignores statement about precision.
I mean you can pretend these games have the most amazing graphics ever but we both know they are overrated and alias hard.

Now it reminds me of Ark (2014) lol

Attached: ARK-Survival-Evolved-Beach.jpg (1085x610, 117.31K)

Yes, you can even tweak it.
e_lod_max = 3
e_lod_ratio = 9
e_view_dist_ratio = 128
e_view_dist_ratio_detail = 64
e_view_dist_ratio_vegetation = 64
These are basically double of the vanilla max settings.
You can also use e_lods = 0 to completely disable LODs.

So this is the power.. of putting the remaster on the Switch

honestly, as long as nothing's dumbed down from the original and it runs well, i'll be happy to pirate it
in can run Warhead fine but for some reason vanilla Crysis stutters like crazy

Barely remastered, still look better than 98% of lastgen's games.