Spyro 2 > 1 > 3

2 has too many gimicks. I actually prefered 3

This but in reverse.

>2 too many gimmicks
>not 3

>2 has too many gimicks. I actually prefered 3
REREAD YOUR FUCKING POST

Attached: 1293712983712.png (656x509, 357.77K)

this

1 > 2 > 3

I beat 1 and 2 last week, looking forward to starting 3 tonight

1 is my favorite so far though, just pure platforming, my favorite levels and the music is the most kino so far

Spyro 2 has far more annoying levels than 3

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 109.88K)

I can get behind this. 3 went way overboard with the minigames, to the point where I lost interest.

Headbutting the turtles out of the way is easy as shit

I can't imagine why anyone would like 1 the most

>Enemies and platforming with the risk of death in the hub worlds
Not comfy

1 has a very different fantasy feel to everything and its strictly about the dragons.

>no dumb gimmicks
>no power ups that you have to buy that arbitrarily block you from being able to 100% a level

That's only true for the first hubs levels, the second hub and everything is a desert shithole

2 is the weakest out of them for me personally
the list of stages i never want to ever play again is largest in 2 out of all the others
>fracture hills
>aquaria towers
>magma cone hunter part
>skelos badlands
>breeze harbor
>metro speedway

>complaining about buying things
holy casual

Did re-ignited cut a bunch of levels? I beat all 3 games and I swear as a child there used to be this part of a map in Spyro 2 where you had to run around a race track in a circle until you headbutted the ass of a giant tiki dude

Attached: 1585578720652.jpg (368x285, 16.55K)

and all the good levels of spyro 1
>tree tops
>1

I think it's weird people don't want to sleep with the dragons.

Attached: 1593026633062.jpg (1280x720, 71.13K)

Best level design that makes use of your character's unique abilities, there that's enough.

3 2 1

>Best level design
>Let's make everything a hop and glide segment without any indication if the player has hit the height of their jump

spyro 1 feels like a spyro 2 level pack. it's fun but not even close to a complete game

Attached: 1590375579965.webm (1314x720, 2.83M)

Correct ranking, but 2 was fine.

He didn't say hard.

Enter the Dragonfly > any other spyro title

>muh pure platforming
I never understood this, why is it seen as such a stigma for a game to try and shake up the core gameplay ubiquitous gimmicks? It's like if a game isn't just the same basic gameplay for 100% of the game it's seen as a detriment. As long as it's still built around the core mechanics, why not have unique missions with special modifiers that actually apply those core mechanics in unique ways rather than have the whole game be the same generic platforming over the same basic assets for the whole game?

Spyro 1 felt like an incredibly long tech demo before playing 2 and 3 which were actual games

That's basically Insomniac Games in a nutshell for a series. First game's the test bed of what works and what doesn't work, then they refine in the sequels. You can see this with Ratchet & Clank too, and people hope it happens to Spider-Man.

Spyro 1s level design is too basic, the gimmicks and side missions in the sequels do a better job of applying the basic mechanics in more unique and challenging ways

Oh I'm sorry it doesn't have a guy at the start of every level going "hey spyro, [insert enemy here] is doing [insert bad action here], can you please help us?" And at the end going "Wow thanks spyro you did it you made it to the end!", or are you talking about have 3-4 mostly unfun minigame gimmicks? I do love all those amazing minigames like... uuuuuhhh.... skateboarding?