Graphics don't make a game, GAMEPLAY does

>graphics don't make a game, GAMEPLAY does

Why do Nincels love saying this shit? As if good gameplay and graphics are not only mutually exclusive, but are exclusive to their respective gaming platforms.

Attached: 2f1.jpg (600x748, 32.15K)

because it's true, retard

>As if good gameplay and graphics are not only mutually exclusive
They're not.
>but are exclusive to their respective gaming platforms.
But this is the objective state of things.
The only exceptions like Bloodborne because that's what we're talking about have good gameplay but dogshit graphics.

It's a fallacy, of course. It's possible to like a game for its characters, cutscenes, music, porn, artsyle and more.
It's just that pozzed Snoy shit and similar walking simulators also lack the other reasons I listed to like the game.

Because its true?
A movie doesn't need top of the line CGI to be good and neither does a game.

Attached: yawningmonk.jpg (1920x1280, 457.54K)

gtfo summerbitch

go into a paper mario thread and they'll flip that shit around jack fucking flash i guarantee you.
not a word to speak of nu-PM's awful gameplay BUT DA PAPER TEXTURE IS SO REALISTIC LOOK AT THAT FUCKIJNG PAPER WHO CARES IF THE REST OF THE GAME IS LITERAL SHIT PAPER PAPER PAPER HOLY FUCKING SHIT

Except it's a VIDEO game, presentation matters just as much and can many times directly influence gameplay. It's a false dichotomy setup by dumbo Ninten-drones to explain why their latest pokefag trash looks bad (yet have no excuse for why it plays like shit too).

>The only exceptions like Bloodborne because that's what we're talking about have good gameplay but dogshit graphics.

You're fine to have your opinion, but to really discount an entire library of games as graphics whoring is a bit jumping the gun, don't you think?

Stop criticizing nintendo.

>only cares about muh graphics and not an appealing artstyle

>I don't care if the gameplay is shitty and boring as long as it has expensive pretty 3d moving pictures

typical sonybros

Attached: 3333456789.png (850x850, 62.66K)

The idea is that they would rather take a game with trash graphics with good gameplay than a trash gameplay with good graphics.

Of fucking course they can have both.
Luigi's Mansion 3 already proved that and the controversy with Sword and Shield

What fucking quote are you taking from? 2007?

Now that I think about, they've been doing a lot of these stupid gimmicky graphics designs that look like fucking ass when a normal-looking game would probably fare so much better. The games don't even look good, Yoshi Woolly World, Kirby Epic Yarn, making Link's Awakening look like stupid figurine trash and completely destroying the atmosphere of the original. It's like they had ONE hit with Yoshis Island 25 years ago and suddenly think they have the same spark they did (they don't).

See above, their "artstyles" are just shoehorned dogshit.

What does a "normal looking" game look like to you?

>The idea is that they would rather take a game with trash graphics with good gameplay than a trash gameplay with good graphics.

That's not even something that needs to be said to anyone with a shred of a brain, it's just something drones repeat to themselves because their games look like garbage.

As has been stated multiple times before, you can do both. God of War 2018 feels like such a natural evolution over the arcade-y gameplay of previous GoW games. I don't want to go full Druckmann and claim the series "grew up" but it's night and day and going back and playing the earlier games doesn't have the same feeling.

Not having a fucking yarn aesthetic maybe? They purposely style their games to a sickening degree to make up for any ability to give people modern-looking games. And when they finally do, like BOTW or Mario Odyssey, you see why they don't, both of these games look really bad, which does in fact hamper my overall enjoyment.

it's called hierarchical thinking, snoy, something your tranny loving egalitarian radlib self can't possibly understand

i.e gameplay is more fundamental to a game's quality than graphics, which doesn't mean graphics don't matter at all

ok, but here's the thing, everyone knows that already. Who the fuck has ever said "yeah, the game is shit and causes me misery, but I'm going to keep playing because it looks really good." And honestly if they do say that, maybe the game's graphics and scenery are good enough to hold it over, who's to say that person's thinking is necessarily wrong?

Face it, they say this shit because they get garbage ports like this, but get giddy they can play the game while taking their 30th shit that day from being morbidly obese tendies.

Attached: The_Outer_Worlds_Switch4.jpg (1280x720, 229.58K)

God of War 2018's gameplay isn't as fun as the other games imo

This is the same board that sucks off the original Deus Ex and that game isn't Nintendo exclusive and it still follows that rhetoric

>ok, but here's the thing, everyone knows that already
obviously not since you've still got mechanically average at best titles like TloU2 being hailed as industry defining masterpieces

Nincels think they're geniuses for pointing out the concept of graphics over gameplay and have no idea some of the most revered games of all time look like goddamn ass.

Attached: CJ-GTASA.png (360x450, 143.2K)

Probably because most snoy games are cinematic experiences

I'm not talking about paid-off game urinalists, I'm talking about your average Nintendumbo on GameFAQs or other forums.

well you apparently don't know that either because you're using fucking god of war 2018 as an example of quality gameplay which is hilarious

the funny thing is that the majority of nintendo games are 60fps and still manage to have a good artstyle that carries the simpler graphics

because you get crap like guilty gear strive, a series that had good gameplay is now babyfied and boring.

I'm not looking to debate your needlessly inflammatory contrarianism in this thread, believe it or not. In fact every annoying insecure obese virgin that tries to shit on a well-renowned game needs to provide their own version of what's considered "good" so that we can all point and laugh right back at you, stupid fucking turd.

It's possible to do 60fps on consoles if you're not retarded, look at id games or MGSV.

Who cares when the best game ever made GTAO has both

Attached: 2020-06-03 (6).jpg (3840x2160, 591.64K)

Is that... Peach being kidnapped by Bowser again?
MAMA MIA I-I'M... I'M GONNA *BING *BING *WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Attached: Bing Bing WAHOOOOOOOOOOMING.png (492x616, 247.69K)

Old games had shitty graphics and they're still fun to play.

graphics takes time and money away from other aspects of the game. Music, gameplay, story/dialog, style, and setting all suffer as they pour everything into graphics to use in commercials.
good graphics are usually just super realistic ones anyway, and those types of uninspired and don't really catch the eye and aren't memorable.