Legitimately one of the worst SNES games ever made

In its heyday it was marketed directly to flyover Christian families as a nonviolent alternative to Doom or Duke Nukem, while mechanically it's still a Wolfenstein 3D reskin (a game which certainly stood on its own merits in its time) so I gotta imagine anyone who played it as a child developed a Stockholm Syndrome form of nostalgia for it as "The FPS I'm Allowed To Play At Home"

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (957x720, 165.5K)

Because the only reason it was put up and bought was for memes anyways

They're all "so funny 10/10" reviews you fucking dip
Except stuff like this one I guess

Attached: noah.jpg (424x437, 95.88K)

cope

This game isnt just soul
Its the holy spirit

did they rebuild the engine or something to get around copyright?

Attached: 1585683347815.gif (200x200, 851.1K)

Is it actually a bad game or is it bad because avgn said so?

>Feed
UUUHHHHHHH BROS????

Actually no, they licensed the Wolfenstein engine from ID Software.

they were using the engine without a license from Id at the time (which isnt very christian of them) but once Id found out what game they were trying to make they thought it was hilarious and sold them a license at a discount.

Attached: formerly.png (640x622, 845.44K)

But it's not that bad.
It's just a meme version of Doom.

Based
SneedCHADS run this board

>It runs well on modern hardware
>More wolf3d style content if you beat the OG and Spear of Destiny
>Getting health is a game itself
>The game is fairly difficult at times
>Layouts are as vast as Wolf3d
>You play a biblical chad

Because to rate a game on steam you have to buy it. So the only people rating it are die hard fans and weirdos who will give it a positive score no matter what.

Well, this is disappointing. I was hoping to see it be TLOU2.

Attached: Untitled.png (682x476, 44.96K)

It's high rated because of the AVGN episode you zoomer

dead meme

AAASSSSSS

>Feed

Attached: 2300C29D-12A3-48FA-9E26-C4C59BC135AF.gif (276x276, 1.75M)

dead sneed

The game is a meme. It's so bad that it's good. It's $4.99 full-price and was discounted to $1.74 as of the most recent sale; moreover, it was in numerous Fanatical bundles.

It's rating isn't 93% because people think it's better than Skyrim (for which 92% of all reviews are positive). It's because most people who bought Super 3-D Noah's Ark bought it as a cheap novelty and were amused by it. What you apparently don't understand about Steam reviews is that people don't assign ratings to games; they either recommend it or they don't. It's "yes" or "no" rather than 0 to 10. If the game's rating were 100%, it wouldn't mean everyone thinks it's a 10/10 experience. It could just mean that everyone thought it was barely good enough to recommend.

Reviews on Steam are often indicative of quality, because a bad game is more likely to have people leaving negative reviews, but it's still important to distinguish percentage of positive reviews from some kind of actual score. Super 3-D Noah's Ark having a 93% is probably less an indication of the game's actual quality being 93/100, and more an indication that most of the people who purchased the game were completely aware of what it is: a notorious meme game for religious kids whose parents disapproved of Wolfenstein. They knew this, decided they wanted to try it anyway, said "haha old game" and were satisfied.

Also, Steam's review system is fucked because reviews can be rated as "funny" which gives people an incentive to leave funny reviews which are not always accurate.

Wtf is this real?

ok, fine

Attached: most_wanted.jpg (1525x2135, 1.89M)

>le funny video game man said it was bad so it must be bad

thanks for beta testing it for us Tendies

Attached: 717.jpg (600x539, 35.37K)