Does criticism help a game improve?
Does criticism help a game improve?
Other urls found in this thread:
I don't agree with that.
Removing a negative aspect of something improves the ratio of overall positive features. If I had a quarter-pounder burger covered in rancid, liquid human shit it's still technically a burger and it's edible but it would be a lot better without the caca. If I had the choice between that burger and a burger without doodoo, I'll choose the shitless burger. Easy to understand?
>several people are typing...
top kek
I don't agree with that.
When it's yandere sim no because all the criticism he gets is just buzzwords and people straight up shitting on him
Constructive criticism that points out flaws and give suggestions for how to improve them can improve a game, if they are actually good ideas.
In theory, yes. Constructive criticism matters but what also matters is the person behind it. If some absolute moron who can't win a street fighter match because they walk into hadoukens and then jump into your anti-air criticises street fighter and wants hadoukens remove, they can even frame this as constructive criticism and it is still 100% worthless and the game will not improve because of this person's input. In fact listening to such a person would be detrimental to the game's quality.
Consider also that such people are numerous and vocal. Often this criticism and their suggestions of how to "fix" a game conflict with the other idiots as well.
I'm not defending yandev, but listening to the lowest common denominator is not the path to success.
You son of a bitch. What sort of analogy can I give to you to make you understand? If you're eating cheese puffs and someone spits on them wouldn't it be better if there was no spit? Wouldn't removing the spit make it better? I'm struggling here. How about if you're making your breakfast and someone replaced your butter with salt-free butter? Wait, hold on. You're at a BBQ and someone puts vegetables on your plate. Wouldn't it be better without the vegetables?
No. The point of criticism is to stop people from making shit they love. If you don't have anything nice to say don't say it at all.
Let's hear a non food analogy.
Huh?
>Removing a negative aspect
What dictates something as negative
>You son of a bitch. What sort of analogy can I give to you to make you understand? If you're eating cheese puffs and someone spits on them wouldn't it be better if there was no spit? Wouldn't removing the spit make it better? I'm struggling here. How about if you're making your breakfast and someone replaced your butter with salt-free butter? Wait, hold on. You're at a BBQ and someone puts vegetables on your plate. Wouldn't it be better without the vegetables?
t. 4th grader.
When you surround yourself with yes men you get the star wars prequels.
Only when it's coming from someone who knows what they're talking about, which excludes everyone in public Discord servers and all journalists.
Subjective taste, but when your endeavor is a creative designed to appeal to a lot of people then it is the collective subjective perception of all those people that determines if something is negative. If an overwhelming majority of the people you're trying to sell something to don't like something, and your intention is to be successful, then that thing should be considered negative and it would be beneficial for your success to remove it.
The prequels were good. Episode 3 is the only good SW movie the rest is shitty boomer nostalgia with aged effects.
You are a stupid black nigger retard.
Go back to your grave Terry
Criticism doesn't improve a game. They're useless post-development unless there are major mechanical or online issues. Criticism is better for TV shows/movies than games
It can improve a sequel.
Naw, since most people are dumb anyway. Only thing which improves games are competent devs.
>You son of a bitch. What sort of analogy can I give to you to make you understand? If you're eating cheese puffs and someone spits on them wouldn't it be better if there was no spit? Wouldn't removing the spit make it better? I'm struggling here. How about if you're making your breakfast and someone replaced your butter with salt-free butter? Wait, hold on. You're at a BBQ and someone puts vegetables on your plate. Wouldn't it be better without the vegetables?
So far as it is constructive and not petty.
Zig Forums is capable of it. But not aware of the difference.
criticism is what made square enix literally blow up FFXIV and start all over, now it's one of the most played MMOs in the west.
I don't agree with that
His right, most video game criticism like on this board is an absolute joke, you people have no valid criticism, you just judge things based on how hard they pander to you personal, and take points away if they pander to some other demographic. even more points of if it's a demographic you hate.
Only the sorriest most pathetic living human beings would be in a yandare dev discord, or feel the need to obsessively troll the yandaredev guy, there's no doubt in my mind that none of them have a single valid criticism to make that the guy hasn't already been aware of.
Let's agree to disagree.
>food analogy
>poo analogy
Jesus christ not even one generation of H1Bs and poo in loos are already getting americanized
why would you ever speak to someone with mental illness?
Imagine wanting to operate in an echo chamber
I may be autistic enough to browse on 4channel dot org but atleast I have the self-awareness not to do some shit like that.
You can't update a movie half way through watching it.
Yea, no shit. Even in something baby tier like Mario Maker watching someone bitch about your level helps make it better.
Considering most games are live service now, yes, yes you can.
>can't take criticism
>can't code
YandereDev would fit in perfectly at Game Freak!
rarely
if you don't tell someone that their work is shit, you get david cage or the prequels