Is it really THAT good? Why the 83 then?

A weeb reviewer complained that the game was an inauthentic caricature of Japan and gave it 60/100.
Other reviewers thought they were big brained for pointing out how it does things other open world games have done, completely missing the point that it simply does those open world conventions flat out better.

It's the hot springs scenes that didit

Then why it got a perfect score in a Japanese magazine that only has given 40/40 to 23 games since it's conception?

>famitsu
LOL. they are even worse than IGN and Gamepro. These people think Nintendogs is literally a masterpiece

Critics were butthurt because last of trannys 2 was being shit on by users.

>The 83 score is by professional reviewers, not women
Man, you are really out of touch. Western game reviewers are 20 percent women and 80 percent soibois, who are honorary women.

To save others the Google trip, the other two were Skyrim and GTAV.

Because the japanese industry isn't nearly as corrupt.

thanks

Famitsu has been a corrupt, incompetent cesspool for 20 years now.

Attached: 1441522145856.jpg (940x529, 67.48K)

Death Stranding aka delivery shit simulator > Ghost of Tsushima aka yet another generic action game.

I'd rather eat fresh shit, than eat the same shit I've eaten hundreds of times before. Either way, both games still suck and this entire industry is super aids.

Fuck all of you.

>Why the 83 then?
Because it's not "advancing the medium" like the typical moviegame that gets 10/10s.

That retarded big titty chick people were spamming a month ago was right, Snoy isn't buying reviews, it's just that reviewers are normie pseud retards.

rude

It's not that good. It's a case of nippons being susceptible to flattery.

No one brought up DS but you. You could just not play either if you don't like them.

Nintendo bonus and it's not filled with social justice crap.

Love you man

>83
Because critics are fucking dogshit. You have to be underage to not have realized this by now.

Attached: c1638cc0-cc9d-11ea-9b3b-024578d80d6a.jpg (1920x1080, 192.73K)

>Country that gets game that tells people "We're the good guys, they're the definitive bad guys, love us more" gets perfect score
>Western country gives it a lower score out of honesty
I wonder OP

nigga I'm on this tiny ass fucking island and one part of it is entirely covered in snow while the other parts are like spring forests and shit, this shit is retarded

>death stranding
>40/40
>the last of us 2
>39/40
>ghost of tsushima
>40/40

they apparently changed its stance on scoring

How can we realistically solve the Twitter problem? It shouldn't be allowed that literally two vocal trannies say GAME BAD and critics try to please them for subversive society points

If there's one thing that western critics are, it's incredibly honest.

You mean to tell me twitter is irrelevant?

You're describing Chile's climate

Chile is not an island, nor is it tiny.

Oh absolutely. I've never known a paid critic to lie. That's why they're professionals. Duh!

Attached: Angry.jpg (467x601, 70.85K)

Based Famitsu they know quality.

yes, except for the fact that you have to go hundreds of miles for those changes and miles in altitude. the cold part of the island is actually lower altitude than the other parts lol

so many games do this shit because they have to shoehorn every single climate into an open world game, like every single open world game needs a desert, and a jungle, and a snowy mountain, and a swamp, etc.
I mean I don't really care, it just triggers my autism to see it. Horizon zero dawn was even worse though, literally a desert right next to a hot humid jungle and you just walk right into the jungle from the desert with no transition.

>Doesn't make sense in burgerland so it never happens anywhere in the world

no, it makes no sense because the geography of a tiny island like tsushima is almost entirely uniform.

>Turbo-autists who swear by metacritic and think anything short of a 100 is bad

Attached: 5346754788549.gif (500x300, 492.33K)

Not either of those anons but I mean, it's a video game where you as one man kill hundreds of well equipped warrior invaders without taking a single hit in a very historically inaccurate story and the climate is what bothers you?

i unironically believe the best way to tell if a game is genuinely good is if it's in the 70-79 range on metacritic

Attached: 1593825767115.jpg (1314x1096, 191.85K)

It's a solid 8. Would be a 9 if there was a lock on and you could skip cutscenes

that's just as dumb

For those who still wonder why.

Attached: e6zeriqzjqb51.jpg (981x7567, 738.43K)

who is big milky chick? i wanna see big milky

How much score did Famitsu give TLoU2 again?

>lock on
Not really needed when the near the end of act one if you've you know, played the game and didn't rush through it that it boils down to Switch to most effective stance, Triangle mash till guard break, then insta kill, or wait for attack perfect parry insta kill...Even easier if you have the deflect arrows upgrade.