Is targeting a native 4k resolution just a waste of resources?
Is targeting a native 4k resolution just a waste of resources?
Brandon Lee
Lucas Morris
maybe if you poor
Jordan Campbell
Framerate > resolution
Henry Martinez
it will be easy in a couple years
Parker Gomez
If you're not hitting 60FPS you shouldn't be worrying about resolution at all.
If you're hitting 60fps you should be worrying about getting it above that instead.
Jason Perez
4k is a meme they should have pushed 1440p before 4k
Levi Peterson
yes, for video games especially, games just get more and more expensive to make because of this meme
just stick to 1080 and focus on art direction instead
Elijah Powell
4k is a meme for games
Andrew Sanchez
how is raising the resolution making games more expensive you absolute nigger
Nathaniel Miller
You can pretty much equate fps to resolution on a rough relative scale, while knowing the respective bottle-necks (fps:cpu & res:gpu). The scale is going 1080p to 4k (which is 2160p) is the same workload increase as doubling your FPS. The only caveat again, is making sure your CPU/GPU wont' bottleneck at your actual desired FPS/resolution.
However 4k is barely even starting so it's not worth it right now in that sense. Same for 144fps. However I think more games are supporting 120/144fps than 4k. But on the other hand, I think 4k is alot more mass-produced so the tvs/monitors are cheaper than 120+ fps monitors (don't think high fps tvs even exist). But your screen has to be in front of your face and at least 32inches. If it's farther away it has be fuck huger (TVs of which are probably mass produced too so that's fine).