It's over mechabros

It's over mechabros

Attached: 4564788845.jpg (328x426, 70.79K)

it's early access

>tactical turn based
already a limited market
>early access
>released literally today
>37 reviews
OP is a retard

>using early access as a defense

>QUALGEVA

>early access
who cares

played the demo, the game is really fucking slow and the mechs have pretty loose controls. The UI is hard on the eyes too.
That being said, I like the battle system, Valkyria Chronicles + robutts is exactly what I wanted.

is the game any different for the demo form a thousand years ago?

>those tags
>also EA
not sure what you were expecting

>buying early access games thinking they are complete
You're retarded.

I hope it will turn out like Project Nimbus. That game was really janky at first but they kept adding more missions and upping the graphics until it looked like a respectable indie game.

isnt it just valkyria chronicles without the cute girls?

>assuming I'd purchase early access trash
brainlet

how much of the game is even finished

all the reviews just talk about how the tutorial/first mission are busted but no further. CAN you even go further or is this just a janky proof of concept?

If it plays like Valkyria Chronicles I'm sold

>But you can cheese it by doing _____ and _____
I don't give a shit. I didn't give a shit about the whole orders buffed scout on VC, I won't give a shit here.

that description really does not inspire confidence

but user, it doesn't play like VC

it plays like shit

Dont a lot of people also say VC plays like shit?

No.

Yes; VC is easily one of the most reviled turn based games.
I still don't give a shit.

Fair.

i've heard people complain about the scout cheesing but never the core gameplay. people like VC. I think the bigger complaint is the bullshit they have done with the setting and cast of all the various entries

I thought people liked the WWI/WWII-ish setting the game had

>i've heard people complain about the scout cheesing but never the core gameplay. people like VC. I think the bigger complaint is the bullshit they have done with the setting and cast of all the various entries

You heard wrong. People absolutely despises VC's core gameplay, the scout cheesing being used as "irrefutable proof" of the core gameplay being bad.
About the characters and setting, the bitching boils down to "it's not VC1 so it's shit"; basically people only liked the first game and hated the rest.

VC has shit balance but it's literally one of the best implementations of infantry combat in a strategy game since Jagged Alliance. It just needed effort and polish to make it shine, which it never got

fuck i just want a new front mission so bad and not the monkey paw garbage we got with evolved and left alive

I thought people didn't like VC4 because it just continued off of VC1's gameplay and didn't take any of the gameplay improvements of the other VCs that made scout cheesing less powerful. That and VC4 somehow had downgraded graphics compared to VC1.

Hopefully the devs can turn it around with the criticism, they seem to already be working on fixes to some stuff already judging by twitter. I really hope this can be turned around into at least something some people enjoy.

has anyone in here even played it though

Why do you have such strong opinions about games you never played?
I can talk for 1, 2 and 4 which I played to completion (never played 3)
4 visually looks exactly the same as 1 and plays very similarly too; in fact 4 felt like the actual 2 rather than a fourth game that should be radically different.
2 had some gameplay improvements (mainly a lot of subclasses with very different strengths and weaknesses), but those were wasted due to that game's tiny maps (it was a PSP game after all).

I remember there were some people posting comparisons between VC1's and VC4's shaders and VC4's had less detail or something.

Holy shit its actually out?

But how mixed is it? Is it "muh bugs and gliches" mixed, or is it "this is trash because the gameplay is shit" mixed?