Could it have worked if the WiiU had been named 'Wii Deluxe'?

Could it have worked if the WiiU had been named 'Wii Deluxe'?

Also explain this.

Attached: Drake WiiU Switch.jpg (1522x1200, 706.52K)

13 million people bought a wii-u.
The switch has a install base of 60 million.
Most people never played those wii-u games, so of course switch players would be interested.
Why is this so hard to understand?

imagine paying for the same games again at a new price because some irrelevant dlc was added
how are nintendofans so fuckingcucked?

I think the Wii U was the victim of a generation gap. There was yet that massive install base of gen-z children interested in Nintendo, and all the manchildren who are willing to buy Nintendo products in their thirties didn't have enough disposable income yet.

Nintendo consoles for children, drooling retards and pedophiles but back in the Wii U days Obama hadn't fixed the economy yet.

Holy shit you fucking faggot.
Is so hard to get?
Most people DON'T own a WiiU and those games.
The Switch owners that buy them are buying them as if they were new games.
You absolute fucking retard.

>slap on deluxe
>suddenly the nincel wants to buy it for $60
how does miyamoto do it?

>The Switch owners that buy them are buying them as if they were new games.
Ah yes, the "DELUXE HD REMASTER EDITION" of a 5-8 year old game that was 20 is now 60 again
big lole

>buying old games as new games
>other people are retarded, not me!
What did user mean by this?

Attached: miylx35g9xb51.png (386x372, 263.85K)

Deluxe means better, so it must be better.

Nobody bought those games on the wiiu tho?

kinda feels like i missed out skipping the WiiU. all these games that have been ported have been great and i could had that enjoyment way earlier. Other than XCX, any other wiiu exclusives i missed out on?

Ninten-drones are starved for games so they'll gladly buy the same games over and over

>People who never owned a game or the platform that it came out on treat old games as something new
>too dumb to understand this

It should have been called “Wii & U & Zaboomafu”

Alright. Do you think it's ok to charge full price for a Switch game that was released years earlier on the WiiU? Or do you think Switch re-releases should be cheaper?

Zimbabwe

>Could it have worked if the WiiU had been named 'Wii Deluxe'?
No, that's even more retarded name than Wii U

It really is that simple.

And this happens often. You will see when Nier remake comes out. A few yers ago nobody cared, but the success of Automata got people interested in the series. Now when it comes out it will be like
>OMGH THE BEST GAME EVER; YOKO TARO GENIUS SIMPLY THE BEST
>''A cult classic became even better now'' articles written by reviewers who gave it 6/10
etc.

I can't tell if I like Wii U or Switch box art better. Switch is bright and colorful but kind of busy. Wii U has a consistent blue theme to it.

Well, there is Super Mario 3D World, although I'm not a fan

Cemu vs Switch for Donkey Kong?
Cemu is free while Switch is $60

It varies from product to product.
Tropical Freeze is one of my favorite games of all time but it being full price on Switch was bullshit.
Based off what I'm hearing, Pikmin 3 might be worth it but I can't say for sure until after it's out.
Mario Kart 8 DX is bullshit at full price for anybody who already purchased the DLC. That's probably everyone who owned it on WiiU though. It's funny how this used to be some of the most generously priced DLC ever and a couple years later it doesn't feel like a complete package at $60.
Captain Toad is a budget game but it might be the worst offender. It's the exact opposite of MK8. There wasn't any prior DLC to add in so they made new DLC and charged for it. Maybe that's moreso the opposite of the Pikmin 3 port? Imagine if the new Olimar content they're making wasn't included but instead was paid DLC exclusive to the Switch version. Unforgivable.
Breath of the Wild is mostly fine. The precedent was set with Twilight Princess, and multigenerational games are an industry standard. The real crime here is that WiiU's big Zelda game had all the gamepad functionality of the HD remakes gutted out so that it wouldn't be the definitive experience.
Pokken is a dumpsterfire on both systems.
NSMB has dlc included at least. Probably shouldn't be full price.
Bayo 2 didn't need to be full price. If you buy either 1 or 2 you do get a permanent discount on the other title so that's worth noting.
Never played 101. I'm pretty sure that got ported to more than Switch though. I'm not sure if it belongs in this group.
The real problem is with how spread out all of this is. NSMB could have been a launch title. They are intentionally staggering releases to avoid competition with newer titles and to artificially fill gaps in the schedule.

W101 is on PC, k+m controls are horseshit even by k+m standards

WiiU and you can play all Wii, GC, GBA, N64 and WiiU games

I have a WiiU but if I am going to spend $60 it will be on the 'definitive' version

>the only games worth a shit are Captain Toad, NSMBU, and maybe Zelda
god the WIi U was such a pile of shit

No

I don't understand why everyone's shitting on P3D. It seems like one of the first Nintendo rereleases in a long time that actually has enough content to justify existing.
For the record, I say this as someone who bought a Wii U and hasn't bought any of the rereleases for games I already had except for Pokken because of the characters that were Arcade-only

Attached: bad177a18e37cbbd894f732dabdcfa9b.jpg (850x630, 132.75K)

XCX is the worst game in that series and sucks
the only actually great Wii U exclusive that hasn't been ported yet is Kirby Rainbow Curse

also god forbid they try to somehow resurrect Starfox Zero, the worst game on the Switch

So when's Xenoblade X?

>almost every single Switch version is a Deluxe version with new content
>b-b-b-b-but user they're releasing the same games!!!!

What did Nintendophobes mean by this?

Attached: download (2).jpg (196x197, 6.84K)

Bayo2 comes with Bayo1, doesn't it? Well, the physical version did, anyway.

Fatal Frame