guess which souls game is which.
Guess which souls game is which
Bloodborne demons ds3 ds1 ds2?
>3 was butchered in the process
>2 was butchered in the process
>BB was cut
>and so was DS
>it all started with DeS having 6 levels at some point
You can take 140p screens of all DS game and increase the gamma 300% and make them look like shit yes.
>that texture
>excused by gamma or resolution
they are nothing but reskins
cool numbers
>WHICH SOLS GEM IS DA BEST FAGOYS
Different Companies and Different Genre.
vs
Same Company and same Genre.
Retrd
>it's okay when From does it
>I actually am okay with repetition when it's repetition I enjoy
Yeah well I still like them so
DS3 AND DS2 FUCKING SUCK ONE IS GREY AND THE OTHER PLAYS LIKE SHIT
Cope more games are not movies
>Ignores everything I said.
Is like saying all Platformers, Metroidvanias, and JRPG are just reskins of each others.
>not over shoulder
You missed the point
Here's how it looks without contrast/gamma set to max.
Yeah, DS2 not fantastic in the graphics department, especially some vanilla areas but if you have to edit images (or purposefully look for shit ones) to you've already lost the argument.
people are such faggots coping to defend dark souls 2 its the worse one you are not smart after watching a fucking hbombergoy video
Here's how bad any youtube screenshot can look with the saturation/gamma set to shit like in the OP image.
I HATE DARK SOULS 2 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND DARK SOULS £
Demon's souls is the worst one, good thing From learned a lot from the prototype and made DS1, DS2, BB and DS3 much better games in every respect, especially bosses.
Yeup, welcome to vidya. With Sekiro they just learned to not leave as much cut content in, much better clean up.
With that said, it’s all how you “cut” it. DeS is “missing” a world but you wouldn’t think so if you played it: It’s all consistent and thorough and complete - and it was a game Miyazaki got called in to fix, except it doesn’t suck the millions of dicks that is DS2. There’s no “Lost Izalith”-tier level here.
DS3 is a whole different ideal, but far moreso than Bloodborne I was getting answers through the cut content and changes.
uhm...bros?
>With Sekiro they just learned to not leave as much cut content in, much better clean up.
You mean how great tools and skills are useful for 99% of the time :)
It still looks like complete shit. Its not just "not fantastic", it literally looks like an early PS2 game
>Demon's souls is the worst one
Beats the shit out of DS2, on par with DS1, and DS3 isn’t too interesting outside of its bossfights (moreso if you have Bloodborne as a reference).
dont >:) at me cunt 5 of the prothetics are usful
>those repeating textures
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
SH2 and 3 look way better than this overall.
TRANNIES BTFO
reminder that DS2 still has almost x2 the online activity of DS1+DSR
IT SHIT AND FOR FAGFGOTS
By this logic your favorite series is shit because it's expected to be in the same genre with each sequel.
Yes that is why people enjoy video games
sick of cunts defending dark souls 2 because of fucking hbomberguy
Yea Earthen Peak and Shaded woods look real bad compared to Forest of Giants, Shrine of Almana, Heide's tower, Dragon Peak, Aldia's home, but they're like 5% of the game, like Shaded Woods isn't even an area more like a connecting tunnel between 2 actual areas.
Didn't someone render all the Dark Souls maps out next to each other and DS1, DS3 and Demon Souls all have sensible areas that line up perfectly while DS2 is a clusterfuck that has you wandering into where other areas should be; totally ignoring any sort of actual world building
makes sense that DS2 morons would take a leftist retard's words at face value
DS2 is a better game than DS1, hence why DS3 uses more core mechanics from DS2 than DS1.
DS1 is a better work of art than DS2.
DeS had such an amazing aesthetics. This game was so wildly different from and better than DaS. Shame Sony never rereleased the original
has it occurred to you that people are then justified in liking the 'PlayStation template' games, then? if they enjoy it, what's the problem?
>DS2 is a better game than DS1
lmao hows that contoller dead zone or enemy spamming?
DS1 does not perfectly line up, especially the backgrounds, they're closse but still just skyboses.
DS2 only has 2 tunnels that physically interset and a lot more inconsistest skybosses.
I wouldn't know, I'm still stuck at the 30 buffed hollows that can 1 shot you in the DS1 church.
this
>DS2 is a better game than DS1, hence why DS3 uses more core mechanics from DS2 than DS1.
Like adaptability and restricted weapon turning?
I'm glad they took they 2handed vertical UGS moveset, though, because that's what it should've been like for DS1 and why greatswords were great compared to the ultras: 1handed with an optional shield for dealing with a group, 2handed with vertical slammin attacks.
they die in one hit litllay git gud
>he got filtered by fucking undead parish
LMAO
Looks like they line up perfectly to me
he’s referring to low LoD models of distant areas, for example looking up at firelink shrine from blighttown. he’s correct about them not being 100% lined up, but they’re extremely close. the most egregious example of them not lining up quite right is duke’s archives from sen’s fortress, and that’s because it would be mostly unrecognizable and obscured if it were in a 100% accurate location.
So do most enemies "spammed" by DS2.
every day there is a ds2 thread. every day I have the itch to finally play ds2. theres no way a game this controversial, and this shat on, and this unique, is a bad game. even if its a bad game Im sure its actually a good game if you know what I mean. I may stream my first playthrough once I get to it
Well yeah, DS1 is a shit game, uninstall right there and went to do another SL1 run in DS2 instead.
Much better :)
no they dont
yes
At the very least, it's far more thought out. DS2 is the opposite.
Can't say I blame them, considering the hill they were up against this time, but it still sucks.
cool blog retard, too bad no one asked.
>theres no way a game this controversial, and this shat on, and this unique, is a bad game
Yeah, it can't possibly be a bunch of spergs arguing against each other. No possible way in hell, right?
It has some bad looking textures/areas and like 6-7 weak bosses (out of 42).
Mechanically it's much better than DS1 without being the spamfest of DS3 or BB.
its shit and its a duty to tell people