Makes reach MP terrible

They didn't break bullet spread. Stop making shit up. The Carbine is still unusable.

Not even close, it's the worst selling halo by far

They did, bullet speed is halved in multiplayer

>spread
spread your cheeks

Bullet speed affects all weapons, and has nothing to do with spread.

Unfortunately for you I was already checking, third best, just slightly behind reach.

Attached: Screenshot_20200812-220426_Firefox.jpg (1050x1758, 402.13K)

I unironically love the DMR but that's the problem it's too good of a weapon to start with
The fact that the BR kind of sucks in 3 is why it's not so bad as a starting weapon although I still prefer AR starts

Yes.

Yes. So the Carbine's hit detection is as bad as every other weapon's right now.
The Carbine is way less accurate than the BR, for no reason.

Units sold mean nothing since they can be sold at a discount and say nothing about revenue and profits.

Let me guess, 10 year old sources?
halo.bungie.net/news/content.aspx?type=topnews&cid=7139

Oh, 15 year old sources. Good job wikipedia police. Now kill yourself

im using it now and can get more kills then with the br you just need to click faster brow and not aim

Attached: now.png (1440x810, 1.93M)

The Reach AR is literally the most powerful in the series besides the one in H5 that had headshot damage. Are you gay?

Carbine only fires one shot so you're less likely to miss. It's better than the BR now in Halo 3 MP

A single one of the Carbine's bullets is less accurate than a single one of the BR's bullets. It makes absolutely 0 fucking sense when the BR gives you multiple chances to hit per trigger pull.

A single BR bullet does a third the damage of the carbine, so it's better

That isn't one of the sources lol

Kill yourself

If a Carbine shot veers off course, you get 0% damage from that shot.
If a BR bullet does the same, you still have 2 more bullets that can potentially make up for it.
There is not a single reason why the Carbine should have more bullet spread than the BR.

The DMR was definitely cancer. It's hard to think of a way to solve it, especially with bloom in the equation. A worse base accuracy might have done some good, even when moderately bloomed it still was much too accurate

do you just receive a notification anytime someone makes a new halo thread?

Too bad the BR is even worse at range now than the Carbine thanks to the broken bullet speed, your point is moot and has a hint of actual autism

Nigger, you are fucking stupid. Spread is not speed, they are different words.
And regardless, projectile travel time is fucked on every weapon. Nothing is worse off compared to other weapons.

>Spread is not speed, they are different words.
Thanks for clarifying you're above 40 IQ

How do you fix it?

Attached: MA37_Assault_Rifle.png (1824x736, 340.3K)

Making a weapon designed specifically to be used as range inaccurate is stupid. Just make it a slow projectile weapon so it actually requires some finesse to be used at range. Then buff the other weapons so they're not such pushovers.
Apparently you're not because you keep relating the too.

What it could have been...

Attached: ReachBR.jpg (1920x1017, 136.66K)

Make it the Halo 3 AR.

make it have 60 rounds like combat evolved and shoot faster

It's actually really good if you don't max out the bloom like a sperg

who ever thought the DMR needed to also fill an anti material roll was out of his fucking mind. I will never understand why they thought it was a good idea.

15 shots to kill and faster bloom recovery. Nerf its autoaim to compensate for its increased power.

That might make it more viable in MP, but would ruin it in campaign. CE's AR sucked on higher difficulties and was only useful for fighting flood.

It's more like 1 in 3 BR bullets is more accurate than a Carbine shot. Maybe the second one is a little bit too I can't be fucked to care. There's some marginal positives to how the Carbine works (eg.if you outright whiff a shot it's less costly) but it's definitely worse overall.

>Nothing is worse off compared to other weapons.
Nah it definitely affects weapons with different travel speeds and ranges differently, but the Carbine and BR are basically identical in that respect.

It still wouldn't be viable with its pitiful damage and relatively slow fire rate.

>It's hard to think of a way to solve it
accuracy evaporates outside of red reticule range.
ez pz.

by getting good

Attached: reach_16437629_Full.jpg (1920x1080, 237.56K)

Partial damage is preferable to no damage at all. You need to land a lot of Carbine shots to kill. Isn't it 8 total in Halo 3?

Marketing made halo 3, your memories was a result of executives.

>that game that was really fun and everyone played?
>yeah you didn't like it, it was just marketing

It's harder to land shots with the br

yeah, making it too inaccurate would be stupid, but a slight reduction in accuracy to bring non-sniper engagement ranges closer is a solid move in terms of gampelay. The logic of how good the gun should be at range should be dictated by the dynamics of the game it belongs to. There would be nothing wrong with an accuracy halfway between its current state and the h3 carbine

It's about equal. The BR requires more time on target, but the Carbine is actively working against you with its terrible accuracy.

The Reach AR is honestly one of the worst in the franchise. You get very little back for the amount of skill you need to invest in it compared to other weapons.