Game developer here

Game developer here.
Was this supposed to impress me?

Attached: Fallout_New_Vegas.jpg (256x315, 36.81K)

lol what games have you developed, show us.

show us your games.

I have the feeling that you fags will trash on any game I show to you, so no, I'll not post my games.

Now answer my question: this pile of mediocrity was supposed to impress me?

This game is still making indy fags seethe huh?

You try implementing a bullet-per-bullet reloading animation in a bethesda game

hahahaha post your games faggot.

Fucking lmao. you're just some lying schmuck, you ain't made shit

i'm sorry if you disliked it,
please tell me what did you find to be not amusing or impressible about it?

this shit impressed bethesda so much they wanted to buy up Obsidian, which in retrospect would've been optimal

>westoid "game developer"
>Doesn't understand good game design
Surprising no one at all.

Go make Fez 2, Phil.

If you can't write C++ proficiently, you are not a developer. You are a diversity hire.

>avoiding the question
God, this board is so fucking pathetic it's absurd.

post game

no you should play anomaly if you want the real version

Suck my dick and choke on it, Phil Fish.

The fact that they were able to put something together in the gamebryo engine is amazing yes

Looping reload animations are actually really simple to program.
>but then why didn't Bethesda do it in 3, 4, or 76?
Good q.

>start post stating you're a game developer
>doesn't post credentials
Lmao youre a pussy or a liar

FNV actually is somewhat impressive from a game design standpoint
The way that it offers freedom in quests yet almost always accounts for the player doing things differently or in different orders
One thing you can say about FNV is that the devs made sure that everything felt cohesive and made sense despite the complexity of the game
I'm sure it wasn't easy to do (clearly it's not for Bethesda) although Obsidian had plenty of experience with that
In some ways it actually does things better than FO1 and 2 did

Hi Todd.

Why are people are replying to this 6/10 bait thread?

Based dev shitting on mediocre game. Combat and gameplay is a borefest, even with mods.

Bits or gtfo

Sorry your procedually generated asset flip didn't sell, Chuck.

In 2010 it was supposed to. Unfortunately devs nowadays are fucking trash so nothing has yet to top it.

oh fuck now i have too play it again, gonna make me a arizona ranger and go after texas red

If you can't see that the writing is top notch, you're illiterate my dude.

Attached: Ukraine_Ochipok_with_Kerchief.jpg (675x700, 173.53K)

I'm really curious where Obsidian as a company may have evolved if Bethesda bought them up, or what FO4 may have looked like

The problem here is that you saw a game that was well-loved and thought it should impress you based on that alone.

What you've ignored is why it's well-loved. It's running on an awful engine, is full of bugs, and is borderline unfinished. However, it's fun.

The game doesn't owe you shit. It doesn't have to impress you. You, as a "developer", are supposed to ascertain what makes a game enjoyable for yourself. That is what leads to a marketable product. If you think something is only liked because it impresses people, then you're as fucking stupid as Druchman thinking TLOU2 wasn't complete shit, or that Sony CEO who said "why would anyone play something so ugly" when he saw Gran Turismo 1 played next to GT Sport. You've missed the whole fucking point.