Which one looks better?

It is a very lazy line where the world simply ends, in a way no natural area would

Even the road simply ends for no reason.
If you were to walk over to it, you would see the end of the world.

I'd say both look pretty good in different ways?

Attached: shrugging.jpg (600x400, 29.13K)

Bottom
The lightning and character models in the top one make it look worse

Bottom actually looks really good (hopefully not a bullshot but they would've probably done that 1st off no?) hopefully it looks like that on my gamin PC

There are a few indie games that look that good already, so I wouldn't be too shocked if thats how the game looks at release.

this

This is actually a perfect example of the creative process through the lens of video game hardware.

The top image is what they made unrestrained, look at the basic geometry of the scene, look just how much is going on. In effect it is just a corridor but it doesn't look or feel like that, the pipes give depth and provide the feeling that there is more going on you just can't see it.
Conversely, the bottom image is what happens when QA comes along and says "This won't run on anything but our development systems, fucking fix it you retards".
The pipes are gone and even the non-pipe geometry is simplified, the area is larger but also lesser in a way, the fine detail that makes a location interesting is gone.

It's pointless talking about the distant view since that is subject to LoD culling, instead pay attention to what you've actually lost and imagine that process being applied to the entire goddamn game.

>HURR BOTTOM GOOD BECAUSE SHADER EFFECT

You people are so fucking basic, you spend your whole lives playing video games and yet you know nothing about them.
The bottom image is lesser in every way but you think it looks better because of a fucking post rendering shader. Which is exactly why this is happening, because you cunts eat it up.

>instead pay attention to what you've actually lost
its all eye candy graphics wise anyways (not like you can interact with the pipes and shit) and the bottom looks way better and fits the cyberpunk genre more than the top which looks like gta v

>retard thinks everyone around him is dumb due to projection and lack of self awareness
sad

That whole first video was just a bullshot pre-rendered video made to look like gameplay anyway.

I'll be very surprised if the game isn't delayed again.

>better indirect lighting
>better foliage rendering
>HURR DURR IT'S JUST COLOR GRADING
retard
also there is no "post rendering" shader. If it's a shader, it's applied during rendering.

lighting is completely different so you can't really compare the two that being said this game is gonna look like fucking dogshit on consoles

Both have chromatic aberration , completely unnecessary if you're not seeing through a lens.

is that not that one part of the map with all the civilians walking around and shit? I don't remember what trailer it was shown in, but it was one of the earlier ones

TOP: SOULLESS
BOTTOM: SOUL

this

Both look like they decided to make a guy who lost his glasses the protagonist.

doe's it matter how it looks? we're all just gonna cover it in reshade as soon as we get our hands on it anyways.

They both look like shit, look at the car and puddle reflection, awful

hahah bro that's matte black