Remove Random Crits.. or no?

Random crits are OK so long as they happen at funny moments

>wasting your one vote every 2 minutes when myg0ts are around

Attached: images (44).jpg (665x461, 15.68K)

Remove matchmaking first.

Random crits are not OK when they happen when I get bad spread on scattergun and hit only 1 pellet

Dane covered this idea in his video, basically people would instantly leave if whatever they wanted didn't get voted.

Attached: 1fb.png (2102x1183, 3.83M)

wiki.teamfortress.com/w/images/8/87/Sniper_taunts23.wav

Attached: Strange Rifles.jpg (1450x699, 539.19K)

if you first played tf2 after they introduced hats and shit then you don't get to have an opinion

dave is a faggot and a shitter

Remove matchmaking so people can stop bitching and just go play on a server with the option they like.
Dane is a faggot and this literally isn't true because plenty of server have implemented start-of-map RC votes and people rarely leave if it gets the one they don't want.

Attached: 1470195275940.jpg (500x500, 22.74K)

I've never played this garbage but competitive shooters should never have RNG elements to them. It should be as simple as possible for balance purposes.

keep them but get rid of the increased chance with damage done

Being able to back stab immediately after coming out of cloak was broken and I miss it

>but competitive shooters
TF2 isn't a competitive shooter. Half of the current problems with the game are because Valve started pandering to panicked compfags who thought Overwatch was going to kill the game. TF2 was primarily designed with a 12v12 semicasual playstyle in mind.

>Zig Forums used to be anticrits
>eceleb makes a popular video saying what everyone thinks
>Zig Forums suddenly loves random crits
every single time

Removing random crits just promotes sniperfaggotry. They should be kept.

>>Zig Forums used to be anticrits
>Zig Forums is one person

Attached: 1493358804774.png (1000x869, 1.17M)

I don't know any better because i've never played it. From the very few mp FPSs that i played on PS3, i personally hate when RNG is involved to win gunfights. Crits could give a shitter a chance to win while the good player wasn't lucky to score a crit despite having superior aiming/movement/map knowledge etc. It doesn't need to be a MLGsweatfest. It can be casual without the bullshit.

Non-melee can reach a max of 12% crit chance and melee is 60% max

Attached: 57c744fd1f211.png (512x512, 42.74K)

Why every games community always seethe at snipers? Headshots should always be 1h1k for these classes, torso 2hk and limbs 3hk. I don't play TF2 but people always seethe about snipers in every games.

>post your face when the cycle repeats yet again, overwatch dies and tf2 keeps on chugglin

Attached: 1594705165800.jpg (750x898, 72.33K)

Comp fags can remove it in their own games if they want, but leave it on in valve servers

Attached: angry heavy shit.png (500x500, 293.47K)

leave them on melee's only

Who cares what some shmuck on YouTube says? Post your own personal favorite kill screens instead!

Attached: F869DFB62AFF35ECFBAD0EFB2E229927909302EF.jpg (1920x1080, 405.92K)

To explain it to you, who's never played it:
Crits aren't entirely random. There's always a fixed crit chance, and said crit chance scales with three factors:
>How much damage the player has recently dealt
>How much damage the player's buildings have recently dealt
>How much damage the player's healtarget has recently dealt
Crits are also very visibly communicated to the player with a distinctive sound/animation/particle effect when they proc. The only time a crit will guarantee you getting gibbed is if the person who shot it was right in your face. Essentially, this means that TF2's casual side takes on this semi-strategic "risk management" factor that a lot of RPGs have, where you need to pay special attention to high-risk targets. This is even more of a factor if you're playing as the Spy, because the Spy has to be in melee range to be effective, and Melee weapons all have a maximum critrate of 30%.
I think people would hate random crits a lot less if there was a HUD indicator of your current critchance or something.

they make a certain kind of person seethe so i love em

I don't play these games but OW is definitely the worst FPS i've ever seen. It caters to coomers and esports cancer and a bonus; faggots.

Even if Overwatch dies, it still undeniably did more damage to TF2 than any other TFClone. I wish Overwatch had never existed for the sole reason that we probably never would have gotten matchmaking if it didn't.

based

>torso 2hk and limbs 3hk
Yeah, about that.

Thanks for the explanation user. Doesn't seem like a game i'd enjoy desu. My favorite multiplayer FPS was CoD4 back then. I just enjoy simplicity i guess.

you want to fix random crits? switch them to damage taken only. that way, you don't have a faggot soldier running around with his pocket medic gibbing you from around the corner

That's fair, and honestly, another reason I think this big stupid debate over random crits showed up is because before, people would just play on servers that turned them off. Now everyone feels like they have to play fucking matchmaking and it has the usual matchmaking problem of "nobody will ever be happy with such a generic ruleset" but nobody wants to admit that matchmaking was just a bad idea.

Attached: 1552007493838.jpg (880x1000, 180.2K)

Sniper is a black sheep class in TF2. Almost every other gun in the game functions based on damage falloff with distance, which makes most TF2 fights relatively long TTK which is where the most fun is. Sniper has 0 dmg falloff so relative to what you're used to in TF2, when you die to a sniper headshot it's a very "oh... that was 'fun' feeling" relative to dying in other fights.

that soldier who has medic up his ass takes more damage than anybody else because he can. In your idea he would get even more crits than everybody else