#NotMySoulsGames
#NotMySoulsGames
All Souls games suck and people pretend to like them because in the gaming community you get "Credibility points" if you like Dark Souls
ok pleb
Based. Soulshitters are the worst.
2 > 1 > 3
if you disagree you're wrong and probably have never enjoyed a game in your life
Not an argument, nobody in real life gives a fuck about Dark Souls or has even heard of it, it's only relevant on Reddit or Chan
Nah, some people just aren't shitters
I agree
Ok retard
Cope harder
Yes, yes you are.
Based. Soulsfags like to pretend their game is hard despite having i-frame rolls and the ability to recover your souls after death.
I think Bloodborne has a good run up until Rom, if a bit cramped.
DS2 and 3 are definitely less carefully put together
I think Sekiro has the same sense of wonder and mystery that the first two games have, but otherwise I agree with your assessment.
1>2>3 but I agree that 3 is garbage.
old good new bad upboat pls
I like them because they're fun
BASED
I HAVEN'T PLAYED ANY BUT BASED
Reminder that DS3 is a refined version of DS1 that instead of sacrificing level design for meme "interconnectivity" it creates sprawling and complex enviroments that have multiple actually useful passageways and shortcuts. This creates the feeling of large non linear enviroments without being constrained in gameplay by gimped level design
Only ResetEra trannies think 1 is superior
>B-b-but mah poise, I can't run through damage
Git gud
hahaha op is one of these dudes LMAO
Bosses have always been the least interesting part of these games for me. They are great for closing out the bigger sections of the game, but they really started overdoing it. The exploration is by far the strongest asset of the series, not the combat. And I think that the combat is better explored within the context of fighting balanced groups of enemies rather than in bosses.
People loved Ringed City even though it is shitty set pieces after set pieces with annoying gimmicks just because it had good bosses, while Ashes of Ariandel is seem as the lesser DLC, even though it has a much more cohesive design with great enemy encounters. It is clear to me that people tend to judge Souls content by bosses alone.
>3 bad
>where's my upvote
Demon's > Dark 1 > Dark 2 > Bloodborne > Dark 3
Bloodborne is good but Dark 3 is not.
Sekiro is equal with Demon's but is different enough that comparing it with them is dumb.
>Old good
>New bad
Sekiro is the newest one though. Cringing real hard at your post rn baka.
Every game with combat ever since has copied it in some way.
Yes. The series got worse with every release.
based DS3chad
1 > 3 > 2 is the definitive order
Filtered
Delusional
>roll and R1 spam: the game
>better than 1
lol
Ah yes the usual 2fag vs 3fag thread
I will never understand why 2 gets the hatred it does here and 3 gets nonstop praise
Sekiro and Ds2 are the only two good games in the pic.
blame reddit/summer Zig Forums
Dangerously based
move BB over and we have a deal.