Day 10 of tim sweeney sperging out on twitter despite having an “open and close slamdunk” case against apple

Anyone got that screencap of him sperging out over people purchasing ad space for competing apps, while defending buying ad space for competing engines?

>calmly explains how apple forces everyone to go through their app store
>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HE SPERGING

>TOS is not legally binding
They can be, or they cannot be, it depends on the TOS in question and the legal stance the court takes. It's fundamentally a grey area and until contested and affirmed or overruled it's not reasonable to say any single TOS is not legally binding. We'll find out, but my money is on Apple winning this.

It's their platform, i don't understand why they shouldn't be permitted to do what they want, just don't buy Apple products. Thus said i hope Epic will dilate Apple's anus but i strongly doubt a company owned by 40% by the chineses will make a proud American capitalistic company kneel during Trump administration

What does he even want? App Store has been the way to install apps on ios since forever. I hate Apple with a burning fire but timmy is being a retard here

This but unironically.

Terms or service and end user agreements are not legally binding
We settled this last decade

can’t wait for tim phones lol

>What does he even want?
more money

Sideloading apps on iPhone without jailbreaking.

see

Yes you're right, they're agreements, a company is legally permitted to ban you for whatever reason, they make ToS so you agree to respect the rules to avoid consequences, so legal bindings don't really matter in this case

Apple will never agree to that and timmy can't force them to.

>the platform
It’s a fucking Apple phone. Not a free marketplace. You think a Mercedes dealership is a free market for you to sell a car you made yourself?

You can already do that.

We're talking about smartphones, not cars. Does Mercedes make smartphones? Why bring them up?

>>still has the balls to complain about it and take the issue to court

Attached: SUE.jpg (1280x849, 331.63K)

If you make a business contract with a business, it is legally binding actually. This isn't a TOS like the retarded frog keeps posting. This is a contract.

The United States of America can.

The worst thing of all this is boomers believe him, and media spreads his bogus story for clicks
It's all a big clusterfuck where all the parties involved know it's fault but they want to stretch it for money

>5 iq post

>affirmed or overruled
It's more like affirmed or denied. "Overruled" presumes TOS have an authority before the fact, which the courts take away. They don't and it doesn't work that way. TOS are just conditions written down by a company, which only have or don't have clout when the judge makes a decision. They have no inherent value in themselves until the moment the judge imparts it. You're well within your rights to accept TOS and ignore them, so long as you're willing to spend on a legal battle and you've prepped for the possibility of losing.

And banning is not a crime. Your point?

>It's more like affirmed or denied. "Overruled" presumes TOS have an authority before the fact, which the courts take away.
There is inherent authority because a TOS is a contract, taking it to court is a contract dispute, it like all contracts have assumed authority until overruled by the courts.

exactly, you don't understand, so go and find out why this is an anti competitive behaviour and why for the same reasons MS was torn a new one, last decade

People, and by extension companies, should have the right to deny service to anyone, and no requirement to provide a reason.

Attached: 1547838451550.png (944x720, 499.31K)

Wait, is he fighting Apple because he doesn't want to put Fortnite on App Store? Exactly what laws does he think Apple is breaking?
>not viable for high end games like Fortnite
His head is so far up his own asshole it's actually kinda impressive.

Thanks Tim, great input

Bonjour, bonjour
We're at a place called Epic Games Store

Attached: u2-vertigo-ad.jpg (1920x1080, 43.16K)

But they won't

Question, does a company need to allow anyone access to to their ecosystem? Can't they just tell him we don't want you guys on iOS anymore and be done with it? It's not like Tim has to allow anyone onto his store.

Zig Forums loathes him because they loathe China and China owns Tim from the waist up.

EFF
PEE
BEE
PEE

Are you the guy who makes the
>say words
>lose $60
threads? Contracts and terms of service absolutely hold authority

They will, and so will the EU. It's over for Apple.

That too but you'd be surprised by the sheer amount of SJWs dickriding corporations just to "own the magats" and "racist incels".

I feel like Epic may have a had a point in the whole mess but their stupid bid to knowingly violate Apple’s terms so they could cry foul really detracts from their case. The argument that Apple doesn’t have the right to stop consumers from running non proprietary software on the hardware they own is sound, but Epic acted with the very clear and premeditated intent to violate their contract with Apple for no better reason than to provoke them. This victim angle Epic is playing just makes them look opportunistic and scheming. There’s any number of arguments Apple can use to defend their TOS and intellectual proprieties, and Epic would have to overcome every single one to prove Apple’s business practices are uncompetitive. Epic just created one more obstacle for themselves with their app store stunt

I need Tim to win so I can get a web browser that plays webms fuck you Steve Jobs.

You kids arguing they violated a TOS have been indoctrinated by online shit to think that its a contract. It is not, its the same as a EULA which doesnt hold a candle in court. Normally you'd be arguing semantics here but there's a difference, you can't give a run of the mill ToS the same legal value as a written, signed contract to which both parties agreed before anything was put into the storefront.
Tim violated an ironclad contract between companies, he didnt just click "I accept" when prompted.

Always acted like he's the center of the universe.

You are all worthless bacterial colonies.

Attached: download.png (245x206, 10.04K)

>You kids arguing they violated a TOS have been indoctrinated by online shit to think that its a contract.
It's a contract of adhesion it always has been, you're an idiot and don't understand what contracts are.

Meanwhile at Valve Gabe is silently trying to perfect VR for the future of porn and waifus.

Apple owns their platform, can't they decide whatever the fuck about anything that's on it? I'm no lawyer

I thought it was legal to kick them off of the apple store for breaking ToS. Who exactly does tim want to be put in jail for this?

They don't. The difference is if you want to download an app on iOS, you need to use the app store, there is no competition, on PC, if epic doesn't want you, you have steam, gog, itch.io and etc.

iOS is from apple so you may argue that only allowing their store is fair game, that's what Tim is fighting against, he thinks it's a monopoly, and allowing other stores would be better for devs and consumers.

How about he develops his own smartphone and stops being such a little bitch

Sent from my iPhone

Attached: 1ADD4DF9-61B5-43B8-8118-DC72430BCB53.jpg (1125x219, 68.99K)

No I really would not.

Attached: 1591977958874.png (843x1000, 260.92K)

Based tim.
.