I hope you're not expecting to see Elden Ring at Gamescom Zig Forums, it won't be there

OOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHH

>inb4 some retard bitches about dragonrot not mass murdering essential NPCs and softlocking your playthrough
Cut content does not mean unfinished. It means Miyazaki decided against it.

Sekiro................. isn't a souls game.......

>.......................
how you doing there xXSEPHIROPHXx? been a while

It will.

Yeah if their ''unfinished'' means recycling bosses and areas much more than any other Souls game then I dunno what is finished.

Eh, Sekiro is a Souls game in the same way Bloodborne is also a souls game.

just take as long as needed to actually fulfill the intended vision of the game. every time i read about das3's intended progression i get sad.

what area in sekiro is recycled?

OHHHHHHHHHHH Elden Ring

Literally every boss area.

>das3's intended progression
You mean the original progression that Miyazaki scrapped because he thought of something he preferred? Or the ridiculous muh snakes fanfiction some dumbass made up in a greentext that only underages fall for?

The only one I can think of is the top of Ashina Castle.

You got me good

fuck off stevie

Attached: Stevie-from-Malcolm-in-the-Middle[1].png (615x437, 579.6K)

Not him but saying DS3 or any DS game didn't have cut content because of deadline is straight up delusional. You're just being a contrarian faggot for the sake of it.

The day people stop replying to shitposters will be the day you see actual videogame conversation, you're part of the problem user

DS3 absolutely had cut content. Because of the deadline? Who knows? I don’t, and neither do you.

>Who knows? I don’t, and neither do you.
And how the fuck do you know this then:
>You mean the original progression that Miyazaki scrapped because he thought of something he preferred?

Because it’s a way less nonsensical assumption than “Gundyr was supposed to be in Oceiros’ room but they scrapped it because of time constraints despite the fact that Oceiros’ room and Gundyr are both in the game with 0 unchanged elements from their respective previews”.

>Because it’s a way less nonsensical assumption
So you're just saying things out of your ass while criticizing people for doing the same thing because what you said is less "nonsensical" cause you said so?

i was referring to gods grave in my original post here . there was originally a sensible area for oceiros to be. gundyr was going to be the king of lothric. the giant bridge leading to the settlement was a more substantial zone. differing sun phases tgat eve tually result in a darkened firelink (repurposed as the untended graves which feel 'thrown in there' without the proper context) with sullyvahn as the final boss. the plans for the game just make a lot more sense than the world design of the final game. bloodborne has its own original plan being better issue (start in hemwick, lecture building actually being part of byrgrnwerth, among other things) but they covered that up better than in das3.
what would be cool is of elden ring is as finished-feeling as sekiro is. the only part of sekiro that feels unfinished to me is mibu village and the bit leading up to it. corrupted monk being fought twice in succession clearly indicates something wasn't finished but otherwise sekiro appears complete in its realization.

id be more excited for a new bakugan game than elden ring