Why did rockstar become so pozzed?

Why did rockstar become so pozzed?

Attached: red dead feminism.png (1260x947, 195.42K)

I genuinely can't imagine living like this, constantly trying to be victimized by fiction and pretending the world is out to get you constantly.

Attached: 1323575988893.jpg (360x267, 19.99K)

Like being a nigger?

This reads like Bizarro-Anita wrote it.

Attached: isbigweldgonnahavetopopacapinanigga.jpg (710x638, 100.07K)

>get the victim card finally
>but without the gibsmedat
Damn. Oh well.

Look at the hiring/firing
There's almost certainly a pattern there

404 coming soon

Don't you know that straight white men are literally Hitler?!?!?

it's basically historical revisionism, anyone who has a modicum of knowledge of that time period knows that the characters are bumfuck retarded and no one or basically no one acted like that. It'd get a pass if it were an alternate history kind of setting but it's not.

>identity politics 2016fag gets filtered by generic rockstar cowboy game

Buy the micro transactions goy, you don't need storylines

Be glad, being able to comprehend the mindset of tumblrtards who get triggered by video games is more of a curse than anything.

What the fuck do you mean? Suffragattes were absolutely a thing back then. As were anti-racists. They just weren't as prominent.

>missing the point so much

it certainly bugged me that you couldn't go whoring in this game, especially since there are whores that offer.

They genuinely don't give a fuck. They were just covering their asses because leftists are annoying cunts that freak out over everything. I still enjoyed it.

Next game I make will have a female protagonist just to make polcels shit themselves in anger.

Attached: when anon sees a female lead.gif (400x400, 1.62M)

>historical revisionism
The game has fictional territories like "Lemoyne" and "New Hanover" and geographically there is nothing like the world in RDR2 in real life, it's a patchwork of different influences from different states into a fictional setting in America. It was not historically accurate from the very beginning.

>buying or playing anything from a "AAA" "developer" in the current year

Attached: 1366817053401.png (1920x1200, 1.25M)

Well, this is just the state of the industry.
As long as people pay for this garbage it will only get worse and worse.

Sadie was a great character and if you think she was just "muh femail representation" I don't know what to tell you.
The suffragettes were annoying and very unaware of real life problems, so I don't really see how they were being portrayed as morally right at any point, not to mention they were only in one mission and the mission was short.
The Indians were actively in a war with white people. If you came in with a gun they would freak the fuck out. Also there were multiple places in the map where you couldn't take out your weapons; this wasn't unique to the reservation.
There's no argument here, so I can't rebut anything.
The naming filter is literally cancer. I tried naming my horse "Switchblade" and it got filtered because "blade". After this occured I fire bombed a police station and stabbed a bunch of women. Yeah, but thank God I couldn't type the word "blade" in my single player game, that would be fucked up.

Good thing i never played the singleplayer so far i've just been hunting down players playing as nogs online, tying them up and letting my horse shit on them

I really didn't care much about everything but the part that pissed me the fuck off isn't Sadie as a character but how everyone treats Sadie with kid gloves.

>Bill gets group into a shootout
>"Hurr durr you're a fucking retard Bill, goddamn queer you always screw up you parasite."
>Sadie gets group into a shootout
>"..."
>Sadie gets innocent guy killed
>"Hey I kinda liked that guy!"

Oh how I could imagine the writers patting themselves on the back for this shit.

Anita's criticisms were for the most part well thought out and had decent fou foundation in reality. Her biggest gripe was how women always have to be pretty where as men are allowed a large array of bodytypes and facial features. Just look at Zig Forums every time there is a non-beautiful female character to see she's right. (Abby from TLOU 2, Alloy from Horizon Zero Dawn...)
Even if you disagree with her you have to agree that that has strong basis in reality and is at least a justifiable opinion to have. She only became vilified because:
>YouTubers strawmanned her for clicks
>Her reluctance to appear in debates (mainly because she was working with a script 90% of the time)
>Zig Forums proving her right at every step

Attached: 9k=.jpg (275x183, 5.92K)

>Anita's criticisms were for the most part well thought out and had decent fou foundation in reality
All of her criticisms have been refuted by many people to which she never argues back to counter. She just asserts surface-level differences and concludes = systemic sexual oppression. It's the same old grift.

Attached: Anita the grifter.jpg (1280x720, 107.43K)

That's not her criticisms that's a personal attack on her. See what I mean?

>not naming your horse Horse
What kind of outlaw are you

>That's not her criticisms that's a personal attack on her
I'm not listing and countering every single criticism she makes that others have done. I am offering my opinion on your comment about her.

Being mad that RDR2 isn't 100% accurate to history when it doesn't take place in a real setting is like being mad that South Park isn't actually a place in Colorado. It's an everyman location meant to contextualize the story and its characters as well as their drama and relationships. No one plays RDR2 with the explicit intent of living out a 100% realistic, true to history cowboy fantasy unless they're stupid, just like no one watches fucking South Park because they want the news.

>Just look at Zig Forums every time there is a non-beautiful female character to see she's right.
But this isn't because they're female, this is because they're ugly and unpleasant to look at. Look at Watch_Dogs 2's main antagonist or again Abby to see what I'm talking about. WD2's antagonist looks like a walking blob with fat rolls and Abby looks like some sort of roid addict with a male physique in a post-apocalyptic scenario when pretty much every other woman is either fighting for their life looking pretty normal or some muscle mass but also still normal like Tess. Even someone like Kassandra in Assassin's Creed Odyssey looks like a fridge because her model is literally the man's model and it looks awful on her.

The difference here is that male characters aren't made to look ugly as sin or unappealing whereas female characters for some reason must now be toned down in feminine appeal significantly. It would be like if in the next Uncharted you had to play as Doughnut Drake in a serious manner. People are fine with toned down sexuality, just look at Tomb Raider and what they did with Lara Croft, but this doesn't mean you need to make your women look like Scooter's sister from Borderlands 2.

>anti-anita tards can't actually read
are you legitimately surprised anymore, user? Anita Sarkeesian should go down in history as the most controversial person no one actually tried to debunk

>Her biggest gripe was how women always have to be pretty where as men are allowed a large array of bodytypes and facial features.
This is because male attractiveness is based on status, and female attractiveness is based on beauty.

Worse than any of that is how railroaded every mission is and if you dare to go even slightly off the tracks you get a GAME OVER

oh the ironing

>Anita Sarkeesian should go down in history as the most controversial person no one actually tried to debunk
thunderfoot did and tore her a new asshole

They were always shit, the Poz is just icing.