Why didn't Nintendo hire this man instead of blatantly stealing his idea?
Why didn't Nintendo hire this man instead of blatantly stealing his idea?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
patreon.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
NINTENDO
Because one option costs them money, while the other is free.
>guy takes Nintendo's IP and tries to make money off of it
>Nintendo shuts him down
>Zig Forums acts like Nintendo was the bad guy
Hm.
Except the mario royale is way better and more inventive than nintendo's soulless copy
Could anything actually replace this? It was so pure in its fun that literally anyone could enjoy it.
I kinda like the option of Nintendo's more of enemies becoming trash for another player. Imagine the cheep cheep levels.
STEAL FROM THIS MAN
>guy takes Nintendo's IP and tries to make money off of it
He didn't.
games aren't similar at all, go choke on another dick OP
Why didn't he just make his own game?
>literally anyone could enjoy it.
Except people that didn't get the star...
The guy tried to promote himself in every way too, even a video on youtube showing the "huge" achievement of applying Battle Royale on SMB he did.
because nintendo is transphobic
>tries to make money off of it
There was no money involved at all.
Yeah but the game was free.
In all likelihood, Nintendo was already working on their version way before Mario Royale happened. Also begging for Patreon money to run a game that's essentially a total ripoff of someone else's IP is very bad form no matter how you slice it.
Unlikely, things like these tend to be essentially lightning in a bottle. Trying to recapture the magic is an exceedingly difficult task.
Corporations aren't your friends. They keep taking down fan games, but if they copy another game it's ok. If a company could literally steal your money and everything you own without legal and social repercussions, they would do it.
Corporations aren't your friends.
didnt he set up a patreon for it or was that NSMBZ
Because he was using a famous series and the fad to try to promote himself as a game developer.
it actually surprises me people keep trying shit with nintendo's ips expecting them to associate with them and get shut down every fucking time
InfernoPlus has a patreon but it's for his youtube.
source : patreon.com
Because Nintendo didn't stole it? Mario 35 plays more like Tetris 99 where you can specifically target other player. Also no screen clutter so it's more skill based game
because mario belongs to nintendo you stupid fucking faggot
What's wrong with that? He still didn't make a single cent directly from the game.
Zig Forumsintendo at it again
I think you mean they stole the idea from this youtube.com
Why didn't the guy who made that make it from the off with his own assets instead of stealing someone else's?
why pay money when you can steal his idea for free?
Because he was doing it for fun and not with goals of monatery gains? If anything, he wasted money on this because of servers hosting.
Because the only way to succeed anymore is to lech off of a big brand. Everyone will ignore anything that's not already famous, regardless of how high its quality is.
There is no problem, autist. I'm just saying that he tried to promote himself with the game. After Tetris99 it became commonplace to imagine old battle-royale series, the guy just did it with SMB and for some reason he thought it would be a positive point in his "career".
Nintendo cannot apply this because they are not able to offer online without lag. That's why they separated the players on different independent screens.
because he did that anyway, and was still cockblocked. The idea of having a game that plays like Mario being played by people who like Mario is sacrilegious to the Ninyakuza lawyers.
After he was hit with the first potential lawsuit, he remade the game with original assets, but the game's mechanics and levels were too close to the original anyway so Ninty shut it down.
Lies, a lot of indie games with original characters and themes have recently appeared and many of the characters have become iconic.