What do you think of DONTNOD's new groundbreaking game?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>game
Dontnod has only made one video game in their entire lives and no one REMEMBERS it
>top surgery
huh?
surgery for their chest area.
Breast reduction
OHNONONONONONONOONONONOO
They cut off a woman's breasts so that she can look like a man. They charge upwards of $50,000 for this privilege. Recently they did it to that child actress from Sabrina en.wikipedia.org
This affects me.
This tells me how I'm going to be treated in gaming.
>en.wikipedia.org
WHAT THE FUCK LMAO
More like "Tell me why you cut off your breasts"
this nigga already flat as fuck i don't know it needs top surgery
>photos of happy children playing
>there's a little corner of the house where the parents have put these precious memories on display
>HA, CAN'T WAIT TO SELL THEIR HOUSE AND USE THE MONEY TO CUT OFF MY TITS
WHAT THE ACTUAL LEGITIMATE FUCK IS GOING ON
I remember reading that Angelina Jolie cut off her tits because she had family history of breast cancer.
Is it funny out or is it episodic mumbo-jumbo bullshit again?
I heard that it's outright boring more than anything else.
it's not episodic.
it's divided into "chapters"
The hot chick from Married With Children had it done also, but she was already riddled with cancer and it was either that or risk chemo.
>gamer gate
That article is full of lies and hyperbole.
I don't nod.
i think i don't care about anything dontnod does.
Kind of shit that they spoil the end of the game by making a trans character
>burning coal theatre
Kek.
explain
Isn't this an Xbox SeX Exclusive?
Since it's not a trash PS5 exclusive we can like it right?
/thread
oh, I was just being silly. It's episodic, but they call them "chapters" instead of "episodes" now
>How much diversity do you want?
>Yes.
so the first thing you should do as a celebrity is publicly change how you identify on social media, then try to edit your own wiki entry. these changes will be reverted and you'll verify that you are the person in question, and then they'll post autistically about editing your own page and how you don't qualify as a reliable source. then you complain to some low-quality blog like brietbart about how wikipedia denies your identity. then when they cite a reliable source, change how you identify and repeat.
Did anyone even play that game?
She made up that excuse to get implants
The parts are only released a week apart from each other, and the only option is to buy the entire game. I think they're hoping to drive a TV show-like sensation of discussion.
It is technically episodic but they've already finished everything because each episode is only released a week from the previous one, so it was purely a creative decision I guess. Probably to let the content of each episode settle in your brain to think about for a bit or some shit.
its bottom to top gay sex role conversion
not a bad idea if your story has enough hooks for people to speculate about
>Wikipedia
>reliable sources
Lmao
it's just jargon user-kun i'm not endorsing wikipedia, which is run by autistic freaks that deserve to suffer
Feels kind of pointless when it's only three parts over the course of two weeks, though. And reviewers already got to play the entire thing to comment on it as a whole.
>neutral point of view
>sources can be biased