Would you prefer if Mario 64 were given a similar treatment to Crash Bandicoot's Nsane trilogy than just a remaster?

soulless garbage? no thanks

Attached: DORRY.jpg (2200x1050, 316.65K)

ugh

thats not possible to render in real time

Of course any one would. Nintendo manchildren in full denial and corporate defense mode will say no and whip up bullshit how it's actually better at 1996 tier graphics

Attached: IMG_4193.jpg (686x447, 38.23K)

then you aren't trying hard enough

i dont control nintendo's hardware. unless they made the switch $2000+, its not gonna work

only if it used these graphics , the hardware is a looooooong ways away.

That shitty mod doesn't count.

Well they might not remove all the soul from it but they resell it for $60 dollars to create more stuff that's not for the core fans, the non casual players, of Nintendo and lots of people agree to do that it seems. I mean at least all digital buyers who do not profit from that.

Not really. Many of the Mario games play well enough as they were when they were first made. Graphically, they were pretty good for the time. Having better graphics would be great, like what was done for the original All Stars, but it's not necessary.
It's a different story for Crash. PS1 graphics were pretty shitty any change in that regard should be welcomed.

Whatever makes Zig Forums seethe is what I would pick.

Is there any coherent and unbiased reason to play it on Nintendo hardware when a PC port exists?

No. Remakes take away the SOUL and original artistic intent. A simple upscale is all we need. At least for platfomers anyway, where its impossible to perfectly replicate the mechanics without some weirdness happening. I don’t mine remakes for RPGs and such

I can pay nintendo for this port and play it on my switch, docked or portable. The PC decomp requires me to break copyright law (lol), download it from a tranny discord, and the have to sit at PC to play it.

that's literally odyssey

It should've been but Nintendo knows it can get away with selling ports to their childish fanbase. They don't have to put any real effort into alot of their products and its not even the first time they've done it.

Attached: A Bandibabe 2.png (768x1041, 463.79K)

Fuck no.
It really is disgusting how we now all of a sudden have tons of defending or outright arguing in favour of the absolutely disgusting mistakes that was the garbage that Toys for Bob put out.

Even if you hate Nintendo, this is a really pathetic low to lower yourself to.

Attached: 1541022539938.webm (942x1080, 2.93M)

I bet these people think Bluepoint's remakes are good too.

Made by a company who never gave a crap about Spyro as evident by their rushed production and hiring of pajeets for the product too. But do you honestly think Nintendo wouldn't make sure people didn't fuck up a 64 remake? Miyamoto would draw and quarter them if they botched it.

Attached: color-page-004.jpg (1275x1650, 262.68K)

Do we really need 4 fucking SM64 threads?

>But do you honestly think Nintendo wouldn't make sure people didn't fuck up a 64 remake?
I'd like to think so. But they're Zelda remakes all had pretty glaring flaws. To varying degrees. So I don't know. I am pretty confident they'd fuck it up somehow.
And I am very happy and relieved that they're just doing the original games instead.

No. Port older games and make completely new games. Enough of this remake bullshit.

No because it plays just fine.

I would just want better graphics but the same exact gameplay.

They should've done what the Render96 project is doing

Attached: HD_Mario_64.png (864x1796, 605.96K)