Well, Zig Forums?

>not being able to sympthize with the point of view of a spoiled princess

A shame it's such a shitty encounter. She dies super fast and it never gets mentioned again. Letting her go is so much better since she gets impaled and you have an extra quest with Triss.

The problem is that what would Geralt do? He's not a goody two shoes, sparing her after trying to start a war and using him is ridiculous, Geralt is not a diplomat that gives those kind of speeches, killing her for using him is too much, dunno if Geralt would let her go, he's not into politics so i suppose he would.

Attached: EcnnifhU0AAiza0.jpg (1200x675, 116.84K)

I let olgierd die on my second playthrough as well. Kino ending, I don't remember why he was deserving of sympathy anyways

because he was cool and gives you iris.

"Not in the mood." implies he would be up for it at another time while "Sorry. There's someone else." indicates he's taken.
In a conversation, such details matter.

Keep in mind it all comes from her favor that he accepts. Your idea of Geralt probably wouldn't have even accepted especially after he hunted down a bottle of wine.

Attached: The Witcher 3 2020.08.19 - 09.04.24.79.jpg (3840x2160, 1.96M)

>such details matter.
To what extent? I doubt whoever he's talking to will come back in 13 hours asking "Are you better now?"

What point are you even looking for?
As far as dialogue options go, a yes or no question having yes, no, and a maybe later, is pretty damn good.

3 options

>convince her to give it up and go to Kaer Morhen
>let her go to Radovid seeking asylum
>get pissed she used you for personal gain and cut her down right then and there

The first option is the only way she survives the game, plus getting her help during the battle at Kaer Morhen. The second leads to you finding her impaled on a pike in Novigrad's town square and a side quest where you help Triss recover the body for a proper burial. The third just ends with you killing her. As far as I know, only thing it affects is dialogue later on.

>Impaled on a pike in Novigrad town square

Kek, so she does end up getting killed for being a sorceress. Stupid bitch.

>Stupid bitch.
Or bro, if you treat her like a normal person would.

That choice is always really hard for me to make. I usually choose to save him because I'm a sucker for second chances and he genuinely feels like a remorseful person for the shit he did. But at the same time, he did a lot of shitty things for selfish reasons, like killing his own brother to seal his contract with O'Dimm, and the whole reason we got tangled up in his story was because of his antics.
Moral dilemma aside, it definitely pays off more to let him die, since most of the rewards are useful for the rest of the game and the sword gets replaced as you continue to level.

Yeah, Radovid is pretty across the board relentless in his hate of magic-users. Thats why I almost always choose to kill him to spare Novigrad the genocide that happens in the epilogue if he wins the war. Fuck letting Ciri become empress, Emhyr deserves dying like a bitch for his warmongering

I did.

NO
WAY
FAG

You're a fucking retard. Sorcerers are the jews of the witcher world. They constantly murder, rape, commit acts of terrorism, etc etc. They literally have lodges to decide the fate of the wrold, and if they don't like a ruler, they murder him.

The fact that you think he's in the wrong for killing magic users, PEOPLE WHO CAN LITERALLY SET AN ENTIRE VILLAGE ON FIRE, or get an army of skeletons to conquer the world, IT'S FUCKING RETARDED.

It seriously bothers me how people see the most powerful beings in the world as "oppressed minorities", pro mages in Dragon age are the same, you're all fucked in the head

Attached: Sips drink.png (345x437, 264.29K)

t. nazi cop

The lodge of sorceresses was indeed a cabal meant to guide the world, that was pretty self-serving as time went on. Radovid was justified in his dislike of it as an institution, and even justified in taking measures to dismantle it, but his paranoia grew to a radicalized fevered rage against any and all that used magic. This included healers, pellars, soothsayers, people that literally had limited magical capabilities and made their living by helping others.
If you can't see a distinct line that gets crossed during Radovid's actions in the series, you might be a little too smooth-brained to enjoy a story like this one.

>2 playthroughs
>did the same choices

im such a pussy i cant do anything else. i think cause the games so long and you have to live with those choices for a long time.

>smooth brained

chapo check

You're a retard. The Witcher world, our world, ANY WORLD, is full of selfish evil people. Your whole "ohhh b-but they help peoplee!!". Who? Who helps people? Some shitty herbalist that knows how to make a fucking bomb that would make boston bomber jealous?

All magic users, whether good or bad, are extremely dangerous for anyone. You're a retard who expects to let people who can set you on fire by clapping their hands to be goody two shoes. Guess what ,they will not be, if you're born with unlimited power, you're gonna use it for yourself.

So quit being a little retard and start worrying about safety instead of your deluded "everyone is good! yaaay!", go back to reading little riding hood or something.

you're basically arguing that all intelligent people should be killed because some of them are bad

full retard

user. That's the most pathetic straw man I have ever seen.
> M-maybe we should regulate magic users, since they can literally KILL MILLIONS BY CLAPPING THEIR HANDS

> Woah you're literally saying people who are smart are evil!!!

>what is world war 2

So what are the little secrets you found in the game?

Now do a playthrough as Asshole Geralt. It's fun