You can't build a gaming PC with those specs for $299. not only that, its faster than the PS5. game over sony

you can't build a gaming PC with those specs for $299. not only that, its faster than the PS5. game over sony.

Attached: Untitled.png (1353x908, 358.44K)

APU a shit.

bump

kys underage b& faggot

im 32 and you just mad Xbox will win the console war faggot.

PCfag here, yes I know you can't beat a console on price to performance. I don't care, I don't play on PC for price/perf. That said...

AMD has a GPU that can do 1440p 60-120fps in a $300 console. They are going to put serious pressure on Nvidia to bring their prices down and/or performance up. I welcome the series s

>32
>thinks like a kid
So sad

People are mocking it gut it is going to sell like crazy. You just watch.

The only way to be happy at 32 is to wish and act like you are a kid again
t. 33 year old

Can we just buy one rip it apart and use it to build or add to a pc?
Like why the hell not?

Pretty sure you can with the used Optiplex method and a 1650 method. If you're aiming only at 1080p/1440p you're not really needing to try all that hard.

I like the 299 price of that console but it's not really all that interesting to me if I were simply to upgrade my desktop's CPU/GPU. If I am simply aiming for 1080, 300 dollars worth of upgrades is far more than I need for a GPU, SSD's are dirt cheap. Hell my 1050Ti still plays most shit fine at 1080, might to to 900p if I want more frames but still looks better than consoles

Attached: 1590005025990.jpg (276x348, 31.6K)

sony fags just mad. i won't be surprise if the series s outsold the series x cause of the low price. due to the rona virus and people being unemployed

only an equivalent processor is more than $300. People who argue at this time that PC gaming hardware is cheaper are straight up delusional.

you guys are overselling the 1440p thing, it can't run 60FPS on modern titles without stuttering. No way RDNA2 4tflops can deliver that. That's just them stating the max resolution it'll go to, it's a 1080p machine, especially later on in the gen when actual next gen games come out.

PC was never about cost per value, and Xbox is irrelevant and a pussy repellant.

>digital only
lmao

Not even mad, I actually am kinda close to considering it. The problem is I just don't want to pay 299 when I could just simply invest that back into my current desktop that probably will play most xbox games worth a shit. Buying something that essentially will be a netflix box seems silly

consoles are at their most valuable at launch when the tech they have in the box is actually new. You'll be able to beat series s performance per dollar in 4-5 years

You know this will push more to the death of retail?

Bruh people are still gaming in 1080p just fine with 2500k's from almost 10 years ago at this point.

Yeah, but then I'd have to play my games on a console.

>gamma
>brightness

Here are your graphical options, bro.

Big gotcha, with these consoles vs the PC comparison is that people forget consoles are all operating with dynamic resolution scaling and doing tricks with textures to make them load in right. Tons of games do it in the non pro versions, this console is going to have issues down the road where it will only operate in dynamic resolution scales only

dont forget your massively overpriced external ssd if you want to install more that 2 games

Attached: muh ssd.jpg (809x909, 87.8K)

I thought it was all about TFLOPS, what happened?

the holes are unsettling

This argument is so fucking stupid. PC does more than play Xbox games.

>comparing new box to used garbage
try to be less of a faggot in the future

>digital only
And just like that, you've lost me.

Well I don't know how that box will perform either so who knows. I'm not going to trust MS/Sony when they say their $300 box totally outperforms a 2080 I swear guys. Yeah no, they always will try to compensate how those boxes perform to woo people to buy them, yesterday it was supercharged PC today it is you'll need a 2080ti to match a Series X, ok sure Microsoft. Does your Ryzen even run at similar clockspeeds compared to a desktop Zen 2 CPU? Cause from the information about it boosting to 3.5GHz, that's laptop tier Ryzen performance already. In fact there are some Zen 2 laptops like the Zephyrus G14 that have higher boost clocks than 4GHz so yeah we talking sub laptop CPU performance

most normie faggots have some form of pc that may or may not play games but will never use it for that purpose, stop conveniently missing the point

So?
Invest a little more into something you already need anyway.
Easier to justify than spending 500 on a dedicated toy.

goddamn, you are still missing the point
consoles are normie boxes, no manufacturer cares that you could upgrade a pc when there's still a market for consoles

They already demoed gears 5 running at 1440p ultra at 120fps
AMD clearly has something good on their hands, why do you think Nvidia basically pulled down the TITAN to the consumer card lineup. Nvidia needs that absolute performance crown and they are scared of RDNA2

fucking this
nvidia's top end hardware is getting bodied by software-level dx12u shit and an integrated graphics chipset
must be embarassing

Acting like you’re in your 30s means being depressed.

Because the Titan brand name is no longer valuable. The 3090 is still a very expensive card. Also RTX 2000 had high fleecing values and the sales were reportedly underwhelming, especially given how AMD had no answer for multiple tiers of RTX cards

Yeah, consoles have their place because they offer the idiot proof experience.
PC is still the most cost effective option for me.