was he right?
Was he right?
I can't wear dress shirts like this. Too much chest hair. Anything undone after the collar button and that shit is crawling out.
Trim your chest hair you wild beast
Except being a war profiteer while condemning war profiteering.
Yeah.
how about "full of shit"?
Shut up Jack
Greek or Italian?
Yes.
Too ruthless for fembrains though.
Of course he was
Only weak men would disagree with him
The only thing he did wrong was losing
Children's brains, though.
both fascists and communists used war profiteering to boost their economy
doesn't mean they are both the exact same thing
But at least he left a worthy successor.
might makes right and he lost to stronger might so yes
Understandable goal
Disastrous method
I really like his "fuck this 24/7 stream of internet bullshit" energy, but unfortunately his ideology boils down to some sort of ancap society where might makes right so Ill have to disagree with him. Its tragic that a man of his tenacity and willpower threw his weight behind such a shit ideology.
doesnt matter.
raiden prove his point,
his speech is literally what turned the game from good to kino
No and only fat edgly Zig Forumstards who would get culled in his world think it is. He was a colossal fucking retard
I love his speech, the issue is if you actually look at what he is saying its a shit goal to strive for.
how is "moght makes right" not true?
everything in society works because it is backed by the possibility of violence.
the only reason presidents are instated after a democratic vote is because of fear of violent retaliation if they don't instate them
the only reason you obey laws and pay taxes is because of the possibility of violent retaliation if you refuse to
I don't know but I do know that he's a very fun final boss and a great way to end the game.
He identified correct problems but proposed shit solutions.
I think he was being an accelerationist. In other words, be as destructive as possible so the government/gay society breaks down and enters a new one of freedom that values old american ideals. I don't know, it's kind of vague. You could argue that he was trying to become a strongman of a fascist dictatorship and was appealing to old fashioned virtues to look good. Kojima is a faggot communist so it was probably something like that.
When you vote you're using force.
And force is a form of violence, the supreme authority from which all authority is derived.
He wasn't just about "might makes right", he was a lot more about creating a sort of anarcho capitalist framework where truly free people would be able to prosper without limitations.
He wasn't wrong necessarily, but he was a perfect example of why ends do not justify the means. If he wanted to create the land of truly free he should not have infringed upon freedom of others, no matter how hard it would be to build his dream with such limitations.
Did you listen to him at all? He was clearly an acceleratonist striving towards some kind of anarcho capitalism. He doesn't care about Nations or collectives, he places individual above everything, he isn't a fascist or a nazi by definition.
But he wanted to create a more free society so that the strong and powerful would... lead... or something
He wanted to get enough funding with the help of war economy to destroy government and large pmcs like world Marshall from inside. Then he would create an individualist Utopia, more in line with Anarcho capitalism or Randyan objectivism, where truly free people would be able to fight and create their destiny at will.
He calls those who do not want to forge their own fate weak, as in those who want to be part of the watered down "collective" are his enemies and the ones who are weak.
>the last two are strawmen lacking the base concept of "pointing to a false discrepancy" by making the examples overtly nonsensical, to a point where they're completely removed from the narrative they're trying to mock.
>In the first one the "turning point guy" might actually be making an argument against complaining about how commodity hardware producers do business while consuming said nonessential products.
>but we'll never really know since the writer of this comic is pulling the "I'm silly.." routine albeit without the oversized heads.
the point seems to have flown so far over your head there
you just know the artist owns an Iphone and got completely BTFO'd by the orange shirt guy's argument IRL
Of course not, but thats what made him cool.
A man should follow his dreams