> NDA lift post poned to the 16th
What is nvidia trying to hide
> NDA lift post poned to the 16th
What is nvidia trying to hide
Other urls found in this thread:
videocardz.com
twitter.com
probably some shit about the temps, I don't like the look of the fact that the whole entire card is a heatsink that would put the 400 series to shame
OH NO NO NO NVIDIABROS LOOKS LIKE WE’RE GONNA GET BTFO BY AMD AS USUAL
Yeah
videocardz.com
It draws way too much power for little improvements...
>NDA Lift
>Several tech reviewers already giving reviews and "non-descript" comparisons.
They aren't trying to hide anything.
That you're getting a 20-25% performance boost compared to the 2080ti while also consuming 30% more power despite a die shrink.
Seconding temps but I'm betting it's to do with the retarded way they design the airflow where it cooks the rest of your system.
Nvidia engineers probably went to the iPhone 4 school of design where robots and computers are used to calculate the perfect product but the moment it touches human hands, or in this instance is put inside of a computer case, it turns out to be utter garbage.
why do you think they're pushing dlss and raytracing so much, because their normal performance is dogshit and you need a machine learned driver update to make it better. You're basically paying for a subscription for dlss driver updates that could be discontinued whenever nvidia wants.
>being a day-one fag
>ever
Are you fucks seriously going to do this still, even after this sudden delay?
This should be raising several red flags. If you disregard them, that is literally all you if something goes wrong, and no one will care if nothing goes wrong
Man, I really hope Nvidia wasn't lying out of their ass and now trying to cover up the truth until release
I'm not stupid enough to day 1 buy, but I really do hope they're good after the shitty first RTX series
explodin vrms
so is a 3070 more recommended?
Afterburner figures always confuse me. For instance why does having 32 gb of normal ram spike vram usage by an entire gig?
Reminder Nvidia has never lied about their benchmarks, all this coping is from AMD pajeet shills.
360w
no they just word things and show their presentations in such a way that could be misleading
Imagine blindly trusting the promises of any business on a product before release
My guess is that the cooler fucks over people with air CPU coolers much harder than NVidia thought it would or the reviewer drivers might be shit right now or something
sooo FE this time around is still shit hten?
>my corporation is good that corporation is bad
God, going from 8-12 makes that much difference for the low %? That’s fucking insane and really quickly has diminishing returns. These numbers do look weird man
Because with more RAM you can use more RAM.
Because the game is made for 8GB. On PC you run some of that RAM for background processes.
And as said above, with more RAM, more programs can be put into RAM instead of being dumbed down to the regular storage.
In short if you see someone crying over high memory use when you have lots of memory they are either braindead, or a Linux user, which automatically applies he's retarded.
Well yeah but what does having 32 gigs of system ram have to do with 1 gig extra usage of videoram?
its more likethe game making space to use 10gb with less that a halg gig of difference once you get the needed 10gb
still i know that the more memory = more memory rails, so likely it wont be a waste of memory on the gpu if you want absolute performance
I guess. Wouldn't it be smarter to load more into the VRAM when you has less system ram though?
here i was thnking about getting 3080
and apparently its shit
not really because of what that memory is.
the GPU only keeps textures and models, the CPU ram is assorted data, it tells the GPU how to render the textures and models it has in vram. when a GPU doesnt have the data it needs, it asks the CPU wich then needs to fetch it from storage. it could be the case that some game engine would store that in CPU ram already but tbqh i never heard of this being done. would surely be a good thing since many computers have more that 8gb ram
Nvidia marketing is misleading as always.
Cards are gonna go for 150% of msrp just like the 2080ti did last time.
>65 fps
was it running on 2080ti?
AC Origins and Odyssey are such a garbage town
Hope you got the 3080 for smooth 55fps gameplay this November with whatever that Viking one is called
Every single AIB opted out of the push-pull fan layout and chose to stick to traditional double/triple downward fans. Clearly having the upward exhaust straight into the CPU cooler is an issue.
Will be interesting to see comparative reviews with the AIB cooler designs later.
55 fps???
Maybe with 3090/10990k/32 gb 4733mhz/nvme ssd
But AMD has been consistently btfo by nvidia for the past 5 or so generations
I have a hope that instead of a TI skew, they do a 30X0s or something a little smaller. I would try a 3080S next year maybe but otherwise I’ll just wait
get back in the amd vs intel thread zhang, it works better there
I don't understand the reasoning they give. They say it's because some reviewers requested the NDA be moved forward because they received the cards late due to covid impacting shipping. Why can't they just release their reviews after the original NDA?
Lol yeah, resolution? Who cares about that info? That doesn't affect performance at all.
I think next year we gonna see impact of covid and nvidia will focus on 3040/3050/3060 and Super will be out in 2022
>Why can't they just release their reviews after the original NDA?
Are you retarded? First come first click, releasing a review of ANYTHING even 1 day late is 99% of your clicks gone. Clicks are their income.
If Anandtech gets their review out a a couple days after 3DGuru, LTT, Jay, GN, etc they are losing basically every viewer they would have gotten, and getting poor income off the review.
having your review out first is very important for tech reviewers bruh. If that's the actual reason they gave I'm inclined to at least partially believe it