Why can't AMD compete with nvidia?

Why can't AMD compete with nvidia?

Attached: Screenshot_20200912-063429.jpg (1440x1837, 523.1K)

Other urls found in this thread:

igorslab.de/en/whole-worse-fake-gtx-2080ti-benchmark-power-the-round/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

There's no need. Only retards buy nvidia. Also with your shitty technology bait shitposting threads.

I have a friend who actually works at AMD's CPU R&D, supposedly the entire company views the Radeon team as kind of a failure.

>As fast as last gen

Attached: 1599282050653.jpg (1000x1000, 58.68K)

Just what happened after HD7000?

Don't expect to get much info on their inner workings from me, i don't have any interesting leaks or crazy insights to share.
That thing about Radeon is just something he mentioned once.

2080ti performance for a fraction of the price isn't bad at all. But the black screen issues the 5700 had puts me off buyng their stuff.

they don't need to try, they have their niche as the budget brand

>Just wait for Titanic Navi

hi guys our fastest card is a fast as the competitions slowest next gen card

AMD always shoots for second-place garbage to be on-par with the previous gen because they know that they'll get rich anyways from the circlejerkers on Reddit who consume purely because AMD good chungus bad

Can't wait for the damage control
>just wait for RDNA 3 bros

Attached: 3r351532152.png (636x425, 289.56K)

>hes not waiting for galactic navi

Attached: 1599846323522.gif (400x400, 1.89M)

as long as they can compete in the budget to mid-tier segments with a lower power draw, stable drivers, and actually get board partners to make white cards, they'll be fine. maybe have a good NVENC alternative, too.
otherwise I'm still buying a used nVidia card

Eh, if they can get that performance paired with 12-16gb of VRAM for $400, it's easily a 3070 competitor. Supposedly that's a 40 compute unit card, and again, supposedly RDNA 2 goes up to 72 CU's for desktop, so the top RX 6000 card should be competitive with the 3090.

AMD doesn't care, they are pajeet "it's ok to not try to win ever once"

they could easily compete with Nvidia last year but they decided to release subpar GPUs without raytracing chip or any cool feature like DLSS at $50 less with unstable drivers

>any cool feature like DLSS
DLSS is still a fucking meme only good for getting midrange cards to do 1440p or high end cards to do 4k on a select handful of games through an upscaling method that - despite the hype claiming otherwise - has artifacting and other inage quality issues.

t. 2070 owner whose used it a lot

OH NONONO

As 2070S owner, 2.0 is fucking magic even with artifacts. Even at 1080p, it's just superior to TAA.

How do i turn on DLSS?

everytime

>its almost fast as the last gen but cheaper
>no drivers

Game has to officially support it, sadly it's not a global thing you can enable in control panel.

seething amd fag

well they will probably compare it to the 3070

>DLSS is still a fucking meme
No, its the future. Nvidia is so far ahead of AMD its not even in the same galaxy. Nvidia is paving the way for the AI revolution.

Was going to get a 3080 but I think I will wait till after AMD cards release because if they are better for cheaper then that is a good thing and it will force nvidia prices down.

AMD could do good last year if they released 2080 performance without RTX at the cost of 2070, instead they inflated the prices to be just slightly cheaper than Nvidia without any of the new tech.

>being a fanboy
Kill yourselves. Just buy the best card for you no matter who makes it.

They do compete, they just don't compete over the top 5% more-money-than-sense retards.

2080Ti is fast as shit and a major upgrade to 95% of people. A newer, more efficient, and cheaper model of that would be pretty sweet.
If you're talking yourselves into thinking you need a 3080/3090 for "next gen" when these consoles are already so behind before even releasing, you're gonna be sorely disappointed (and scammed out of a lot of money).

>no info on CUs
>no info on clock rates
>easily faked AotS benchmark
igorslab.de/en/whole-worse-fake-gtx-2080ti-benchmark-power-the-round/

Attached: 1598634611813.jpg (500x445, 209.04K)

last year it was Nvidia that forced AMD to lower the prices of RX5700 and XT with Super

poorfag cope

You're hurting yourself user

meant to

Facts, imagine being mad we have money

>stable drivers
>AMD

You had me going there for a second.

Nvidia's R&D budget is larger than AMD's annual revenue.

I'd love to go AMD but the problem is that, even if they do have 2080 ti performance, nvidia still has:
>tensor cores for AI features
>DLSS
>better drivers

Whatever that AMD 2080 ti-tier card is, it really has to be a lot more expensive than a 3070 for me to care.

>dude PhysX is the future, trust me
>dude SLI is the future, trust me
>dude 3D Vision is the future, trust me
>dude GameWorks is the future, trust me
>dude RTX is the future, trust me
>dude DLSS is the future, trust me
>dude Reflex is the future, trust me

good meme but things like physx, tesselation and other things were being used extensively in games for the past 5+ years
they're honestly never a big deal but it goes to show that some things tend to stick

DLSS and ray tracing is here to stay for sure, however.

Yes, this is why competition is a good thing for everyone. If the new AMD cards are better for cheaper nvida will have to lower prices to stay competitive and vice versa.

Either way i'm waiting until AMD cards are announced before making a decision.

Yes. AI is the future.

the leap from DLSS 1.0 in XV to 2.0 in Death Stranding was fucking massive though, both in terms of quality and the way it is built

this is only going to improve, it's 4k gaming at a budget - with more headroom for other things like ray tracing or general graphical improvements.

>dude RTX is the future
>dude DLSS is the future
this but unironically.