Good competition

>Good competition
>cutting deals with different publishers to offer more content for less money, a better deal for customers
>ie: EA Play free for Gamepass Ultimate owners
>EA Play is still available on every other platform, even Steam
>the deal Phil signed just make the service better on his platform, but it does not prohibit the service on others

>Bad competition
>pay devs the supposed first year of revenue no matter how the game performs, while maintaining the game exclusive to that platform
>prohibit the game from being on every other platform/retailer during that period
>the dev is happy because they get money even if the game bombs
>the retailer believes the exclusivity will drive more people to the platform (questionable)
>the audience of every other platform is pissed
>the fanbase is basically obliged to buy in a specific store because of the deal
>ie: Hitman 3 epic exclusive for a year

Attached: file.png (200x200, 102.98K)

>300+ games for $15 a month on console+PC+cloud
>you can basically play games whenever and wherever you want
it's all about choice and offering a better return for your investment
some will still believe ownership is better, and ofc you can buy the games too

Attached: file.png (590x350, 311.95K)

>>the deal Phil signed just make the service better on his platform, but it does not prohibit the service on others
I feel this is the most important point. Choice is king and restricting choice with exclusives only creates bitterness.

shut the fuck up brainfart and make games, tim in the meantime actual does something

>you have to pay a set price (with no competition, so it won't come cheaper) to play Hitman 3 in a specific store during an entire year
>if you want hitman on other platform, because you have your entire collection there, wait a year
>if you like the PC platform because it is all about choice, tough luck with this game
>it is effectively an artificial monopoly on specific titles
meanwhile the guy tries to lead a revolution against phone monopolies

Attached: file.png (1280x720, 893.91K)

You're right. Crying on Twitter about your dead lawsuit is "something".

He's literally a chinese pawn to disrupt western business.

>crying
you mean winning dumb brainfart even phil is now sucking tims huge cock

The fact that I can't transfer my previous progress into the next game alone is more than enough reason not to bother with the third game. I hope IOI at least got some decent money out of the entire thing. Guess I'll just buy it at a -75% sale years down the line.

>the phone monopoly this guy critiques is just paying 30% for using the store and the distribution system the platform provides
>if the provider wants to restrict who puts a store on their platform, then this guy believes this is a monopoly
>the platform provides true value, like a distribution service, secure transactions, and a secure platform
meanwhile this guy creates an artificial monopoly with specific games while providing zero extra value. the game is exactly the same as will be on the other platforms, and worst of all, the services he provides are basically nonexistent, aka no community, no shopping cart, no mods, no marketplace,....
He is literally creating micro-monopolies while offering no extra value to consumers

Attached: file.png (696x392, 175.5K)

The most incredible argument that fuck brings forward is his muh 30%. Apparently abolishing it is going to help the users in some way. I guess it works for his iOS marketing trick, but I'm sure he'll just up the price on skins in-game eventually. As for the games on his store, you get nothing from it as they're the same price as on any other platform, or even more expensive depending on your location and payment processor. Suddenly, trickle down economics is supposed to work, even though it didn't for over a decade now, despite all the publishers shilling the "we have to add microtransactions to everything so we can make better games :^)" thing.

he probably wants to debut an epic store in ios, packed to the brim with chink clones of games
that's what you get from all the chink money

>he probably wants to debut an epic store in ios, packed to the brim with chink clones of games
He has admitted as much. He also wants Apple to host the Epic App Store.

Attached: Ef-UMsBWkAEdIzh.jpg (2065x263, 139.69K)

literally a chink rootkit
lol

>being this delusional
Epicucks

Ah, so that's why tencent had him attack Apple, they wanted to get their own app store out of apple's control into the iOS.

*sips*

Attached: tim sweeney.png (623x341, 238.37K)

how's buying the game on egs through vpn?

>>pay devs the supposed first year of revenue no matter how the game performs, while maintaining the game exclusive to that platform
Uh... how exactly do you think Microsoft secured timed exclusivity of games like The Medium, Scorn, and STALKER 2?

>Game is available on Steam exclusively, no GOG or EGS or Origin release
>It's okay
>Game is an Epic Store exlusive
>steamies flip their shit
Cringe

>The fact that I can't transfer my previous progress into the next game alone is more than enough reason not to bother with the third game.
Hitman 2 progression carries over, though.

what exclusivity? they are coming to the windows store, steam and every other key seller
at least the medium and scorn
I don“t know about stalker2

Their facial appearances make me want to bully the fucking shit out of them, especially Tim. Being that ugly should be a crime.

>Game is available on Steam exclusively
there is no "exclusively" on steam, because Steam provides a way to sell keys for the platform, so that there is competition and cheaper prices

Based Phil.

Still salty I have to wait another year to play Hitman 3.

Key that you have to activate on Steam

steam gets zero profit from that purchase
they are literally providing a service for free on external purchases
and the added value of steam is why the dev is releasing the game there

Attached: file.png (416x416, 344.11K)

Why do you think they take to cut off keys dumbass
So that people install Steam and get attached.
And it's still Steam exclusive and there are still Steam exclusive games.

accept defeat, mate
it's not that big of a deal
devs prefer steam because the service is superb and they can sell the keys everywhere
devs on epic are just bribed for a year

there is a difference between exclusivity and choice
steam is the defacto standard because it is the best store right now. and no, EGS does not provide the same services, they just buy exclusives to their platform with chink money

They're specifically not releasing on PS4/PS5.

technically, they win a new customer/steam user.

>meanwhile the guy tries to lead a revolution against phone monopolies
He was just in for the gachas money nothing else nothing more

Attached: 56456561.jpg (286x327, 36.44K)

go ask them. i don't know the deal they have, but it is obviously not the same as Tim kidnapping games from other stores
tell me why Fall Guys is not on xbox and it was free on PSN. I have not heard this being a exclusivity contract at all

but that is a devs choice, not an imposed purchase

epic shills went from ignoring the thread to trying to slide it

Attached: file.png (800x264, 532.7K)

Oh yes, I agree. My point was that it's a smart move from valve since you get a new potential customer and also give the devs more choices with their product

Absolutely, and I am afraid that if steam ends up in a bad situation, the first thing they will remove is free limitless key generation
ie: Nintendo charges for every key you generate in the store