$300

>$300
>Resolution on par with the Index
>Twice as powerful as the last quest
>Releasing with a major AAA release
This wont only make VR mainstream but probably hurt next gen console sales.
The sad part is, normalfags wont care about the facebook requirement.

Attached: oculus-quest-2-facebook-leak-1200x675[1].jpg (1200x675, 49.66K)

>>Releasing with a major AAA release
What is it?

Medal of Honor

presumably that medal of honor game

How about you let me know when the VR headsets don't make you sacrifice something to gain something else? I want a headset that does everything correctly.

The G2 makes you sacrifice proper tracking, but what are the Index and Vive making you sacrifice?

>exclusive to Oculus headsets
Fuck you, Shekelberg. This is why I pirate every Oculus game.

Are you children? The whole point of the Quest is that its STANDALONE. MoH is PCVR. Do I really need to spell this out for you?

>Do I really need to spell this out for you?
Is it spelled "O C U L U S. L I N K?"

LOL, you seriously think most of the people the Quest 2 is aimed at has a gaming PC to run MoH?
Fucking retard

at least it is a signal to other vr manufacturers that they need to be more competitive

quest's pricepoint is just right
and hand tracking is a gamechanger

vive is outdated, and needs lighthouses
vive cosmos is too expensive and no hand tracking

>and hand tracking is a gamechanger
It absolutely isn't, especially the controller-free meme

>$300
don't count on it. only source for that is a walmart placeholder page.
user there is essentially never a single product which is objectively superior in all quantifiable metrics (and only very rarely one so markedly inferior). of any type of thing, personal electronics or dog nail clippers or water-bottles. index briefly was, but time moves on, and VR is a rapidly advancing technology. Index is still pretty clearly the overall best complete package, with its price the only major downside. reverb g2 is like an index but trading the 120/144hz and the lighthouse tracking for a significantly lower price. pimax is like an index but focused entirely on FOV, without the ergonomic, audio, or refresh-rate advantages. Quest 2 is not even really the same class of product, it's first and foremost a games console itself, rather than a PC peripheral.

>quest's pricepoint is just right
Looks like FB is taking a loss here so they can make you the product etc etc

Index has no OLED and is expensive.

I'm not going to spend my money on anything that is going to make me feel like I'm not getting what I paid for. As far as I'm concerned if it's missing features it's defective. If it's not the highest quality it's defective. It's possible to make a proper headset that uses the best technology and techniques possible, but these companies refuse to make it because they don't know how to make it affordable.

'missing features' relative to what?
'not highest quality' relative to what?
If you're saying price is not a factor for you, you CAN buy a varjo and have it customized with index speakers, or spend hundreds of thousands to millions inventing your own one-off vision of 'state of the art'. the point is, in terms of consumer offerings, there will always be tradeoffs and the state of the art will, at least for VR for the foreseeable future, always be rapidly advancing.

You're not listening. Advancing isn't the problem. Compromising is the problem. Every time something is improved something else is made worse. Over and over again there's always some deal breaking downside introduced. It's all so fucking tiresome.

The whole point of the Quest is to do everything, that's why the rift and go were discontinued.

It is made for both. Look at the trailer, it mentions both. Also millions of people have gaming PCs now.

So, let's say I don't mind the Facebook login, If I'm using the current Quest tethered to a PC, why would I bother with this one?

It is more comfortable, has a better screen and is more powerful. If you like your device don't upgrade. It's up to you.

I don't think the slightly worse resolution in the Rift S or the slightly worse tracking in the Reverb g2 are "deal-breaking"

I'm a retard I meant to reply to

im planning on selling my just for the nicer display

Index is what you want. It is the most 'no compromises', was briefly the objectively across-the-board superior offering. But more importantly you should try to understand that tradeoffs are often made for a reason. For example the Reverb G2 is foregoing the 120/144hz and the lighthouse tracking of the Index, in order to cut the price nearly in half.

What we really should have is more modular systems. Tracking NEVER should have been integrated to display, rather the monocular panel+optics assemblies should be standardized and interchangeable. But that kind of standardization is just not strategically feasible to implement in the current harshly competitive environment. Hopefully in the future.

How does the display compare to Reverb G2? Because all that computer shit in the quest is pretty useless if you just want a pc headset. Worse even, because it's pc connection is still limited to a shitty USB cable.

Attached: vlcsnap-2017-12-09-00h16m01s922.png (1920x1080, 828.7K)

sorry, Index is still far superior to that hunk of shit.
>FOV, refresh rate, frunk, over ear speakers
>intuitive non zucced UI

eat shit poorfags im having fun because I paid for it while your data gets stolen and your house gets 3D mapped LMAO

Attached: oculus_cocksuculus.jpg (2000x1000, 117.63K)

FACEBOOK
LOGIN

Oculus is garbage. Nothing can compete with Knux controllers. Everything else looks like a dildo

Attached: sup bitches its ya boi chad warden.jpg (480x360, 10.03K)

>no ipd slider
Into the trash it goes.

>He doesn't have the standardized eye width

Attached: VIRUS.png (600x600, 151.76K)

>bought a quest like 4 months ago
FUCK you

more like the quest bar lmao

because its 3 dollars in the wellness section at walgreens lmao

>hand tracking is a gamechanger
Have fun with your eyetoy games, idiot.

its still selling for $300-400 on ebay user