Completely true! Gamers don't know what they want.
Completely true! Gamers don't know what they want
>TLOU2
>bold story risks
It's called a risk for a reason midwit
go back to twitter megafaggot
>generalize a collective of individuals
>"hurr durr they don't know what they want"
rocco is pretty based, won't agree with his take on tlou2 tho
>fat retard has retarded opinions
who would have guessed
I hate smug false dichotomy fags so much
>ppl say they haet microtransaction
>but u can get anal raped without microtranasaction
>and then they say they haet anal rape wow such hipocrisosy!!!!!!
To be fair, completely breaking character and logic to accommodate a forced tragedy is pretty risky.
>People say AAA games should take more risks
Who? I say they should frankly stop existing. The best games of the last few years have been AA at best, and usually wven smaller than that. Bloated AAA games serve no purpose anymore except to be traps for idiot casuals and MTX paypigs.
Literally who?
it was bold to follow the "villain" for way too long, i dont think it paid off though.
I'm famous please don't rdickule me
>open world third person radiant fetch quest generator number 34924898
>muh revenge bad third person stealth shooter
Truly revolutionary, incredible risks taken
> Blue checkmark
>taking risks means it should be successful by default
Then it wasn't a risk at all.
He's right on Death Stranding
>more risk
>making ellie killing the dog the shitty character petted
Last of Us 2 didn't take risks for the better, it went out of its way to upset the player. Was gross and perverted in many cases. The ending didn't have any payoff. When people ask for risk, they mean much more than undermine their expectations or desires. Anyways, you should keep in mind that rocco and the mega64 boys are sony fan boys.
I wish twitter posters would all be banned on sight.
Zig Forums is the only place you can make "ironic" shitposting like this and get away with it.
The only bold risk was killing joel off and even then that was the least shit part of the story.
Fuck Madden, gimmie a new NCAA football game and I'll buy a fucking console for it.
>another twitter screenshot
I know what I want. I want everybody who makes AAA games to be dead and for there to never be anymore AAA games ever again.
Remember that risk he made when he went across the country to fuck Sam Hyde's ex?
That sure paid off
Sure Death Stranding took risks, but it was common sense hiking simulator that later evolves into a package delivery system would be niche. It's not 100% unique, It reminds me of SnowRunner and these games like Sea Dogs 5 where a main focus can be the trading between places and carrying cargo around for profit. I'm glad it exists I finished it.
I'm not sure I would classify TLOU2 as bold, I mean it was being written as GoT was the most popular thing ever, you had this nihilism and brutal death of main characters and switching perspectives and that was all in GoT and it was the most popular thing ever I think they tried to replicate some of that badly. As for the game itself it's completely safe AAA gameplay, it doesn't really do anything interesting in the gameplay department like Death Stranding
>Twitter screencap thread
WHo are these people?
MAybe Rocco Botte you should step outside of your Twitter bubble where 80% of the comments are made by 20% of people and the absolutle majority of these people come from millenials you colossal idiot.
Not only that but looking at your examples you have clearly no idea what you are talking about.
Death Stranding is a medicore game nit because it cannot be compared to other games but rather how boring it is. The gameplay element "delivering" and balancing your packages is not an exciting.
And no The Last of US 2 doesnt have a bold story, The Last of US 1 had a good story with touching elements and an ending you could understand. TLoU 2 made no sense no matter how you look at it.
So please Rocco fuck off. The only thing we deserve is a complete shutdown of Twitter so we are spared from your opinion and the opinions of other idiots
I love rocco but he has some of the least unique/creative opinions on a lot of game/movie shit
>bold story risk
>generic "revenge is bad" plot
This post is extremely low quality
Starting or instigating a flamewar
trolling outside of Zig Forums
Honest question why is Rocco such a fucking faggot lately?
WELL YOU DONTU KNOW WHATTU YOU RIKE!
I agree with his point but his examples are garbage.
>rocco is now being posted as twitter screenshots and not mega64 videos
>Take risk
>Risk fails
Why do Americans consistently struggle to understand Death Stranding?
running around cosplaying as mario in public got old in 2004
he hasnt made anything funny on his personal channel in a long time. Its just blogs.
Euro here, get fucked. If you think that that piece of shit has any semblance of good writing you have never picked up a book in your entire lifetime
>using twitter, the reason for everything you dislike about modern society
why
>The gameplay element "delivering" and balancing your packages is not an exciting.
doesn't have to be exciting to be good it just has to be satisfying and engaging.
>The only thing we deserve is a complete shutdown of Twitter so we are spared from your opinion and the opinions of other idiots
Did NeoGAF's downfall teach you nothing? What about /new/? You don't shut down internet cesspools. They'll just disperse out into the rest of the net and infect other communities, mainly FUCKING HERE. The only correct answer is to starve them of the attention they so desperately crave.
mega64 sucks dick now to be fair. That tony hawk video was a fucking abortion.
>Defending Death Stranding
Based
>Defending TLOU Part II
Cringe
nobody does, also gamers arent one person
also, fuck twitter threads
>blue checkmark thread
kys you waste of oxigen
>death stranding took a risk with it's gameplay
>last of us 2 just had a shit story with the most bland 3rd person shooter gameplay
naught dog took such a risk
do some fucking gameplay risks and try something new in my video GAMES and not fucking story related shit how hard is that to understand?
T. Mutt
> blue checkmark
Stopped reading there.
Death Stranding was too much, you had a game that had Hollywood actors and a higher budget than most, and yet you had a game-play loop that they must have known will appeal only to small percentage of the population. So it was an expensive game that Sony paid for and it was marketed to the sony movie crowd which was completely the wrong audience I think. It was better received on steam when people knew exactly what it was and didn't go in with wrong expectation, so the problem was more than the fact that it took risks.
drunk illiterate phone posting american
Io non me la prendo con te, ma con quella troia di tua madre che ti ha aiutato a vestirti stamattina
TLoU was based though.
Just because people want different shit doesn't mean they'll accept garbage just because it's different.
>make new genre
Defining moment, do it.
>make story go balls to the walls crazy.
Neat as hell, go for it.
Now on the other hand:
>kill a fan favorite character.
Don’t.
>play as the antagonist mid way through.
Don’t.
If it’s not set up that way in books, don’t go against it. If you’re gonna make me play the villain, they better also be the protagonist since the beginning.
Didn't they all go to Resetera?
He has a blue checkmark.
You don't.
That should've been the end of it if this place wasn't so contrarian all the time.
This.
It was a risk I guess like a TV show would take when it's losing relevance and wants to be more controversial and a topic of conversation. The game part was pretty much exactly what everyone expected and a variation of the same game ND has been making since Uncharted , that's 15 years now.
Does everybody on this board just spend all of their free time going out of their way to look for shit on twitter to get upset at?
Death stranding is a not fully developed indie game idea with a triple A budget.
They came here in the short interim before congregating back to ResetEra. And many of them are still here shitting up the place. It's like Zig Forums, just because there's a new containment board/site doesn't mean you can actually contain them. Once the rats are out of the nest, you can't force them all into a new one.
And that's why shutting down twatter is a bad idea.
Am I supposed to know what that means?
>I deserve madden because other people are stupid
I don't speak Mexican, Pablo
This is kind of true , the entire YouTube and internet culture has destroyed modern games nowadays people watch hour long videos from some random youtuber who just feeds into the people's idea that all modern games should fail. If a game like gothic was released today it would either not be hyped or end up in some random youtubers video who will make fun of it just for some views. In the early days people used to give games time not just base their fun on some streamer or let's play guy.
Yes. Call the game shit all you want, but it definitely took a big risk with the plot structure.
>rocco is so out of touch he thinks madden is still the biggest thing in gaming
Pathetic
based blue check standing up for the voiceless
Rocco is slowly-becoming woke because he probably realized just how big a bullet he dodged when it came out he likes to fly-n-fuck ladyfans, he knows that the moment he fucks-up in 2020, a recently-cucked-by-Lab-Zero Mariel or one of hundreds of bitter fans will let everyone know he's a groomer rapelord that used* to be friends with Sam Hyde and co.
*Charls and the rest still seem cool with them if Garrets Twitter/IG is any indicator
Jesus Christ, I hope you're just pretending to be retarded
Gothic was niche when it was released and it would be niche now it was never thing huge thing that everyone acknowledged. I mean the developers are still making similar games today.