61+ fps

>61+ fps
Soulless..
>60 fps
Soulful..
>30 fps
SOUL
Refute this Zig Forums.

Attached: 30 vs 60 fps.jpg (1280x720, 175.86K)

30 fps looks like cinema, 60 like real life so fuck off

>61+ fps
Lagless..
>60 fps
Laggy..
>30 fps
LAG

ftfy

This is your brain on consoles

spbp

Define "soul"

games get lower framerates when the graphics are better, and bad graphics = soul

being poor

Old games would never have ran at higher than 60 on hardware of the time so I cap them to 60 otherwise they feel soulless
and new games would look fine at over 60fps, but they're so dogshit unoptimised they can barely even hit 60 most of the time

so literally the only games you can reasonably play at high refresh is rhythm games and the few modern competitive shooters that are competently made like CSGO

so the main reason to even have a high refresh monitor is for adaptive sync and osu and that's literally it

It originally was something about hardware limitations being much more severe in the past so everyone had to make their stuff look unique if they wanted to stand out, while modern devs just go "make it look as close to real life as you can" for most things and call it a day.

Really though, SOUL = thing I like, SOULLESS = thing I don't like.

>you
dumb
>me
not dumb

Unironically I prefer 30fps and super high resolution and graphics for games like RDR2 that I play with a controller. The game looks fucking unbelievable at 5k Ultra and since 30fps is a struggle at that setting I cap to 30 and just chill. Even if I had a RTX 8080 or whatever, I'd still play at 30fps and just keep cranking up the resolution to increase the clarity and sampling quality of textures.

>18 fps
KINO

It depends on games/genre for me to be honest. I put everything maxed out I could in RDR2 and capped fps at 30 but I would never fucking play FPS or action game like Devil May Cry with 30 fps thats just fucking disgusting.

There is not a single game worth playing that would not be improved by 60 fps

You are too repugnantly idiotic to be worth arguing with.

There are absolutely no words on Earth that could sway such an utterly brain-dead fallacy.

>console shits claim muh 30fps
>in reality it is more like a stable 26
>still dips into low 20s

OoT is a great game

>144hz
>1ms

Attached: trrreeeps.jpg (661x581, 79.69K)

ok pig

>man this lacks soul, i really wish everything in the background jerked around when i rotated the camera

I kept trying to think of a game that wouldn't be better with a more lifelike framerate
or a genre that wouldn't instantly be better
but I couldn't think of one game

whats the point of 1 ms when your screen is capped at refreshing every 6.9 ms at 144hz?

Attached: 134058458804.jpg (251x264, 18.23K)

Here's your (You)

30 FPS soulles
5-60 variable SOUL

60fps is fine and perfect, anything over that and you're just falling for marketing bullshit.

30fps is fine and perfect, anything over that and you're just falling for marketing bullshit. You can't refute this.

Both correct

op is a fucking faggot
you can't refute this

Doesn't matter the human eye can't see more then 15 fps anyway.

The faster your response times are, the faster the pixels change to the correct colors and thus the longer the light of the correct image is smearing onto your retina. If the pixels take longer to change to the new frame's colors, then this causes blurring across your retina and it looks horrible. Having a strobed backlight helps tremendously in reducing this problem, and even further CRTs are only illuminated line by line where the electron beam is scanning out so only a fraction of the frame is lit at any given moment giving CRTs nanosecond level response times. This gives them the greatest motion clarity despite only operating at typical 60-72hz refresh rates where the screen has 16.67ms to draw a frame.

3fps is fine and perfect, anything over that and you're just falling for marketing bullshit. You can't refute this.

>I thought crt's have less blur because they aren't sample and hold displays. Not because of their response times

whats the point of showing two frames and adding 30 and 60 fps in the corner its a still image are you retarded?

>Refute this

You're a faggot. Your move.

if you aint pushin at least 165hz then you got a small dick with a small dick hole that shoots nothing but pee cause you aint nuttin homie

Attached: oufiygciyugcougc.jpg (3840x2160, 281.19K)

Eyes can adjust to the 30fps. But your controller can't. The game itself feels like molasses going from 60 to 30 fps.

How to spot the person who has never used a mouse in their life.

you say it as if it was a bad thing

>objectively shitty
SOUL
>aesthetically pleasing
SOULLESS

I used to be this guy until I got a good high refresh rate monitor. 60fps, while not awful, just doesn't feel great anymore. The point of diminishing returns for me starts at around 90-100fps

You're objectively wrong, because all games befor the PS1 ran at 60 FPS, and only the shitty computer rip offs ran at less than that.
Under 60 was literally a mark of shitty retarded soulpess US GOLD clone of the games.