What's the correct choice in the Reason of State quest?

>the few Lodge members are assholes so all mages and witches must be burned to death

Name one good mage. All of them abused their magic, are immortal, rape, kill whoever they please or mind control or read minds, etc etc.

If IRL you had people with super powers you wouldn't feel safe around them and you wouldn't want them to use their powers as they pleased. Mages proved time and time again they are pure evil, the schools they attend to literally teach them to be ambitious and power hungry, have you even read the books?

Radovid or Dijkstra. Redania should remain independent and Roche's dream is unfeasible and reckless.

>Not siding with Based Djikstra

Nilfgardian collaborators get the noose

Write it in green all you want, it isn’t incorrect

Radovid ending means healers and pellars die too. Witchers are next.

99% of mages are arrogant and lazy assholes. Only 4 mages weren't an asshole to Geralt.

>healers and pellars
Most of them are useless charlatans.
>Witchers are next.
There're less than 10 witchers at the end of the game.

> healers and pellars die too.

God. You do realize you don't need to be born a mage to use magic, right? The witcher world is full of artifacts, accidental curses, etc.

Instead of having shitty healers summoning spirits so a kid doesn't get the pox, people will have to use actual doctors. Radovid is not against medicine, Shani is literally a Redania medic.

And nobody said Witchers are 3, specially since there are very few witchers left, and if they are next, good, there are barely any monsters left too.

>siding with a whoreson

If you join a secret society whose expressed purpose is to usurp political power, you don't get to act like a victim if you lose

The one who personally comes down and helps you during the siege of Kaer Morhen

Based, Hjalmar is also the better choice for king of Skellige

it was a terrible resolution that makes less sense the more you think about. I just have to side with Roche given our history in W2 but I found Sigi to be one of the most compelling and interesting characters CDPR has ever done. It left a very bitter taste because Sigi would have never left that decision up to geralt. He would have simply sent assassins after Roche and Thaler, not mention that Thaler would have probably been wise to Djikstra's double cross plans earlier. I'm not saying everyone should have rode into the sunset but it wasn't like Djikstra couldn't have struck some kind of deal with Temeria instead of blowing his wad in a dingy outdoor theater with 8 henchmen.

Fewer

Only if you helped him to fix his mess.

Dijkstra's scheme made no sense and was out of character. It was the weakest writing in the game.

If he wanted to seize control he still could've done so. He didn't need the Blue Stripes dead and he didn't even need the messenger sent to Emhyr to die. He could've just taken power and lead the North in spite of the conspirators, without picking a fight by himself accompanied a couple of goons with two elite commandos and a witcher. The forced drama of the matter was horrific.

Dijkstra helps you find and free Dandelion and gives you the pass so you can freely enter and leave Novigrad

They could have kept Iorveth in if they were going to make you choose between Roche and somebody else. As you said, the whole conflict is forced and makes little sense. But then again, they also force you to be quite nice to characters like Philippa so they clearly don't give a fuck about The Witcher 1 and 2 or about decent storytelling.

This
It's extremely out of character for Djikstra too, he's meant to be a LOT smarter than that

How bad it's that I find Djikstra attractive.

>Name one good mage
Visenna