ITT games that filtered Zig Forums

I want to explore Rebecca's chamber.

I think so, and I hate it.
>Look at how shit Zero and CV are people are sick of these games.

No, they are just shit.

If you've never played them before, 0 is probably better. The lack of item boxes and the hookshot are terrible, but not game breaking where as CV's Steeve Fagside and the multiple point of no returns can actually ruin a run. That being said, I'd much rather replay CV as prior knowlege negates those issues and makes the gameplay actually fun. So, CVX > 0

Attached: 1600019466876.png (856x262, 216.82K)

Game has lots of beginners traps and a shitter inventory system than the other fca games, that combined with the nosedive it takes at the giant bat boss makes it a god awful place to start the series despite the title.

REmake only got low sales because it was on the gaycube

>nosedive it takes at the giant bat boss
He's easy, just tank him with the grenade launcher. Most of the bosses in zero are a joke but not gimmicky insta-kill shite like Nosferatu or plane tyrant

I finished this game on GC when I was like 15 years old and have no recollection of it being hard. Is it supposed to be?

>Zero is just annoying from the start.
That is your opinion and I disagree.
CV is the game that killed backtracking for me. Yes, backtracking is the ''backbone'' of the RE series, but here it's just insane.
Zero is enjoyable if you play with Billy only and use Becca as a mule. Aka play solo, kill everythign and everyone with Billy, change to Becca and collect stuff.

Everyone’s talk about CV having the possibility to break runs, but what do you guys mean by this?

It's not that bad really
>Use Billy since he takes more hits and give his gun to Rebecca
>Use the handgun parts on Rebecca's gun to balance them out
Sure the game has way more enemies than the other classic RE games but you have twice the firepower and ammo so it's not too tough outside of getting stun-locked by eliminators or general leechrape

By virtue of being fucking shit, right?

The game can be hard. On hard. Compared to REmake:
>REmake is easier than Zero on normal
>Zero is way harder than REmake on hard

For the life of me, I couldn't find the last two leeches

Seriously, stop making up excuses. They're just bad games, especially 0. CVs main problem is all the backtracking and transitions between areas.

There are multiple points in the game that are huge points of no return that suddenly lock you in a new area with no possibility of backtracking. Not new to RE, but made far worse with the Tyrant in a plane boss fight and the character swap. If you get locked into the boss a nod have enough ammo you can either reset the game or use the unreliable gimmick to win which is only even possible if you have the herbs to tank some hits. The other one is after you beat the Nosferatu boss, you swap from Clair to Chris, but ALL items Clair was holding are essentially gone forever. Hope you didn't bring all your guns for that difficult boss, because now they're gone

Leech hunter?
Their location changes depends on the... setup, I guess. There are few setups, and you can actually check which you're playing if you look at the herbs in the staring area (there can be 2 green near the stairs, or one green and one blue...)
Those you missed were probably in the library, on the ''elevator''. Hard/impossible to see.

I only ever got enough for the submachine gun and a few clips. It bugs me to no end that the only classic RE with reloadable submachine guns was Zero

I would like Zero a lot. The environments are absolutely beautiful and when combined with the soundtrack create excellent horror atmopsheres. They cram so much lore into this game, the history of Umbrella. I like most of the enemies, the puzzles, Rebecca and Billy. But damn does the gameplay fucking suck. Having no item boxes is not the biggest deal, but it is when you enter brand new areas and have to mass migrate all your items. That's not gameplay, it's padding and extremely tedious. This game and Code Veronica had developers that wanted to fuck over the players at literally every opportunity they could. Code Veronica in particular is literally a guide game, and you can't convince me otherwise. Try beating the game blind without reloading your save multiple times. I literally never had to that for ANY resident evil game, except this trash. Zig Forums likes to rag on 4 these days but it was a massive improvement design wise compared to early 2000's RE. So yeah, I got filtered, by absolutely retarded broken game design intended to fuck me up at every corner or make my time with the game as tedious as possible. I'm never going to play 0 or Code Veronica ever again.

I played most RE's between RE1 and RE5 but skipped out on REmake back in the day. I want to play it but the thought of having non burned or decapitated zombies resurrecting into zombies who are faster than you is just too much for this boomer turned casual. My stress levels can't take it. Are they as bad and unforgiving as they sound?

Was the N64 build of RE0 ever leaked on Zig Forums?

CV is great until Chris's part. it has one of the best OSTs in gaming as well

>Are they as bad and unforgiving as they sound?
They run faster than you, have claws, red eyes, and hit harder than regular zombies. So yes.

Just burn the bodies. You usually have enough kerosene to only have to deal with 1 or 2 of the resurrected ones. Any others you can just run around them real quick and get to the next room

Again
>Zero is good. CV is not.
is just my opinion, not something that is universally true. Zero is my 3rd fav RE game, and I had to force myself to finish CV. And that was probably on my 5th playthough.

>Are they as bad and unforgiving as they sound?
only if you don't have a shotgun, otherwise, you better just run away from them.

but still, the best way to never encounter them is either burning every zombie you kill or avoid killing zombies as much as possible (which is the recommended way to play RE1~3 games anyway) to save ammo